- Department of Neurosurgery, Shizuoka Welfare Hospital, Shizuoka, Japan
Correspondence Address:
Shoko Merrit Yamada, Department of Neurosurgery, Shizuoka Welfare Hospital, Shizuoka, Japan.
DOI:10.25259/SNI_283_2025
Copyright: © 2025 Surgical Neurology International This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, transform, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.How to cite this article: Shoko Merrit Yamada, Yoshihiro Hashimoto. A case of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus without enlarged ventricle and with negative tap test. 04-Jul-2025;16:269
How to cite this URL: Shoko Merrit Yamada, Yoshihiro Hashimoto. A case of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus without enlarged ventricle and with negative tap test. 04-Jul-2025;16:269. Available from: https://surgicalneurologyint.com/?post_type=surgicalint_articles&p=13689
Abstract
Background: Idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) is suspected by clinical symptoms and enlarged ventricles on imaging (Evans index [EI] >3.0). However, it remains unclear how to deal with patients who present with clinical symptoms but have no ventricular enlargement.
Case Description: A 77-year-old man, whose symptoms were diagnosed as age-related (because of no ventriculomegaly and negative tap test) at a hospital visited 3 months prior, came to our clinic presenting with gait disturbance, cognitive decline, and urinary incontinence (iNPH triad). His responses to questions were very slow, and his Mini–Mental State Examination (MMSE) score was 11/30. The patient was unable to stand up from his wheelchair without assistance and had difficulty in taking the first step. On examination, his EI was 0.26 and tap test was negative. However, iNPH was strongly suspected because imaging showed unclear cerebral sulci at the parietal level, a narrow callosal angle, and a disproportionately enlarged subarachnoid space. Lumbar drainage was performed for 2 days, which improved his gait ability and increased his MMSE score to 17/30. We then performed shunt surgery. At 2 months after surgery, he was able to walk freely and independently around the hospital, his MMSE score improved to 25/30, and he was discharged home.
Conclusion: Ventricle size is only an indicator for iNPH, and an EI cut-off of 0.3 is not an absolute indicator. Thus, even in the absence of ventricular enlargement, a thorough assessment is crucial in suspected iNPH cases.
Keywords: Callosal angle, Disproportionately enlarged subarachnoid space, Evans index, Hydrocephalus, Spinal drainage
INTRODUCTION
The diagnostic criteria for hydrocephalus are generally based on ventricular size, with an Evans index (EI) >3.0.[
CASE DESCRIPTION
A 77-year-old man visited a local certain hospital 3-month prior, complaining of worsening forgetfulness and a narrower stride than ever. He could walk steadily and his MMSE score was 19/30. Head magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed opening of the subdural space without ventriculomegaly and moderate leukoaraiosis in the deep white matter [
Figure 1:
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) before surgery. (a) T-2 weighted (T2W) MRI shows no enlargement of the anterior horn of the lateral ventricles but opening of the Sylvian fissure and a mild opening of the frontotemporal subdural space. A wedge-shaped disproportionately enlarged subarachnoid space is observed in the right parietal region. (b) High signal areas around bilateral lateral ventricles are identified on fluid-attenuated inversion recovery MRI.
Figure 2:
Computed tomography (CT) and perfusion CT before surgery. (a) Simple CT scan demonstrates an Evans index of 0.26 and a callosal angle of 78.3°. The Sylvian fissures are wide with clear evidence of periventricular lucency around the lateral ventricles. (b) Cerebral blood volume and (CBV) cerebral blood flow (CBF) are widely reduced, especially in the deep white matter. The mean transit time (MTT) also tends to be delayed, but the bilateral high frontal regions show normal range in blood flow times.
Figure 3:
Computed tomography (CT) cisternography. (a) CT at 6 h after administration of contrast medium into the lumbar subarachnoid space demonstrates flow of the contrast media into the cerebral aqueduct of Sylvius but no reflux into the third ventricle. (b) The contrast medium spreads into the basal cistern and subarachnoid spaces at 24 h, but not into the disproportionately enlarged subarachnoid space in the right parietal region.
