- Department of Neurosurgery, Memfys Hospital Enugu, Nigeria
- Department of Surgery, Delta State University Teaching Hospital, Oghara, Delta State, Nigeria
- Department of Surgery, Alex Ekwueme Federal University Teaching Hospital, Abakaliki, Nigeria
- Department of Surgery, University of Nigeria Teaching Hospital, Ituku-Ozalla, Enugu, Nigeria
Correspondence Address:
Chika Anele Ndubuisi, Department of Neurosurgery, Memfys Hospital, Enugu, Nigeria.
DOI:10.25259/SNI_667_2024
Copyright: © 2025 Surgical Neurology International This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, transform, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.How to cite this article: Francis Chukwuebuka Campbell1,2, Kelechi Onyenekeya Ndukuba1,3, Chika Anele Ndubuisi1, Okwuoma Okwunodulu1, Wilfred Mezue1,4, Samuel Ohaegbulam1. Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for subaxial cervical spine injuries; management challenges and early outcome in a neurosurgical center. 24-Jan-2025;16:17
How to cite this URL: Francis Chukwuebuka Campbell1,2, Kelechi Onyenekeya Ndukuba1,3, Chika Anele Ndubuisi1, Okwuoma Okwunodulu1, Wilfred Mezue1,4, Samuel Ohaegbulam1. Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for subaxial cervical spine injuries; management challenges and early outcome in a neurosurgical center. 24-Jan-2025;16:17. Available from: https://surgicalneurologyint.com/?post_type=surgicalint_articles&p=13350
Abstract
Background: Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is an effective technique in managing subaxial cervical spine injury (SCSI). The study highlights the experience and challenges of ACDF for SCSI in a subSaharan neurosurgical center.
Methods: The medical records of the patients who had ACDF for SCSI over 6 years in Memfys Hospital, Southeast Nigeria were reviewed. Relevant data collated include patient demographics, clinical presentation, radiologic images, operative management, and complications. All patients had right-sided ACDF after resuscitation. The follow-up period was at least 3 months.
Results: Eighty-one patients had ACDF, with male preponderance (8:1) and a mean age of 38.9 ± 12.4 years. Motor vehicular accident was the most common injury mechanism (71.6%), and the majority (59.5%) were ASIA A. C5/6 was the most common level of injury (40.7%), and the mean subaxial cervical spine injury classification system (SLIC) score was 7.8 ± 1.40. Fifty-eight (71.6%) patients presented late (>48 h after injury). ASIA A injuries, high SLIC score, and late presentation were associated with higher complication rates (P = 0.02, 0.000, and 0.0001). Dysphagia was the most common complication and was self-limiting. Improvement in neurological status was 84.75% and 10.4% for incomplete and complete injuries, respectively. Only 5% had access to onsite emergency medical services, three patients had comprehensive insurance, and rehabilitation services were available to 35.8% on discharge. The 30-day mortality was 8.6%.
Conclusion: ACDF for SCSI is associated with good outcomes in patients with incomplete spinal cord injury. Challenges in management in our setting were related to poor emergency medical services, late presentation, low insurance coverage, and limited rehabilitation services.
Keywords: Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion, ASIA A injuries, Dysphagia, Subaxial cervical spine injury
INTRODUCTION
Cervical spine injury accounts for about 50% of traumatic spinal injuries in African studies, with more than two-thirds involving the subaxial cervical spine.[
Management of SCSI is faced with numerous challenges which directly or indirectly affect outcomes, especially in low- and middle-income countries.[
Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) offers numerous advantages, including decompression of neural elements, restoring cervical alignment, and improving mechanical stability.[
The study evaluated the perioperative complications, early outcomes, and challenges in managing SCSI with ACDF in a private referral center in sub-Saharan Africa.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
This is a retrospective analysis of ACDF cases done between January 1st, 2017, and January 1st, 2023, in Memfys Hospital, a tertiary neurosurgical hospital in southeast Nigeria. The inpatient records were reviewed, and data were obtained, including demographic information, surgical characteristics and operation details, postoperative complications, and outpatient data.
