Users online: 62  Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size Print this article Email this article
Search Again
 Back
 Table of Contents
 
 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Article Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert
 Add to My List
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1725    
    Printed124    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded238    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 2    

Recommend this journal

 
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2011  |  Volume : 2  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 87

Emergency surgical salvage for severe intracranial aneurysm rupture during endovascular coiling procedures not amenable to additional coiling


Department of Neurosurgery, National Brain Aneurysm Center, St. Joseph's Hospital, St. Paul, MN, USA

Correspondence Address:
Eric S Nussbaum
Department of Neurosurgery, National Brain Aneurysm Center, St. Joseph's Hospital, St. Paul, MN
USA
Login to access the Email id

© 2011 Nussbaum et al; This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


DOI: 10.4103/2152-7806.82329

PMID: 21748039

Get Permissions

Background: We report the management and outcomes of six patients who underwent emergency surgical intervention in the setting of severe intraprocedural rupture during endovascular treatment of an intracranial aneurysm not amenable to additional coiling. Methods: From July 1997 through December 2010, our neurovascular service treated 1613 patients with coil embolization. During this time, we encountered six patients who suffered severe intraprocedural aneurysm rupture, defined by contrast extravasation during the coiling procedure, in whom additional attempted coiling failed to stop the ongoing extravasation. Hospital records, neuroimaging studies, operative reports, and follow-up clinic notes were complete and reviewed in all cases. The follow-up review in surviving patients ranged from 1.5 to 9 years (average 3.8 years), and no patient was lost to the follow-up review. Results: In all cases, persistent extravasation necessitated urgent surgical decompression and securing of the ruptured aneurysm. Of these six cases, three patients achieved a good functional status after prolonged rehabilitation, and one of these had only subtle cognitive changes on formal neuropsychological testing. Two patients died. Conclusion: Intraprocedural rupture during aneurysm coiling is a dangerous and potentially fatal event. Despite the seemingly hopeless nature of this situation, in our experience, aggressive management to control intracranial pressure combined with a rapid reversal of anticoagulation and early surgical intervention can result in reasonable outcomes in some patients.



[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*

        

Print this article         Email this article