Figure 4:
Computed tomography (CT) and perfusion CT after surgery. (a) The tip of the shunt tube was placed into the left anterior horn of the lateral ventricle. The Evans index decreases to 0.23, the periventricular lucency is diminished, the Sylvian fissures become narrower, and the callosal angle increases to 91.5°. However, there is minimal improvement in the disproportionately enlarged subarachnoid space in the right parietal region. (b) Cerebral blood volume (CBV) increases diffusely in the bilateral cerebral cortex. Cerebral blood flow (CBF) also increases sporadically, particularly around the lateral ventricles. The delayed mean transit time (MTT) is improved in bilateral deep white matter.
Figure 5:
Walking before and after surgery. Before surgery, the patient was unable to stand in the wheelchair by himself and was unable to walk without assistance because it was hard for him to move his legs forward. At 2 months after surgery, he was able to stand from his chair without assistance and could walk in a stable posture with wider strides and swinging of his upper limbs.
DISCUSSION
iNPH is generally diagnosed by symptoms of ventricular enlargement without increased intracranial pressure.[
It is difficult to distinguish PVL in hydrocephalus from age-related periventricular leukoaraiosis on CT or MRI. Furthermore, significant periventricular leukoaraiosis is frequently associated with gait disturbance, mental decline, and urinary incontinence reminiscent of the iNPH triad.[
A disproportionately enlarged subarachnoid space is strongly indicative of iNPH. Recently, when DESH is identified in addition to iNPH triad, the patient is considered eligible for shunt surgery even with a negative tap test,[
Compared to healthy individuals, CBF in iNPH patients is known to be reduced. However, the CBF pattern in iNPH is not well defined, and the pattern varies according to the methods being assessed.[
Our report has limitations since the findings in our single case may not be common to all cases. Nevertheless, the authors speculate that the number of patients with nonenlarged ventricle iNPH may be much higher than that reported. Such cases could be included in the category of “Possible iNPH” in the Japanese iNPH guideline because an EI > 3.0 is not included in the mandatory criteria. There might be many patients in whom hydrocephalus is ruled out because of the absence of ventricular enlargement or who are excluded from shunt surgery because of a negative tap test. Thus, it is important to make every effort to prove that surgery is indicated in iNPH-suspected patients, especially in those with nonenlarged ventricle iNPH. With further case reports, we believe that nonenlarged ventricle iNPH may become an established category of iNPH.
CONCLUSION
Preoperative evaluations for efficacy of shunt surgery are necessary for a patient with no ventriculomegaly (EI>3.0) when iNPH is suspected based on clinical symptoms. Even though the tap test is negative in the patient, a thorough pursuit should be achieved, including lumbar drainage, cerebral perfusion evaluation, and cisternography.
Ethical approval:
Institutional review board approval is not required.
Declaration of patient consent:
The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent.
Financial support and sponsorship:
Nil.
Conflicts of interest:
There are no conflicts of interest
Use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for manuscript preparation:
The authors confirm that there was no use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for assisting in the writing or editing of the manuscript and no images were manipulated using AI.
Disclaimer
The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of the Journal or its management. The information contained in this article should not be considered to be medical advice; patients should consult their own physicians for advice as to their specific medical needs.