All consecutive adult patients who had ACDF for SCSI following trauma were included in the study. Exclusion criteria were all ACDF performed for nontraumatic cervical spine pathologies. In addition, traumatic cervical spine injuries managed nonoperatively or with posterior decompression and fixation were excluded.
On admission, all patients were resuscitated following the advanced trauma life support protocol, and the post resuscitation American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) impairment scale was recorded for each patient. All patients had cervical spine computed tomography (CT) scans and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) [
Figure 1:
(a-f) Preoperative images of patients with cervical spine injuries. (a-c) Cervical spine MRI showing severe cervical cord injuries with ascending edema up to C1. (d) Cervical spine X-ray showing C4/5 anterolisthesis and bilateral locked facet. (e) CT scan shows C5 vertebra body fracture with >50% anterolisthesis and a bilateral locked facet (not shown in the image). (f) CT scan showing C4 and C5 vertebral body fractures with posterior element injuries.
Surgical technique
All patients had standard right-sided ACDF using the modified Smith-Robinson technique performed by the same surgical team. Through a right-sided skin crease incision, a subplatysmal flap was developed. The investing layer of the deep cervical fascia was opened. The middle layer of the deep cervical fascia and carotid sheath were exposed, and the carotid artery was palpated. Complete dissection of the middle layer of the deep cervical fascia and retraction of the carotid sheath laterally and the musculovisceral column medially revealed the prevertebral layer of deep cervical fascia and the anterior longitudinal ligament. The operative level was confirmed by intraoperative fluoroscopy with a marker in the disc space. Retractors were then placed beneath the longus colli muscles to minimize tension on the esophagus and carotid sheath. An incision is made in the anterior annulus using the uncus on either side as the lateral border of the decompression. Caspar distraction pins were placed in the middle of adjacent vertebral bodies to aid visualization. Disc material was evacuated under the microscope with the aid of curettes and pituitary rongeur until the posterior longitudinal ligament was visualized. Endplate preparation was performed using a high-speed burr. Trial sounds were used to determine the proper size of the allograft, iliac crest bone graft, or cage. After graft placement, traction or distraction employed during the procedure was removed, and the anterior plating was done and placed flush with the anterior border of the vertebra body. Screws were angled medially, and the final position was confirmed by intraoperative X-ray. After meticulous hemostasis and wound irrigation, the wound was closed in layers over an active drain.
Postoperative care
Patients had overnight stays in the high-dependency unit or longer when indicated. Active chest and limb physiotherapy was commenced immediately. Mobilization was done within 24–48 hours after surgery. Complications following surgery were identified, and appropriate treatments were instituted. Patients were discharged when clinical conditions were satisfactory and followed up in the outpatient department. Immediate postoperative X-rays were obtained, and further imaging was done where necessary [
Figure 2:
(a-d) Postoperative images of ACDF for SCSI (a) CT scan showing C5/6 ACDF using titanium cage and anterior plating (b) Cervical spine anteroposterior X-ray showing C5/6 ACDF (c) Lateral view showing C5/6 fusion using a tricorticate bone graft (d) 2-level corpectomy and fusion using an expandable titanium cage and anterior plating. SCSI- subaxial cervical spine injury.
Statistical analysis
Descriptive analysis was used to determine the means and standard deviation of the variables, and it was presented in charts and tables. Chi-square and student’s t-test were used to compare categorical and continuous variables, respectively. A P < 0.05 was considered significant. Statistical analyses were performed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 20.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).
