- Department of Neurosurgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California, USA
Jorge A. Lazareff
Department of Neurosurgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California, USA
DOI:10.4103/sni.sni_199_16Copyright: © 2017 Surgical Neurology International This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
How to cite this article: Maria Punchak, Jorge A. Lazareff. Cost-effectiveness of short-term neurosurgical missions relative to other surgical specialties. 14-Mar-2017;8:37
How to cite this URL: Maria Punchak, Jorge A. Lazareff. Cost-effectiveness of short-term neurosurgical missions relative to other surgical specialties. 14-Mar-2017;8:37. Available from: http://surgicalneurologyint.com/surgicalint_articles/cost%e2%80%91effectiveness-of-short%e2%80%91term-neurosurgical-missions-relative-to-other-surgical-specialties/
Background:Short-term surgical relief efforts have helped close some gaps in the provision of surgical care in remote settings. We reviewed the published literature on short-term surgical missions to compare their cost-effectiveness across subspecialties.
Methods:PubMed was searched using the algorithm [“cost-effectiveness” AND “surgery” AND (“mission” OR “volunteer”)]. Articles detailing the cost-effectiveness of short-term surgical missions in low and middle-income countries (LMIC) were included. Only direct mission costs were considered, and all costs were converted into 2014 USD.
Results:Eight articles, representing 27 missions in 9 LMIC countries during 2006–2014, met our inclusion criteria. Latin America was the most frequently visited region. Per capita costs ranged from $259 for cleft lip/cleft palate (CL/CP) missions to $2900 for a neurosurgery mission. Mission effectiveness ranged from 3 disability adjusted life years (DALYs) averted per patient for orthopedic surgery missions to 8.12 DALYs averted per patient for a neurosurgery mission. CL/CP and general surgery missions were the most cost-effective, averaging $80/DALY and $87/DALY, respectively. The neurosurgical, orthopedic, and hand surgery missions averaged the highest costs/DALY averted, with the cost-effectiveness being $357/DALY, $435/DALY, and $445/DALY, respectively. All analyzed missions were very cost effective.
Conclusion:To date, this is the first study to assess the cost-effectiveness of short-term surgical missions across surgical specialties. Neurosurgical missions avert the largest number of healthy life years compared to other specialties, and thus, could yield a greater long-term benefit to resource-poor communities. We recommend that further studies be carried out to assess the impact of surgical missions in low-resource settings.
Keywords: Cost-effectiveness, global surgery, low and middle income countries, medical missions, neurosurgery
Twenty-eight percent of the global burden of disease is amenable to surgical intervention. The Lancet commission has estimated that 9 out of 10 people in LMIC do not have access to basic surgical care.[
Interest in the provision of global surgery and the recognition that surgical and anesthesia care should be an integral component of a national health system has gained momentum over the past several years.[
Cost-effective analyses have become valuable tools that can aid decision-makers in identifying efficient ways to allocate resources for the provision of health care services.[
To open the discussion regarding this matter, we compare the published literature on the cost-effectiveness of short-term surgical missions, focusing on the differences in costs and effectiveness yielded by different subspecialties. We were particularly interested in determining how neurosurgical missions faired relative to the cost-effectiveness of less technologically demanding specialties. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first systematic review to compare the cost-effectiveness of short-term surgical missions across specialties. We hope that this study will foster further research regarding how to improve neurosurgical care in LMIC through short-term neurosurgical global missions.
A systematic review of currently published literature on the cost-effectiveness of short-term surgical missions was conducted. The database PubMed was searched on March 2, 2016 using the algorithm [“cost-effectiveness” AND “surgery” AND (“mission” OR “volunteer”)]. Bibliographies and related citations in PubMed were used to identify additional articles. All titles, abstracts, and full texts were reviewed to determine inclusion eligibility. Articles were included if they detailed the cost-effectiveness of a short-term surgical mission in a LMIC using standard metrics such as DALYs averted, cost per DALY, and total mission costs. Articles were excluded if they were not in English, contained cost-effectiveness data for only high-income countries, focused on cost-effectiveness NGO or mission hospitals in LMICs or specific surgical interventions as opposed to short-term missions, and did not provide all mission costs nor their related effectiveness.[
Only direct mission costs were considered in our analysis of mission costs. Indirect costs, including opportunity costs for international medical professions who volunteered their time, as well as costs incurred for transportation and medications by patients, were not considered in the analysis. To facilitate comparison between studies, cost estimates for each mission were converted into 2014 USD values using the consumer price index (CPI) published by the US Bureau of Labor Statistics.
