Abstract

Background: Craniopharyngiomas are benign tumors arising in the sellar and suprasellar regions. Although ectopic tumors do occur, it is usually due to local spread or recurrent tumors. Purely ectopic cerebellopontine angle (CPA) or 4^th ventricle tumors are extremely rare and have been found to be significantly associated with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP), a genetic disorder.

Case Description: Only four cases of ectopic CPA craniopharyngioma associated with FAP have been reported to date. Here, we present the 5^th case of ectopic CPA craniopharyngioma on a background of FAP. The previously described cases have been elaborated as well.

Conclusion: CPA tumor with a background of FAP should raise a differential diagnosis of craniopharyngioma, and similarly, a CPA primary ectopic craniopharyngioma may raise suspicion of underlying APC gene mutation.

Keywords: 4th ventricle craniopharyngioma, Cerebellopontine angle craniopharyngioma, Ectopic craniopharyngioma, Familial adenomatous polyposis, Gardner syndrome

INTRODUCTION

Craniopharyngiomas are benign brain tumors with a point prevalence of 0.5–2 cases/million population, and they constitute 2–5% of all intracranial tumors.[ 13 ] There are two distinct histologic types – adamantinomatous, which has a bimodal age distribution with a peak at 5–15 years and a second peak at 45–60 years, and papillary type, which is rare in the younger age group.[ 3 , 15 ] The tumors arise from the remnants of Rathke’s pouch, usually located in the suprasellar region but, exceptionally, have been described to occur anywhere along the tract of an incompletely involuted hypophyseal-pharyngeal duct.[ 10 , 21 ] Tumor extension to the anterior, middle, or posterior cranial fossa can occur.[ 4 , 25 ] There can be a recurrence of tumors locally or in ectopic sites through cerebrospinal fluid dissemination or surgical tract implantation, but primary ectopic tumors are extremely rare.[ 7 ] Varying radiological and intraoperative classification schemes have been essentially for sellar/suprasellar locations, though some tumors have been reported in the posterior fossa[ 1 , 8 , 11 , 20 ] and even fewer in cerebellopontine angle (CPA).[ 2 , 12 , 23 , 28 , 29 ] CPA craniopharyngioma has been reported in only 13 cases until now as summarized in table 1 , with a further six cases described within fourth ventricle. 4/13 CPA tumors and 3/6 fourth ventricle tumors were associated with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) due to an underlying APC pathogenic variant.

Table 1:

Reported patients with isolated CPA or 4th ventricle craniopharyngiomas.

We report a patient with FAP and an ectopic CPA craniopharyngioma, adding to the potential CPA craniopharyngioma predisposition in FAP.

CASE REPORT

A 47-year-old male, known to have FAP with a confirmed pathogenic variant of APC on genetic testing aged 19, had declined recommended colorectal surveillance for a number of years. He presented with rectal bleeding, following which he was diagnosed with numerous colorectal polyps and a rectal adenocarcinoma. A screening positron emission tomography (PET) scan demonstrated areas of high FDG uptake in the colon and showed an area of photopenia in the posterior cranial fossa and a mass effect on the brain stem [ Figure 1 ]. Brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed, which demonstrated a large, well-defined cystic lesion at the left CPA. The lesion had an isointense signal on T1-weighted images (WI) [ Figure 2 ] and a high signal on both T2WI and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery images [ Figure 3 ]. Marginal microcalcifications on computed tomography (CT) and gradient echo blooming artifacts were seen, and there were multiple craniofacial and paranasal sinus osteomas [ Figure 4 ].

Figure 1:

(a) Positron emission tomography (PET) scan showing “hot spot” in caecum (arrow) and anorectum and a few more focal activities in the colon on coronal view. (b) Axial section shows photopenia (arrow) on the left side of the posterior cranial fossa.

Figure 2:

(a) Isointense signal on T1-weighted images at the left cerebellopontine angle, causing mass effect (arrow) to brainstem and cerebellum. (b) Post IV contrast thin marginal enhancement (arrow) with mildly thickened septae at the lower anterior part.

Figure 3:

(a) Both T2-weighted images and (b) fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) show high signals in the lesion (arrows). At maximum dimension, the lesion measures about 46 × 31 × 42 mm.