RESULTS
Basic demographics
One hundred twenty-one patients were seen over the study period, and 81 met the inclusion criteria and were included in the study. There was a male preponderance (8:1). The mean age of the patients was 38.9 ± 12.4 years, with the age distribution showing a bimodal pattern with peak age at 25–34 years [
Operative results and outcome
Most patients (72.6%) had an autologous bone graft, 15% had polyetheretherketone cages, and titanium cages were used in 12.3%. All patients had anterior plating as a component of the ACDF, and zero profile cages were not used. Seventy-two patients had one level fixation, nine patients had two level fixation, and corpectomy was done in five patients. Only 15% had surgery within 24 h of arrival. The delayed surgery was mainly related to unstable cardiovascular status (40.7% had symptomatic bradycardia and/or recurrent hypotension requiring intervention) or other concomitant injuries that precluded immediate surgical intervention.
About 34.5% of the patients had one or two grade improvements on the ASIA scale. Only five patients with ASIA A injury improved, with a recovery rate of 10.41%. Other ASIA grades showed a better recovery rate than ASIA A injuries, with a mean recovery rate of 84.75% (63.6% were fully functional-ASIA E at 3-month follow-up). Two patients with ASIA C injuries worsened [
Complications and challenges in care
Dysphagia was the most common complication in the study (35.8%), most of which occurred in the immediate postoperative period. They were mild and self-limiting except for two patients who had persistent dysphagia on follow-up, though not distressing and did not affect their quality of life.
One patient had esophageal perforation and was managed conservatively with the cardiothoracic surgeon without sequelae. Other complications are outlined in
Figure 4:
Comparing ASIA grade and incidence of complications (dysphagia, symptomatic bradycardia, and recurrent hypotension). Shows ASIA A injured patients had more SB, RH, and postoperative dysphagia (P < 0.001). ASIA: American Spinal Injury Association, SB: Symptomatic hypotension, RH: Recurrent hypotension.
Six patients had implant-related complications, out of which five had graft/plate dislodgment and/or screwed back out. One patient had implant subsidence. Only three patients (3.7%) had re-do surgery due to symptoms related to the implant, while the others remained symptom-free.
About 71.6% (58 patients) presented to our facility after 48 h of injury and more than half after 5 days [
DISCUSSION
Cervical spine injury is a potentially devastating injury to the patient, family, and society. This is more so in subSaharan Africa, where healthcare and economic challenges further negatively impact survival chances and functional outcomes.[
As reported in the literature, the C5/6 level is the most injured cervical spine segment as it forms the fulcrum of the subaxial neck movement.[
Controversies exist on the optimal timing of surgery for SCSI.[
Peculiarities of spinal cord injuries in sub-Saharan Africa make early intervention difficult. There is usually a delay in referral from primary care facilities to tertiary centers where manpower and facilities are available for surgical intervention. In addition, many patients present with severe spinal cord and systemic injuries that require extended resuscitative effort before surgery. It was found in this study that 71.6% of the patients presented after 48 h of SCSI, and 40.7% had an unstable cardiovascular system that required specialized care and intensive unit admission before surgical intervention. This explains why early surgery within 24 h was possible in only 12 patients. Furthermore, ASIA A injuries and high SLIC scores, a predominant pathologic grade seen in our series, were associated with a statistically significant higher incidence of symptomatic bradycardia and recurrent hypotension. This contrasts with reports from developed countries where coordinated response, swift transfer to trauma centers, and early presentation and surgical intervention are practiced.[
The incidence of dysphagia varies in literature and ranges from 1.7% to 67%[