The measure of the disease burden addressed by a surgical mission was the DALY, a standard metric of overall disease burden, expressed as the number of healthy years of life lost due to illness, disability, or early mortality used by the Global Burden of Disease Study.[
The effectiveness of each surgical procedure was measured as the number of DALYs averted by each surgical procedure performed. The effectiveness of each surgical mission was calculated by calculating the sum total of all DALYs averted for the surgeries carried out throughout an entire mission. The cost-effectiveness of each surgical mission was then calculated by dividing the total direct cost of each surgical mission, recalculated by one of the authors (M.P.), by the total number of DALYs averted during the mission.
To assess the cost-effectiveness of each mission, the cost/DALY averted for each mission was compared to the country-specific 2014 GDP/capita (World Bank) where the mission was carried out. In accordance with the World Health Organization CHoosing Interventions that are Cost-Effective (WHO-CHOICE) project, mission were considered very cost-effective if the cost/DALY of the mission was less than the GDP/capita of that country.[
We identified 8 full-length publications in our systematic review.[
Latin America was the most frequently visited mission region among the analyzed literature; a total of 16 missions were carried out in 6 Latin American countries. Missions conducted in Latin America represented all surgical specialties for which published studies exist in short-term surgical brigade literature. Only 1 mission was carried out in Africa, and focused on cleft lip/cleft palate surgical interventions. A total of 10 missions were carried out in 2 Asian countries, and similar to Africa only focused on cleft lip/clef palate surgeries. Operation Smile organized all surgical missions carried out in Africa and Asia.
The length of all analyzed missions was between 7 and 8 days. Among all missions, the average patient age ranged between 3.19 and 47, with an age range of 0.3–85 years, for missions that provided this information. The neurosurgical mission had the youngest patient population while the general surgery mission focusing on inguinal hernia repair had the oldest patient population.
The average number of DALYs averted for each patient undergoing surgery during each of the analyzed mission ranged between 1.31 and 10.44 DALYs per patient. Missions focusing on hand surgery, orthopedics, and CL/CP in Kenya resulted in the lowest average number of DALYs averted per patient, whereas the neurosurgical mission and 1 of the missions focusing on CL/CP in Vietnam resulted in the highest number of DALYs averted per patient. When analyzing the individual effectiveness of each surgical procedure, neurosurgical surgeries had both the highest and lowest DALYs averted per surgery compared to other surgical specialties, i.e. an endoscopic cyst fenestration averted 25.20 DALYs and an endoscopic 3rd ventriculostomy averted 23.80 DALYS while a dermoid cyst removal averted 0.10 DALYs.
All analyzed missions were deemed very cost-effective because the cost/DALY of each of the missions was less than the GDP/capita of the countries in which the missions were carried out. Specifically, we found the cost/DALY averted for CL/CP to be on average $79.55 across the 12 published missions. For general surgery mission, the average cost/DALY averted was $87.26, and it was further decreased to $23.50/DALY averted for the inguinal hernia mission. The neurosurgical, orthopedic and hand surgery missions averaged the highest costs/DALY, with the cost-effectiveness being $357/DALY, $435/DALY, and $445/DALY, respectively.
We acknowledge that our study has limitations. Because we analyzed already published data, we could not determine whether the data collection was similar among the articles that were compared. Given the differences in the setting and contexts in which missions were carried out, it may not be possible to combine data from all missions from a specific surgical subspecialty and extrapolate these findings to all surgical missions in that surgical field. Furthermore, there were some discrepancies between the DALYs calculations in the analyzed papers as some authors applied discounting and/or age-weighting while others did not. While discounting at 3%, annual rate is generally accepted, wide use of age-weighting in DALY calculation has been controversial. Moreover, the available cost-effectiveness literature on short-term surgical missions is limited, with only 8 studies currently published, and not all surgical fields were represented in our analysis.[
All publications on cost-effectiveness of surgical brigades came from US-based academic centers and nonprofits, and none of the authors were based at institutions in LMIC. This represents a worrisome trend seen in many fields of international cooperation. There is a tendency towards passivity in the physicians from the host country, and this could be attributed to various reasons, however, perhaps the one that can be changed by the visiting team is to plant the seeds of research interest in the hosts, emphasizing that research is not limited to complex issues linked to availability of biomedical equipment, and certainly involving the hosts in the elaboration of the manuscript is a promising first step towards human capacity building.