References
1. Brix MK, Westman E, Simmons A, Ringstad GA, Eide PK, Wagner-Larsen K. The Evans’ index revisited: New cutoff levels for use in radiological assessment of ventricular enlargement in the elderly. Eur J Radiol. 2017. 95: 28-32
2. Da Rocha SF, Kowacs PA, De Souza RK, Pedro MK, Ramina R, Teive HA. Serial Tap Test of patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: Impact on cognitive function and its meaning. Fluids Barriers CNS. 2021. 18: 22
3. Gencer AH, Schwarm FP, Nagl J, Uhl E, Kolodziej MA. The benefits of ventriculoperitoneal shunting in normal pressure hydrocephalus patients-a follow-up of three years. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2024. 166: 372
4. Hamidu AU, Olarinoye-Akorede SA, Ekott DS, Danborno B, Mahmud MR, Balogun MS. Computerized tomographic study of normal Evans index in adult Nigerians. J Neurosci Rural Pract. 2015. 6: 55-8
5. Hijdra A, Verbeeten B. Leukoaraiosis and ventricular enlargement in patients with ischemic stroke. Stroke. 1991. 22: 447-50
6. Ishii K, Kawaguchi T, Shimada K, Ohkawa S, Miyamoto N, Kanda T. Voxel-based analysis of gray matter and CSF space in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2008. 25: 329-35
7. Kawaguchi T, Hirata Y, Bundo M, Kondo T, Owaki H, Ito S. Role of computerized tomographic cisternography in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2011. 153: 2041-8
8. Kitagaki H, Mori E, Ishii K, Yamaji S, Hirono N, Imamura T. CSF spaces in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: Morphology and volumetry. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1998. 19: 1277-84
9. Lee WJ, Wang SJ, Hsu LC, Lirng JF, Wu CH, Fuh JL. Brain MRI as a predictor of CSF tap test response in patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. J Neurol. 2010. 257: 1675-81
10. Mani R, Basem J, Yang L, Fiore S, Djuric P, Egnor M. Review of theories into the pathogenesis of normal pressure hydrocephalus. BMJ Neurol Open. 2024. 6: e000804
11. Marmarou A, Bergsneider M, Klinge P, Relkin N, Black PM. The value of supplemental prognostic tests for the preoperative assessment of idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus. Neurosurgery. 2005. 57: S17-28 discussion 2-5
12. Miyajima M, Kazui H, Mori E, Ishikawa M. One-year outcome in patients with idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus: Comparison of lumboperitoneal shunt to ventriculoperitoneal shunt. J Neurosurg. 2016. 125: 1483-92
13. Nakajima M, Yamada S, Miyajima M, Ishii K, Kuriyama N, Kazui H, editors. Guidelines for management of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (third edition): Endorsed by the Japanese society of normal pressure hydrocephalus. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2021. 61: 63-97
14. Ohmichi T, Kondo M, Itsukage M, Koizumi H, Matsushima S, Kuriyama N. Usefulness of the convexity apparent hyperperfusion sign in 123I-iodoamphetamine brain perfusion SPECT for the diagnosis of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. J Neurosurg. 2019. 130: 398-405
15. Park HY, Kim M, Suh CH, Lee DH, Shim WH, Kim SJ. Diagnostic performance and interobserver agreement of the callosal angle and Evans’ index in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Radiol. 2021. 31: 5300-11
16. Sasaki M, Honda S, Yuasa T, Iwamura A, Shibata E, Ohba H. Narrow CSF space at high convexity and high midline areas in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus detected by axial and coronal MRI. Neuroradiology. 2008. 50: 117-22
17. Scully AE, Lim EC, Teow PP, Tan DM. A systematic review of the diagnostic utility of simple tests of change after trial removal of cerebrospinal fluid in adults with normal pressure hydrocephalus. Clin Rehabil. 2018. 32: 942-53
18. Watanabe S, Shibata Y, Ishikawa E. Idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus with multiple sulcus enlargements but no ventricular enlargement resembling brain atrophy over a long period before diagnosis: A case report. Cureus. 2023. 15: e49757
19. Yamada S, Ishikawa M, Miyajima M, Nakajima M, Atsuchi M, Kimura T. Timed up and go test at tap test and shunt surgery in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Neurol Clin Pract. 2017. 7: 98-108
20. Ziegelitz D, Arvidsson J, Hellström P, Tullberg M, Wikkelsø C, Starck G. Pre-and postoperative cerebral blood flow changes in patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus measured by computed tomography (CT)-perfusion. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2016. 36: 1755-66