Recurrent laryngeal nerve injury characterized by voice change was seen in two patients; one had ACDF at C5/6 and the other at C6/7, and both improved remarkably on follow-up. Second surgery due to implant-related complications was done in 3.7% of our patients. This was mainly due to hardware malfunction or graft dislodgment following screw backout. The indication for repeat surgery was worsening neurology in two patients and debilitating neck pain in one. There was no report of adjacent segment diseases in our series, and may be related to the short duration of follow-up. Construct failure requiring re-do surgery has been reported in the literature with an incidence of 0.88–5%.[
Neurological improvement of patients with ASIA A injury was poor in this study, as only 10.41% showed some minor gains in motor and sensory function; however, none were fully independent of follow-up. This is similarly reported in other studies as most ASIA A injuries result in permanent cord dysfunction with associated lifelong disability and need for assistance in activities of daily living.[
This is in sharp contrast to developed countries where low mortality rates are reported (0.1–2.3)[
Nigeria’s comprehensive medical insurance coverage rate is <5% and most healthcare bills are settled out of pocket.[
More than half of the patients in our series (59.5%) had complete spinal cord injury. This unusual pattern of presentation seen in low-income countries could be attributed to the poor adherence to the use of protective devices, including the use of seatbelts by motorists, the paucity of on-the-scene interventions, and equipped ambulance services to convey injured spinal patients, thereby worsening the severity of the neurological deficit before arrival to the tertiary center.[
Rehabilitation is essential for cervical spine injury as it ensures optimal recovery of function and reintegration into society. It is long, expensive, and exhaustive, requiring a multidisciplinary team consisting of a physiotherapist, occupational therapist, social workers, and others as necessary.[
CONCLUSION
ACDF for SCSI is associated with good outcomes in incomplete spinal cord injury. Except for the benefit of early stabilization and mobilization, neurological recovery was poor in ASIA A patients. Dysphagia was the most common complication in our series and was self-limiting in most patients. Challenges in management were related to poor emergency medical services, late presentation, low insurance coverage, and limited rehabilitation services. A multipronged approach involving intensive education of family members and caregivers, universal health insurance coverage, improved governmental budgetary allocation to health, and training for health care providers is urgently needed to ameliorate the burden of SCSI in our subregion.
Ethical approval:
The Institutional Review Board has waived the ethical approval for this study as it is retrospective study.
Declaration of patient consent:
The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent.
Financial support and sponsorship:
Nil.
Conflicts of interest:
There are no conflicts of interest.
Use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for manuscript preparation:
The authors confirm that there was no use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for assisting in the writing or editing of the manuscript and no images were manipulated using AI.
Disclaimer
The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of the Journal or its management. The information contained in this article should not be considered to be medical advice; patients should consult their own physicians for advice as to their specific medical needs.
References
1. Admasu AK, Buno E. Short-term outcome in subaxial spine injury patients operated on in a resource-limited setting, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. World Neurosurg. 2018. 113: e702-6
2. Ahuja CS, Badhiwala JH, Fehlings MG. “Time is spine”: The importance of early intervention for traumatic spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 2020. 58: 1037-9
3. Aregbeshola BS. Out-of-pocket payments in Nigeria. Lancet. 2016. 387: 2506
4. Epstein NE. A review of complication rates for anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion (ACDF). Surg Neurol Int. 2019. 10: 3-10