The majority of the published missions were conducted in Latin America, which can potentially be attributed to the proximity of US to Latin America making international collaborations easier. Operation Smile was the only organization that provided published cost-effectiveness literature on missions in Africa and Asia. Given that it is one of the most well-established surgical nonprofits in the world, it is likely it can provide the required capacity to carry out complicated surgeries in some of the most difficult to reach places. However, it is necessary to point out the possibility that the published literature on cost-effectiveness of short-term surgical missions does not accurately represent the distribution of missions. For instance, an analysis of mission carried out by member of the Foundation of International Education in Neurological Surgeries (FIENS) demonstrates preference toward volunteer sites in Africa, which may reflect increased need of that region.[
Costs of surgical missions vary by specialty. Interestingly, our study found that some of the biggest contributors to the high costs of neurosurgery and orthopedic surgery missions were transportation of international staff as well as their room and board. In addition, it has been argued that short-term surgical mission by outside surgeons are limited by suboptimal outcomes, unfavorable cost-effectiveness, and lack of sustainability, and thus appear to be beneficial only if no other option is available.[
Compared to the cost-effectiveness of short-term missions, surgeries offered through local hospitals are equally, if not more, cost effective. Gosselin and Heitto in 2008 have shown that a trauma hospital in Cambodia averts 1 DALY per US$87.[
Historically, neurosurgery has been viewed as too sophisticated and of little relevance to developing countries.[
Compared to other missions, neurosurgical mission costs are some of the highest per patient likely because of the complex and technical nature of the interventions that are performed; however, they also avert the greatest number of healthy life years. It can be assumed that one reason for the high DALY/patient is the young patient population of the neurosurgical patients treated.[
Our study is the first of its kind to assess the cost-effectiveness of short-term surgical missions across multiple surgical specialties. We have demonstrated that although delivery of complex neurosurgical care in low-resource setting is challenging, neurosurgical missions avert the greatest number of healthy life years compared to other specialties, and thus, could yield a greater long term benefit to resource poor communities, especially if mission emphasize the importance of postoperative follow up and transfer of surgical skills to the local workforce. Given the lack of research that currently exists regarding the cost-effectiveness of short-term surgical missions, we recommend that further studies be carried out to assess the impact of surgical missions in low-resource settings.
Financial support and sponsorship
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
1. Alkire BC, Vincent JR, Burns CT, Metzler IS, Farmer PE, Meara JG. Obstructed Labor and Caesarean Delivery: The Cost and Benefit of Surgical Intervention. PLoS One. 2012. 7: e34595-
2. Alkire B, Hughes CD, Nash K, Vincent JR, Meara JG. Potential economic benefit of cleft lip and palate repair in sub-saharan Africa. World J Surg. 2011. 35: 1194-201
3. Bickler SW, Weiser TG, Kassebaum N, Higashi H, Chang DC, Barendregt JJ.editorsEssential Surgery, in Disease Control Priorities. Washington, DC: Debas, HT; 2015. 1: 1-18
4. Chao TE, Sharma K, Mandigo M, Hagander L, Resch SC, Weiser TG. Cost-effectiveness of surgery and its policy implications for global health: A systematic review and analysis. Lancet Glob Heal. 2014. 2: 334-5
5. Chen AT, Pedtke A, Kobs JK, Edwards GS, Coughlin RR, Gosselin RA. Volunteer Orthopedic Surgical Trips in Nicaragua: A Cost-effectiveness Evaluation. World J Surg. 2012. 36: 2802-8