Figure 4:

(a) Computed tomography (CT) scan showing marginal calcifications (arrow). (b) 3D reconstruction of the same scan shows multiple craniofacial osteomas (arrows).

He underwent a retrosigmoid approach and gross total excision of the tumor, including the capsule, with intraoperative monitoring of cranial nerves. Adherent choroid plexus at Foramen of Luschka was observed and resected with tumor en bloc. The histology of the tumor was composed of stratified squamous epithelium showing architectural features of an adamantinomatous craniopharyngioma [ Figure 5 ].

Figure 5:

Histology consistent with an adamantinomatous craniopharyngioma characterized by stratified squamous epithelium with a well-defined basal layer and wet keratin. (Hematoxylin and Eosin (H&E), original magnification ×200).

He remained neurologically intact postoperatively without any new deficits and has been subsequently reviewed in the clinic and continues to remain well. A postoperative MRI scan is shown in Figure 6 , confirming gross total excision.

Figure 6:

Postoperative post-contrast T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showing gross total resection.

DISCUSSION

Craniopharyngiomas located outside of the usual embryological locations of the Rathke’s pouch are not common, and CPA is particularly unusual. The presence of craniopharyngiomas at CPA has been theorized to include the migration and entrapment of squamous cells into the posterior fossa from the suprasellar location.[ 23 ] Another proposed hypothesis is that they may originate from residual metaplastic squamous epithelium in the adenohypophysis and anterior infundibulum.[ 16 ] There have been four case reports identified craniopharyngiomas located in CPA and three-fourth ventricle tumors in patients with FAP and its variant Gardner Syndrome before our report [ Table 1 ]. It is, therefore, possible that APC related pathways are implicated in craniopharyngioma of the posterior fossa. Out of the two main histologic variants of craniopharyngiomas all patients reported with CPA craniopharyngioma with background of FAP were histologically adamantinomatous.

Patients with craniopharyngioma can present with several clinical features, including endocrine dysfunction in the form of pan-hypopituitarism, selective hormone deficiency, or posterior pituitary/stalk dysfunction. With the increasing size of tumor, patients may present with features of raised intracranial pressure from obstructive hydrocephalus or with a disturbance in behaviour or mentation due to the effect on hypothalamus, frontal and temporal lobes.

As with any CPA tumor, there can be deficits of multiple cranial nerves. It is interesting to note that our patient was asymptomatic, while in earlier reports, the patients presented with features of raised intracranial pressure, cerebellar, and cranial nerve II, V, VI, VII, VIII, IX, and X symptoms. Screening protocol, including a PET-CT scan at the time of his diagnosis of colorectal cancer, incidentally identified the current lesion.

Nearly all adamantinomatous craniopharyngiomas are driven by somatic mutations in the CTNNB1 gene (encoding β-catenin) that affect β-catenin production.[ 6 ] Papillary craniopharyngiomas practically always harbor a somatic V600E variant in BRAF.[ 6 ] Both APC and CTNNB1 genes are closely related to the WNT/β-catenin pathway, which is responsible for embryonic development and adult cellular homeostasis through multiple functions such as cellular proliferation, cell polarity, and migration.[ 19 ] β-catenin, which is continuously produced in the cytoplasm, is also degraded continuously by Axin-mediated phosphorylation and APC-mediated ubiquitination, thus maintaining an equilibrium. Axin complex consists of the proteins Axin, the tumor suppressor APC gene product, casein kinase 1, and glycogen synthase kinase 3.[ 19 ] When WNT ligands bind to cell membrane G-protein coupled receptors, there is the deactivation of Axin complex-mediated β-catenin degradation; thus, β-catenin accumulates in the cytoplasm and reaches the nucleus. β-catenin in the nucleus activates DNA bound transcription factors of the T-cell factor/Lymphoid enhancer factor family (TCF/LEF family) and causes WNT target gene expression.[ 19 ]

In FAP, the germline pathogenic variant in APC coupled with a second hit somatic mutation results in the lack of β-catenin degradation. In sporadic adamantinomatous craniopharyngioma, which is caused by somatic CTNNB1 mutation, there is production of mutated β-catenin. This is resistant to degradation by Axin complex or APC, thus causing accumulation of β-catenin in the cytoplasm and nucleus.[ 14 ] Gorelyshev et al. found previously undescribed APC pathogenic variants in two blood-related patients with familial adamantinomatous craniopharyngioma.[ 14 ] They did not identify a variant in CTNNB1 in either of them; instead, the tumourigenic event in APC gene was described as a twohit APC mechanism. There was no mention of FAP in their article, but the patient’s mother did have multiple colonic polyps.