5. Fountas KN, Kapsalaki EZ, Nikolakakos LG, Smisson HF, Johnston KW, Grigorian AA. Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion associated complications. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007. 32: 2310-7
6. Fredø HL, Ali S, Rizvi M, Rezai M, Rønning P, Lied B. Complications and long-term outcomes after open surgery for traumatic subaxial cervical spine fractures : A consecutive series of 303 patients. BMC Surg. 2016. 16: 56
7. Gupta D, Vaghani G, Siddiqui S, Sawhney C, Singh P, Kumar A. Early versus delayed decompression in acute subaxial cervical spinal cord injury: A prospective outcome study at a Level I trauma center from India. Asian J Neurosurg. 2015. 10: 158-65
8. Igun GO, Obekpa OP, Ugwu BT, Nwadiaro HC. Spinal injuries in the Plateau State, Nigeria. East Afr Med J. 1999. 76: 75-9
9. Levi L, Wolf A, Rigamonti D, Ragheb J, Mirvis S, Robinson W. Anterior decompression in cervical spine trauma: Does the timing affect the outcome. Neurosurgery. 1991. 29: 216-22
10. Mezue WC, Onyia E, Illoabachie IC, Chikani MC, Ohaegbulam SC. Care related and transit neuronal injuries after cervical spine trauma: State of care and practice in Nigeria. J Neurotrauma. 2013. 30: 1602-7
11. Nanda A, Sharma M, Sonig A, Ambekar S, Bollam P. Surgical complications of anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion for cervical degenerative disk disease: A single surgeon’s experience of 1576 patients. World Neurosurg. 2014. 82: 1380-7
12. Nas K, Yazmalar L, Şah V, Aydin A, Öneş K. Rehabilitation of spinal cord injuries. World J Orthop. 2015. 6: 8
13. Nasi D, Ruscelli P, Gladi M, Mancini F, Iacoangeli M, Dobran M. Ultra-early surgery in complete cervical spinal cord injury improves neurological recovery: A single-center retrospective study. Surg Neurol Int. 2019. 10: 207
14. National Bureau of Statisti, editors. Nigeria multidimensional poverty index (2022). The 2022 multidimensional poverty index report. National Bureau of Statistics. 2022. p. 184
15. Ndubuisi CA, Mezue WC, Ohaegbulam SC. Effect of age on the space available for the cervical spinal cord (SAC) of Asymptomatic Adult Nigerians. J Exp Res. 2018. 6: 28-34
16. Ndubuisi CA, Mezue WC, Ohaegbulam SC. Space available for the cervical spinal cord of asymptomatic adult Nigerians. Korean J Spine. 2017. 14: 61
17. Nwankwo OE, Uche EO. Epidemiological and treatment profiles of spinal cord injury in southeast Nigeria. Spinal Cord. 2013. 51: 448-52
18. Satar A, Wazir Z, Saeed M, Arif M, Inam M. Early outcome of surgical intervention in subaxial cervical spine injuries. J Pak Med Assoc. 2014. 64: S83-6
19. Solagberu BA. Spinal cord injuries in Ilorin, Nigeria. West Afr J Med. 2002. 21: 230-2
20. Tasiou A, Giannis T, Brotis AG, Siasios I, Georgiadis I, Gatos H. Anterior cervical spine surgery-associated complications in a retrospective case-control study. J Spine Surg. 2017. 3: 444-59
21. Uduu O. Health Insurance in Nigeria-Only 3% of Nigerians are covered. Available: https://www.dataphyte.com/latest-reports/development/health-insurance-in-nigeria-only-3-of-nigerians-are-covered [Last accessed on 2022 Sep 18].
22. Vaccaro AR, Hulbert RJ, Patel AA, Fisher C, Dvorak M, Lehman RA. The subaxial cervical spine injury classification system: A novel approach to recognize the importance of morphology, neurology, and integrity of the disco-ligamentous complex. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007. 32: 2365-74
23. Wilson JR, Voth J, Singh A, Middleton J, Jaglal SB, Singh JM. Defining the pathway to definitive care and surgical decompression after traumatic spinal cord injury: Results of a Canadian population-based cohort study. J Neurotrauma. 2016. 33: 963-71
24. Yildizhan S, Aslan A, Boyaci MG, Rakip U, Kilinc KA. Management of subaxial cervical spine trauma: Clinical results of early surgical decompression. Med Sci. 2021. 10: 207-11
25. Yusuf AS, Mahmud MR, Alfin DJ, Gana SI, Timothy S, Nwaribe EE. Clinical characteristics and challenges of management of traumatic spinal cord injury in a Trauma center of a developing country. J Neurosci Rural Pract. 2019. 10: 393-9
26. Zuckerman SL, Haghdel A, Lessing NL, Carnevale J, Cheserem B, Lazaro A. Cervical spine trauma in East Africa: Presentation, treatment, and mortality. Int J Spine Surg. 2021. 15: 879-89