6. CHOosing Interventions that are Cost Effective (WHO-CHOICE). p.
7. Corlew DS. Estimation of impact of surgical disease through economic modeling of cleft lip and palate care. World J Surg. 2010. 34: 391-6
8. Davis MC, Than KD, Garton HJ. Cost effectiveness of a short-term pediatric neurosurgical brigade to guatemala. World Neurosurg. 2014. 82: 974-9
9. Dempsey RJ, Nakaji P. Foundation for international education in neurological surgery (FIENS) global health and neurosurgical volunteerism. Neurosurgery. 2013. 73: 1070-1
10. Duenas VJ, Hahn EJ, Aryan HE, Levy MV, Jandial R. Targeted neurosurgical outreach: 5-year follow-up of operative skill transfer and sustainable care in Lima, Peru. Childs Nerv Syst. 2012. 28: 1227-31
11. Egle JP, McKendrick A, Mittal VK, Sosa F. Short-term surgical mission to the Dominican Republic: A cost-benefit analysis. Int J Surg. 2014. 12: 1045-9
12. Gosselin RA, Gialamas G, Atkin DM. Comparing the cost-effectiveness of short orthopedic missions in elective and relief situations in developing countries. World J Surg. 2011. 35: 951-5
13. Gosselin RA, Heitto M. Cost-effectiveness of a district trauma hospital in Battambang, Cambodia. World J Surg. 2008. 32: 2450-3
14. Gosselin RA, Maldonado A, Elder G. Comparative cost-effectiveness analysis of two MSF surgical trauma centers. World J Surg. 2010. 34: 415-9
15. Gosselin RA, Thind A, Bellardinelli A. Cost/DALY averted in a small hospital in Sierra Leone: What is the relative contribution of different services?. World J Surg. 2006. 30: 505-11
16. Grimes CE, Henry JA, Maraka J, Mkandawire NC, Cotton M. Cost-effectiveness of surgery in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review. World J Surg. 2014. 38: 252-63
17. Haglund MM, Kiryabwire J, Parker S, Zomorodi A, MacLeod D, Schroeder R. Surgical capacity building in uganda through twinning, technology, and training camps. World J Surg. 2011. 35: 1175-82
18. Halanski MA, Huang JC, Walsh SJ, Crawford HA. Resource utilization in clubfoot management. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009. 467: 1171-9
19. Hounton SH, Newlands D, Meda N, De Brouwere V. A cost-effectiveness study of caesarean-section deliveries by clinical officers, general practitioners and obstetricians in Burkina Faso. Hum Resour Health. 2009. 7: 34-
20. El Khamlichi A. African neurosurgery: Current situation, priorities, and needs. Neurosurgery. 2001. 48: 1344-7
21. Lapierre F. Humanitarian medicine: What is the role of neurosurgery?. Acta Neurochir. 2007. 149: 445-53
22. Magee WP, Vander Burg R, Hatcher KW. Cleft lip and palate as a cost-effective health care treatment in the developing world. World J Surg. 2010. 34: 420-7
23. Maki J, Qualls M, White B, Kleefield S, Crone R. Health impact assessment and short-term medical missions: A methods study to evaluate quality of care. BMC Health Serv Res. 2008. 8: 121-
24. McCord C, Chowdhury Q. A cost effective small hospital in Bangladesh: What it can mean for emergency obstetric care. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2003. 81: 83-92
25. Meara JG, Leather AJM, Hagander L, Alkire BC, Alonso N, Ameh EA. Global Surgery 2030: Evidence and solutions for achieving health, welfare, and economic development. Lancet. 2015. 386: 569-624
26. Moon W, Perry H, Baek RM. Is international volunteer surgery for cleft lip and cleft palate a cost-effective and justifiable intervention? A case study from East Asia. World J Surg. 2012. 36: 2819-30
27. Murray CJL, Vos T, Lozano R, Naghavi M, Flaxman AD, Michaud C. Disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) for 291 diseases and injuries in 21 regions, 1990-2010: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet. 2012. 380: 2197-223
28. Prinja S, Nandi A, Horton S, Levin C, Laxminarayan R.editorsCosts, Effectiveness, and Cost-Effectiveness of Selected Surgical Procedures and Platforms, in Disease Control Priorities. Washington, DC: World Bank; 2015. 1: 317-38
29. Sedney CL, Siu J, Rosseau G, Dempsey R, Bernstein M. International neurosurgical volunteerism: A temporal, geographic, and thematic analysis of foundation for international education in neurological surgery volunteer reports. World Neurosurg. 2014. 82: 963-8
30. Shillcutt SD, Clarke MG, Kingsnorth AN. Cost-effectiveness of Groin Hernia Surgery in the Western Region of Ghana. Arch Surg. 2015. 145: 954-61
31. Shillcutt SD, Sanders DL, Teresa Butrón-Vila M, Kingsnorth AN. Cost-effectiveness of ingunial hernia surgery in northwestern ecuador. World J Surg. 2013. 37: 32-41
32. Shrime M, Sleemi A, Ravilla T, Donkkor P, Gawande A, Jamison J, Kruk M, Mock C.editors. Essential Surgery, in Debas H. Disease Control Priorities. Washington, DC: 2015. 1:
33. Shrime MG, Sleemi A, Ravilla TD. Charitable platforms in global surgery: A systematic review of their effectiveness, cost-effectiveness, sustainability, and role training. World J Surg. 2015. 39: 10-20
34. Tadisina KK, Chopra K, Tangredi J, Thomson JG, Singh DP. Helping hands: A cost-effectiveness study of a humanitarian hand surgery mission. Plast Surg Int 2014. 2014. p. 1-12
35. Warf BC, Alkire BC, Bhai S, Hughes C, Schiff SJ, Vincent JR. Costs and benefits of neurosurgical intervention for infant hydrocephalus in sub-Saharan Africa. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2011. 8: 509-21