Safe maximal surgical excision has been recommended in the treatment of craniopharyngiomas. Gross total excision has been noted to reduce the risk of recurrence.[ 9 ] Almost all the patients reported having near or complete excision and did well postoperatively with minimal deficits from which they fully recovered, affirming the safety of surgery for tumors in this location in these patients. Complete resection may allow adjuvant radiotherapy to be delayed or prevented, which minimizes late side-effects in young people with a genetic tumor predisposition. Close imaging surveillance is required.

CONCLUSION

Craniopharyngioma in CPA is rare. We have described a report of a CPA craniopharyngioma in a man with FAP in addition to the few previously reported cases. Craniopharyngioma should be included as a differential diagnosis of CPA/4^th ventricle tumors in FAP patients. Likewise, a CPA/4^th ventricle craniopharyngioma should also raise suspicion of underlying FAP and may warrant investigation. Early diagnosis and safe maximal resection are the keys to a favorable outcome.

Ethical approval

The Institutional Review Board approval is not required.

Declaration of patient consent

Patient’s consent not required as patients identity is not disclosed or compromised.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

Use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for manuscript preparation

The authors confirm that there was no use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for assisting in the writing or editing of the manuscript and no images were manipulated using AI.

Disclaimer

The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of the Journal or its management. The information contained in this article should not be considered to be medical advice; patients should consult their own physicians for advice as to their specific medical needs.

References

1. Algahtani AY, Algahtani HA, Jamjoom AB, Samkari AM, Marzuk YI. De novo craniopharyngioma of the fourth ventricle: Case report and review of literature. Asian J Neurosurg. 2018. 13: 62-5

2. Altinörs N, Senveli E, Erdoğan A, Arda N, Pak I. Craniopharyngioma of the cerebellopontine angle. Case report. J Neurosurg. 1984. 60: 842-44

3. Aquilina K, O’Brien DF, Farrell MA, Bolger C. Primary cerebellopontine angle craniopharyngioma in a patient with Gardner syndrome. Case report and review of the literature. J Neurosurg. 2006. 105: 330-3

4. Bashir EM, Lewis PD, Edwards MR. Posterior fast craniopharyngioma. Br J Neurosurg. 1996. 10: 613-5

5. Bozbuga M, Turan Suslu H, Hicdonmez T, Bayindir C. Primary cerebellopontine angle craniopharyngioma in a patient with Gardner syndrome. J Clin Neurosci. 2011. 18: 300-1

6. Brastianos PK, Taylor-Weiner A, Manley PE, Jones RT, DiasSantagata D, Thorner AR. Exome sequencing identifies BRAF mutations in papillary craniopharyngiomas. Nat Genet. 2014. 46: 161-5

7. Carleton-Bland N, Kilday JP, Pathmanaban ON, Stivaros S, Kelsey A, Kamaly-Asl ID. Ventricular metastatic dissemination of a paediatric craniopharyngioma: Case report and literature review. Br J Neurosurg. 2017. 31: 474-7

8. Connolly ES, Winfree CJ, Carmel PW. Giant posterior fossa cystic craniopharyngiomas presenting with hearing loss. Report of three cases and review of the literature. Surg Neurol. 1997. 47: 291-9

9. Dandurand C, Sepehry AA, Asadi Lari MH, Akagami R, Gooderham P. Adult craniopharyngioma: Case series, systematic review, and meta-analysis. Neurosurgery. 2018. 83: 631-41

10. Fernandez-Miranda JC, Gardner PA, Snyderman CH, Devaney KO, Strojan P, Suárez C. Craniopharyngioma: A pathologic, clinical, and surgical review. Head Neck. 2012. 34: 1036-44

