Tools

Nancy E. Epstein
  1. Professor of Clinical Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, University of State of New York at Stony Brook, Mineola, New York, USA
  2. Chief of Neurosurgical Spine/Education, NYU Winthrop Hospital, Mineola, New York, USA

Correspondence Address:
Nancy E. Epstein
Professor of Clinical Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, University of State of New York at Stony Brook, Mineola, New York, USA
Chief of Neurosurgical Spine/Education, NYU Winthrop Hospital, Mineola, New York, USA

DOI:10.4103/sni.sni_27_18

Copyright: © 2018 Surgical Neurology International This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

How to cite this article: Nancy E. Epstein. Spinal case of the month with short perspective: How would you treat this L3-L4 synovial cyst?. 07-Mar-2018;9:56

How to cite this URL: Nancy E. Epstein. Spinal case of the month with short perspective: How would you treat this L3-L4 synovial cyst?. 07-Mar-2018;9:56. Available from: http://surgicalneurologyint.com/surgicalint-articles/spinal-case-of-the-month-with-short-perspective-how-would-you-treat-this-l3%e2%80%91l4-synovial-cyst/

Date of Submission
22-Jan-2018

Date of Acceptance
25-Jan-2018

Date of Web Publication
07-Mar-2018

Abstract

Background:In this new section, Case of the Month with Short Perspective from Surgical Neurology International, we want to see how various spine surgeons would approach different spinal pathologies. In this first case, an elderly male presented with 3 years of lower back pain and progressive neurogenic claudication with bilateral radiculopathy that had exacerbated over the prior 6 months. An outside physician performed a magnetic resonance (MR) study of the lumbar spine that showed a massive synovial cyst filling the spinal canal (e.g., large bilateral cysts) at the L3-L4 level with grade I spondylolisthesis. The MR and CT studies also both demonstrated moderate L2-L3, and severe L3-L4 stenosis.

Methods:Despite the massive synovial cyst filling the spinal canal at the L3-L4 level, pain management (anesthesia training) spent 3 months performing three successive epidural steroid injections accompanied by attempts at percutaneous synovial cyst aspiration/rupture.

Results:By the time the patient presented to neurosurgery, he had developed severe neurogenic claudication, radiculopathy, myelopathy, and a cauda equina syndrome. Dynamic X-rays revealed a mild grade I degenerative spondylolisthesis at the L3-L4 level without active motion, while both computed tomography (CT) and MR studies confirmed moderate stenosis stenosis/ossification of the yellow ligament at the L2-L3 level, severe stenosis at L3-L4 level with spondylolisthesis, and massive bilateral synovial cysts at the L3-L4 level filling the spinal canal.

Conclusions:Following an L2-L4 decompressive laminectomy without fusion (note the absence of motion intraoperatively at the L3-L4 level), the patient's symptoms resolved, and he regained normal function. How would you have managed this patient?

Keywords: Decompression, fusion, lumbar case study, perspective, synovial cyst

INTRODUCTION

In the new Case of the Month with Short Perspective section from Surgical Neurology International, we ask how various spine surgeons would approach different spinal pathologies. In this first case study, an elderly male presented with 3 years of lower back pain and 6 months of progressive neurogenic claudication with myelopathy and bilateral radiculopathy. An outside physician performed a magnetic resonance (MR) study of the lumbar spine that showed moderate stenosis/ossification of the yellow ligament (OYL) at the L2-L3 level with severe stenosis/OYL at the L3-L4 level accompanied by massive bilateral synovial cysts filling the spinal canal and grade I L3-L4 spondylolisthesis. How would you have managed this patient?

CASE STUDY

An elderly male presented with 3 years of lower back pain accompanied by 6 months of progressive neurogenic claudication, myelopathy, and bilateral radiculopathy. An outside physician ordered a lumbar MR scan that demonstrated moderate stenosis/OYL at the L2-L3 level, and marked stenosis/OYL with degenerative spondylolisthesis and massive bilateral synovial cysts filling the canal at the L3-L4 level (note the synovial cysts extended all the way to the L2-L3 level). Despite the marked thecal sac/cauda equina compression, over the next 3 months, anesthesia/pain management performed three epidural steroid injections with attempted cyst aspirations/ruptures. When the patient's symptoms worsened, characterized now by a severe cauda equina syndrome, he was finally seen by neurosurgery; the straight leg raising examination (SLR) was limited bilaterally to 30 degrees, iliopsoas/quadriceps/extensor hallucis longus/dorsiflexors weakness was present bilaterally at the 3/5 level, Patellar and Achilles reflexes were absent, and there was a marked decrease in pin appreciation in the L3, L4, and L5 distributions. Dynamic X-rays showed a mild grade I degenerative spondylolisthesis t the L3-L4 level without active motion. The CT and the new MR scans confirmed moderate L2-L3 and severe L3-L4 stenosis/OYL with massive bilateral L3-L4 synovial cysts filling the spinal canal and the previously noted grade I l3-L4 spondylolistheiss [Figures 1 4 ]. Following an L2-L4 laminectomy for decompression/excision of stenosis/OYL and the massive bilateral synovial cysts without fusion (e.g. no motion documented intraoperatively at the L3-L4 level), the patient was asymptomatic. How would other spine surgeons have managed this patient?