11. Gökalp HZ, Egemen N, Ildan F, Bacaci K. Craniopharyngioma of the posterior fossa. Neurosurgery. 1991. 29: 446-8

12. Gökalp HZ, Mertol T. Cerebellopontine angle craniopharyngioma. Neurochirurgia (Stuttg). 1990. 33: 20-1

13. Gooderham P, Akagami R, Asadi Lari MH, Sepehry AA, Dandurand C. Adult craniopharyngioma: Case series, systematic review, and meta-analysis. Neurosurgery. 2018. 83: 631-41

14. Gorelyshev A, Mazerkina N, Medvedeva O, Vasilyev E, Petrov V, Ryzhova M. Second-hit APC mutation in a familial adamantinomatous craniopharyngioma. Neuro Oncol. 2020. 22: 889-91

15. Haupt R, Magnani C, Pavanello M, Caruso S, Dama E, Garrè ML. Epidemiological aspects of craniopharyngioma. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab. 2006. 19: 289-93

16. Khalatbari MR, Borghei-Razavi H, Samadian M, Moharamzad Y, Schick U. Isolated primary craniopharyngioma in the cerebellopontine angle. J Clin Neurosci. 2012. 19: 1516-9

17. Kim MS, Kim YS, Lee HK, Lee GJ, Choi CY, Lee CH. Primary intracranial ectopic craniopharyngioma in a patient with probable Gardner’s syndrome. J Neurosurg. 2014. 120: 337-41

18. Link MJ, Driscoll CL, Giannini C. Isolated, giant cerebellopontine angle craniopharyngioma in a patient with Gardner syndrome: Case report. Neurosurgery. 2002. 51: 221-5 discussion 225-6

19. MacDonald BT, Tamai K, He X. Wnt/b-catenin signaling: Components, mechanisms, and diseases. Dev Cell. 2009. 17: 9-26

20. Novák Z, Chrastina J, Feitová V, Lzicarová E, Ríha I. Minimally invasive treatment of posterior fossa craniopharyngioma by means of navigated endoscopy. Minim Invasive Neurosurg. 2008. 51: 165-8

21. Ohmori K, Collins J, Fukushima T. Craniopharyngiomas in children. Pediatr Neurosurg. 2007. 43: 265-78

22. Pena AH, Chaudhry A, Seidman RJ, Peyster R, Bangiyev L. Ectopic craniopharyngioma of the fourth ventricle in a patient with Gardner syndrome. Clin Imaging. 2016. 40: 232-6

23. Powers CJ, New KC, McLendon RE, Friedman AH, Fuchs HE. Cerebellopontine angle craniopharyngioma: Case report and literature review. Pediatr Neurosurg. 2007. 43: 158-63

24. Salgado JA, de Mesa FG, Ledezma JJ, Méndez ML, Sansinenea IP, de Lope-Llorca AR. Craneofaringioma ectópico y síndrome de Gardner: A propósito de un caso y revisión de la literatura. Neurocirugía. 2017. 28: 97-101 (In Spanish)

25. Shah GB, Bhaduri AS, Misra BK. Ectopic craniopharyngioma of the fourth ventricle: Case report. Surg Neurol. 2007. 68: 96-8

26. Sharma M, Mally R, Velho V, Hrushikesh K. Primary isolated cerebellopontine angle papillary craniopharyngioma. Neurol India. 2012. 60: 438-9

27. Uemura H, Tanji M, Natsuhara H, Takeuchi Y, Hoki M, Sugimoto A. The association of ectopic craniopharyngioma in the fourth ventricle with familial adenomatous polyposis: Illustrative case. J Neurosurg Case Lessons. 2022. 3: CASE21572

28. Yilmaz C, Altinors N, Sonmez E, Gulsen S, Caner H. Rare lesions of the cerebellopontine angle. Turk Neurosurg. 2010. 20: 390-7

29. Yan Y, Tang WY, Yang G, Zhong D. Isolated cerebellopontine angle craniopharyngioma. J Clin Neurosci. 2009. 16: 1655-7