Figure 1

This axial T2-weighted MR at the L3-L4 level demonstrated a large central hyperintense mass (bilateral synovial cysts/capsules) and ossification of the yellow ligament (OYL) filling the dorsal spinal canal at the L3-L4 level. Fluid was also noted in bilateral L3-L4 facet joints

 

Figure 2

The midline sagittal T2-weighted MR demonstrated a hyperintense/somewhat heterogeneous mass consistent with coalescence of bilateral synovial cysts filling the dorsal spinal canal at the L3-L4 level. Note that at surgery, the coalesced synovial cysts extended all the way to the L2-L3 level

 

Figure 3

The axial soft tissue CT showed marked stenosis attributed to bilateral OYL and massive calcified capsules of the bilateral synovial cysts at the L3-L4 level. Note the air within the right L3-L4 facet joint

 

Figure 4

This slightly parasagittal soft tissue CT demonstrated hyperdensity dorsolaterally consistent with OYL and ossification/calcification of the synovial cyst capsules at the L3-L4. Note L3-L4 degenerative spondylolisthesis was not apparent on this study

 

Short perspective reviewing lumbar synovial cyst diagnosis and treatment

Symptoms and signs of synovial cysts

Patients with synovial cysts typically present in their mid 60s with a 2:1 or 1:1 male: female ratio.[ 2 ] They may exhibit unilateral or bilateral radiculopathy, neurogenic claudication, and occasionally develop cauda equina syndromes. Notably, 40% will have accompanying degenerative spondylolisthesis. The levels involved typically include in descending order; L4-L5 followed by L5-S1, L3-L4, and L2-L3.

Reported failure rates of percutaneous radiographically-directed cyst rupture/aspiration

Synovial cysts typically have tough, firm, thick, and often ossified/calcified capsules containing gelatinous/crank case fluid or fibrous material (e.g. rather thn fluid) that can be readily aspirated.[ 2 3 4 ] In a review by Epstein et al., attempts at aspiration reportely fail in 50–100% of the cases.[ 2 3 ] In 2017, when Lutz et al. attempted 35 lumbar synovial cyst ruptures, 40% required repeated cyst rupture, and 31% needed surgery.[ 5 ]

Success of decompressive surgery for lumbar synovial cysts

Synovial cysts, whether unilateral or bilateral, include foraminal and cephalad components that impinge not only on the thecal sac and the inferiorly exiting nerve root, but also compress the superior, foraminal, and far laterally exiting root.[ 2 3 ] For example, as in this case, for a synovial cyst at the L3-L4 level, the decompression should start at the next cephalad level of L2-L3 to pick up the L3 foraminally/far laterally exiting nerve root so the cyst capsule that is often densely adherent to this root (e.g. in its axillary portion) may be safely removed. If the decompression is confined just to the level of the synovial cyst extrusion, there is an increased risk that the foraminally/far laterally exiting cephalad root will be damaged. Also, of note, these cysts may be densely adherent to the underlying dura as ossification of the cyst capsule may extend to/through the thecal sac. It is, therefore, important to recognize when to decompress the synovial cyst without necessarily attempting to remove its entire adherent capsule from the underlying dura.

Low secondary reoperation/fusion rates after decompressions for lumbar synovial cysts

With surgical decompression, the reoperation rates for synovial cysts is low. In a study by Bruder et al. out of 141 synovial cysts, 70% underwent initial decompression (typically hemilaminectomies).[ 1 ] Patients were followed for an average of 9.3 years, and the reoperation rate for recurrent cysts was 7%, while 9% warranted secondary surgery to address resultant instability requiring fusions. For Scholz et al., there was also a low frequency of postoperative instability following 74 decompressions alone for excision of lumbar synovial cysts.[ 6 ] For patients averaging 69 years of age, only 3 required secondary surgery for recurrent synovial cysts, and just 4 developed instability warranting fusions.

Invitation for comments

This is the first in a series of monthly case studies with Short Perspectives for Surgical Neurology International. We invite your responses. Would you have originally ordered epidural injections in this patient? What surgical approach would you have performed – a laminectomy and/or other decompression alone, and/or decompression with a fusion?

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

References

1. Bruder M, Cattani A, Gessler F, Droste C, Setzer M, Seifert V. Synovial cysts of the spine: Long-term follow-up after surgical treatment of 141 cases in a single-center series and comprehensive literature review of 2900 degenerative spinal cysts. J Neurosurg Spine. 2017. 27: 256-67

2. Epstein NE. Lumbar synovial cysts: A review of diagnosis, surgical management, and outcome assessment. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2004. 17: 321-5

3. Epstein NE, Baisden J. The diagnosis and management of synovial cysts: Efficacy of surgery versus cyst aspiration. Surg Neurol Int. 2012. 3: S157-66

4. Ganau M, Ennas F, Bellisano G, Ganau L, Ambu R, Faa G. Synovial cysts of the lumbar spine--pathological considerations and surgical strategy. Med Chir (Tokyo). 2013. 53: 95-102

5. Lutz GE, Nicoletti MR, Cyril GE, Harrison JR, Lutz C, Solomon JL. Percutaneous Rupture of Zygapophyseal Joint Synovial Cysts: A Prospective Assessment of Nonsurgical Management. PM R. 2017. p.

6. Scholz C, Hubbe U, Kogias E, Klingler JH. Incomplete resection of lumbar synovial cysts – Evaluating the risk of recurrence. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2015. 136: 29-32

2 Comments

    avtar image
    Murali Guthikonda, MD

    Posted April 6, 2018, 2:38 am

    As most synovial cysts arise from the joint, the extension into the joint need removed as well with as minimal joint removal as possible. of the 12 synovial cysts that I removed, I have never fused and found no instability to develop. Simple resection with attention to dural attachment/scarring is adequate. Small residual capsule can be left on the dura if severely scarred down. Also using a Omniguide Laser helped resect these lesions

    Reply
    avtar image
    Fernando Dantas

    Posted May 4, 2018, 3:59 pm

    Lumbar synovial cyst is a rare cause of root compression, in our series it corresponded to only 1.9% of all lumbar surgeries. We always use microsurgical decompression without arthrodesis. We did not have recurrence. The fusion was necessary, in the long term, in 8% of patients

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *