- Department of Neurosurgery, Sher-i-Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences (SKIMS), Soura, Jammu and Kashmir, India
- Department of Neurology, Sher-i-Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences (SKIMS), Soura, Jammu and Kashmir, India
- Division of Neurology, Government Medical College (GMC), Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir, India
Correspondence Address:
Abrar A. Wani
Department of Neurology, Sher-i-Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences (SKIMS), Soura, Jammu and Kashmir, India
DOI:10.4103/2152-7806.93410
Copyright: © 2012 Nizami FA. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.How to cite this article: Nizami FA, Ramzan AU, Wani AA, Wani MA, Malik NK, Shah PA, Asimi R. Decompressive hemicraniectomy in supra-tentorial malignant infarcts. Surg Neurol Int 29-Feb-2012;3:29
How to cite this URL: Nizami FA, Ramzan AU, Wani AA, Wani MA, Malik NK, Shah PA, Asimi R. Decompressive hemicraniectomy in supra-tentorial malignant infarcts. Surg Neurol Int 29-Feb-2012;3:29. Available from: http://sni.wpengine.com/surgicalint_articles/decompressive-hemicraniectomy-in-supra-tentorial-malignant-infarcts/
Abstract
Background:Decompressive hemicraniectomy not only reduces the intracranial pressure but has been demonstrated to increase survival and decrease the morbidity in patients with supratentorial malignant brain infarcts (STMBI). The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of surgical decompression to decrease the mortality and morbidity in patients with STMBI refractory to medical therapy and to compare the results with those of the medically managed patients.
Methods:All the 24 consecutive patients with clinical and radiological diagnosis of STMBI, refractory to medical management in 2 years, were included. Option of surgical decompression after explaining the outcome, risk and benefits of the procedure was given to the attendants/relatives of all patients who were fulfilling the inclusion criteria. The patient group, whose attendants/relatives were not willing to undergo surgery, were subjected to the same medical therapy and they were taken as the “control group.”
Results:Supratentorial malignant infarcts were more common in the age group of 41–60 years. Mean age of presentation was 42.16 ± 16.2 years and the mean GCS on admission was 7.83 ± 2.1. Mortality was 16.7% in the surgically and 25.0% in the medically managed group. Patients operated early (rd of the vascular territory involved showed good prognosis. The functional outcome revealed by modified Rankin Score (mRS) and Glasgow Outcome Score (GOS) was better in surgically managed patients. Results of the Zung Self-Rating Depression Score were better in surgically managed patients at 1 year. Barthal Index in the surgically managed group showed statistically significant results.
Conclusions:Decompressive hemicraniectomy with duroplasty if performed early in STMBI not only decreases the mortality but also increases the functional outcome when compared with patients who were managed conservatively with medical therapy only.
Keywords: Brain infarct, decompressive hemicraniectomy, mortality, outcome
INTRODUCTION
The tradition definition of stroke, devised by the World Health Organization in the 1970s, is a “Neurological deficit of cerebrovascular cause that persisits beyond 24 hours or is interrupted by death within 24 hours.” Eighty-five percent of all stroke cases are due to infarction, and only 15% are due to hemorrhage.[
Stroke is the third most common cause of death throughout the world, after cancer and ischemic heart disease. The annual incidence of stroke in the over 45 years age group in the United Kingdom is about 350 per lakh population.[
Acute ischemic stroke in the carotid artery distribution can lead to massive cerebral edema with raised intracranial pressure (ICP), uncal, singulate or tonsillar herniation, and progression to coma or death.[
For most complicated strokes, therapy consists of medical supportive care, prevention of systemic complications and rehabilitation. In cases in which medical therapy fails to control life-threatening increase in ICP, emergent surgical hemicraniectomy can be performed to provide immediate decompression. Following a period of pessimism regarding the role of decompressive hemicraniectomy in acute stroke management, there has been a resurgence of interest in the past decade.[
The concept of wide bone removal for the treatment of intracranial hypertension has been recognized since the 19th century. Different types of decompressive craniectomy have been described, including unilateral or bilateral frontal and subtemporal decompression, and circumferential hemicraniectomy.[
Timing of the surgical decompression is critical. In clinical studies, surgery performed on an average of 21 h post ictus resulted in a decreased mortality rate compared with surgery performed on an average of 39 h post ictal.[
MATERIALS AND METHODS
All patients in this prospective study were managed according to the standardized protocol, which included initial history taking, clinical assessment using Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) and assessment by localizing signs like pupillary size and pulse rate. A computed tomography (CT) scan of the head was done in all the patients to look for the side, vascular territory involved, midline shift and approximate volume of infarct. Instructions of mild head elevation, osmotic therapy using mannitol, glycerol, furosemide, etc. and intubation followed by elective ventilation in patients with GCS less than 7 were given. Decision of surgical decompression has to be made according to the inclusion criteria laid down by the stroke management unit of this Institute, which consists of neurologists, neurosurgeons and the intensive care team.
Following were the inclusion and exclusion criteria for decompressive hemicraniectomy laid by the stroke management unit of SKIMS:
Inclusion criteria
Clinical criteria
Age of the patient up to 60 years. Falling GCS even after extensive medical therapy. Motor response M5, M4 and M3 or (GCS between 5 and 13) Hemodynamically stable patient. <48 h after signs of tentorial herniation. Radiological criteria
CT head evidence of major vessel infarct. Midline shift >2 mm. >50% of vascular territory involved.
Exclusion Criteria
Clinical criteria
Age of patient >60 years. GCS improving with medical therapy. Motor response M6, M2 and M1 (GCS <5 and >13). Hemodynamically unstable patient. >48 h after signs of tentorial herniation. Radiological Criteria
CT brain evidence of small infarcts/lacunar infarcts. Midline shift <2 mm. <50% of vascular territory involved.
Option of surgical decompression after explaining the risks, outcome and benefits of the procedure was given to the attendants/relatives of all patients who are fulfilling the inclusion criteria. An informed consent was taken before shifting the patient for the procedure. The patient group whose attendants/relatives refuse to undergo surgery were subjected to the same medical therapy and were taken as the “control group.”
A large decompressive hemicraniectomy involving the frontal, temporal and parietal bones and duroplasty consisting of pericranium and commercially available dural substitute was used in all surgically managed patients. The bone flaps were stored in the anterior abdominal wall in few and deep freezer in others till they were reimplanted back after 6 months. In a few patients, even methyl meth-acrylate was used for cranioplasty.
Outcome of the surgical decompression was assessed using the Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS), Barthal Index (BI), modified Rankin Scale (mRS) and Zung Self-Rating Depression Scale and was compared with the control group.
Data was described as mean ± SD and percentages. Intergroup comparison was carried out by non-parametric tests (Mann–Whitney U-test and Fisher's exact test). A P-value of <0.05 was considered significant. Software used for statistical analysis was SPSS, Minitab and Java Stat.
RESULTS
Twenty-four patients were included in this prospective study, and a majority (70.8%) of the patients were in the age group of 41–60 years. Mean age of presentation was 42.16 ± 16.2 years. The male to female ratio was 1.18:1. Twelve (50%) patients underwent surgical decompression, whereas the rest of the 12 (50%) were managed on medical lines of treatment. 70.2% patients were admitted within 24 h, whereas 20.8% were admitted after 24 h of ictus. The GCS on admission in both the groups was 7.83 ± 2.1.
Hypertension, smoking and diabetes mellitus were the main associated factors in our patients in both medically and surgically managed patients. Overall, right-sided (66.7%) infarcts were more common than left-sided (33.3%) infarcts in our study. The most commonly involved vascular territory was the middle cerebral artery (75.0%), followed by anterior cerebral artery (12.5%) and internal carotid artery (12.5%) infarct on CT scan head. A second CT scan of the head was done in all of the surgically managed patients, and it was done in <48 h in 83.3% of the patients.
The aim of conducting the second CT head was to look for the midline shift and size of infarcts, as the infarcts usually takes some time to evolve fully. Midline shift in 62.5% patients was less than 5 mm and in 37.5% of the patients, it was more than 5 mm. Size of the infarct calculated was equal or more than 50% of the vascular territory involved in 29.2% and less than 50% in 70.8% of the patients.
Of 12 operated patients, 10 (83.3%) were operated within 48 h of ictus, whereas the rest of the 12 (16.7%) were operated after 48 h of ictus. Both of the patients operated after 48 h of ictus died in the postoperative period, which has revealed that patients with malignant infarcts if operated early (<48 h) will show a better outcome.
Of the 12 operated patients, 10 (83.3%) survived, and they were followed for 1 year. This data was compared with the medically managed group of 12 patients, in which nine, i.e. 75.0%, survived. Comparison of GOS between surgically and medically managed groups showed statistically significant results (P = 0.035) [
Fifty percent of the patients in the surgically managed group showed modified Rankin Scale mRS from 1 to 3, which reflects good outcome, whereas only 22.2% patients in medically managed group showed good outcome after 1 year of follow-up (P = 0.19).
Of 10 patients who survived after decompressive hemicraniectomy, eight (80%) were having a Zung Self-Rating Depression Score (ZSRDS) of 70–90, which was considered normal, whereas only two (20%) patients were having a score less than 70, which was in favor of depression. In the medically managed group of 12 patients, nine (75%) survived, and when these patients were followed for 1 year, only four4 (44.4%) patients were normal and five (55.6%) were having ZSRDS less than 70 [
BI of 19 patients who survived 1 year of follow-up has shown statistically significant results between surgically and medically managed group of patients (P = 0.025). BI >60 is associated with good functional outcome, and <60 means that the patient is dependent after 1 year of follow-up [
DISCUSSION
Of the 24 consecutive patients included in our study for a period of 2 years, 12 were managed conservatively and another 12 underwent surgical intervention in the form of decompressive hemicraniectomy and duroplasty. Mean age of presentation was 42.16 ± 16.2 years. These results were comparable with those available in the literature, as the mean age of presentation in studies by Curry and Pillai et al. was 46.8 years and 48.4 years, respectively.[
We have kept the upper age limit as 60 years because many of the studies have shown poor outcome of decompressive hemicraniectomy in old age. Holtkamp et al.[
Pooled analysis of three randomised trials (DECIMAL, DESTINY, HAMLET) confirms suggestions from nonrandomised studies that decompressive surgery undertaken within 48 h of stroke onset reduces mortality and increases the number of patients with a favorable functional outcome after malignant hemispheric infarction.[
Falling GCS even after medical therapy, motor response M3-M5 and GCS of 5–13 were included in the inclusion criteria, as most of the authors feel that motor response is a more important component of GCS assessment.[
Hypertension is the most common associate risk factor in stroke patients.[
Overall, right-sided (66.7%) infarcts were more common in our patients. One of the recent studies[
Davalos et al.,[
Although an early hypodensity involving more than 50% of the MCA territory on baseline CT is a major predictor of malignant brain infarct,[
Out of five patients who died in our study, two (16.6%) were in the surgically managed group and three (25.0%) were in the conservatively managed group. All the five patients were having midline shift more than 5 mm and infarct size greater than 2/3rd of the vascular territory involved. We used CT scan as an easily available freehand technique for the assessment of midline shift and infarct size was used by Curry et al.[
In the setting of ischemic stroke, patients sustain both cytotoxic and vasogenic edema. Cytotoxic edema is the major mechanism leading to fatal intraparenchymal swelling and mass effect. The time course of cytotoxic edema is slightly variable, but begins within hours after the initial onset of the stroke to even about 3–5 days after infarction. The first 24–48 h after a large MCA infarction is the period during which patients are at the greatest risk of developing fatal brain swelling.[
A comparison of initial study data published by Rieke et al.,[
Decompressive surgery in our patients consisted of creation of a large bone flap and duroplasty. In summary, a large (reversed) skin incision in the shape of a question mark based at the ear was made. A bone flap with a diameter of at least 12 cm (always including the frontal, temporal and parietal bones) was removed, as was done in many of the previous trials.[
Two patients (16.66%) had delayed complications, one had local wound infection probably due to artificial dural patch and the other presented with sinking skin flap syndrome. The first patient presented with local wound infection after 1 month of decompressive craniectomy. He was managed by drainage of the subgaleal collection and putting the patient on antibiotics as per the culture sensitivity report. The second patient came after 6 months with a clinical feature in favor of sinking skin flap syndrome.[
CONCLUSION
This study had shown that the decompressive hemicraniectomy with duroplasty if done early (<48 h) in patients less than 60 years of age improves survival when compared with the medically managed patients. This not only improves the survival but also the functional outcome assessed by GOS, mRS, Zung Depression Score and BI was better in patients who underwent surgical decompression.
References
1. Adams HP, Adams RJ, Brott T, del Zoppo GJ, Furlan A, Goldstein LB. Guidelines for the early management of patients with ischemic stroke: A scientific statement from the Stroke Council of the American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2003. 34: 1056-83
2. Allen CM, Leuck CJ.editorsDiseases of the nervous system in Davidson's Principles and Practice of Medicine. Philadelphia (US): Churchill Livingstone; 1999. p. 974-5
3. Banerjee TK, Das Sk. Epidemiology of stroke in India. Neurol Asia. 20006. 11: 1-4
4. Barber PA, Demchuk AM, Zhang J, Kasner SE, Hill MD, Berrouschot J. Computed tomography parameters predicting fatal outcome in large middle cerebral artery infarction. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2003. 16: 230-5
5. Bereczki D, Liu M, do PG, Fekete I. Mannitol for acute stroke (Cochrane Review). Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001. 1: CD001153-
6. Berry RG, Alpers BJ. Occlusion of the carotid circulation; pathologic considerations. Neurology. 1957. 7: 223-37
7. Bounds JV, Wiebers DO, Whisnant JP, Okazaki H. Mechanisms and timing of deaths from cerebral infarction. Stroke. 1981. 12: 474-7
8. Carter BS, Ogilvy CS, Candia GJ, Rosas HO, Buonanno F. One-year outcome after decompressive surgery for massive non-dominant hemispheric infarction. Neurosurgery. 1997. 40: 1168-75
9. Clark K, Nash TM, Hutchinson GC. The failure of circumferential craniotomy in acute traumatic cerebral swelling. J Neurosurg. 1968. 29: 367-71
10. Collins R, Peto R, MacMahon S, Hebert P, Fiebach NH, Eberlein KA. Blood pressure, stroke, and coronary heart disease. Part 2, Short-term reductions in blood pressure: overview of randomised drug trials in their epidemiological context. Lancet. 1990. 335: 827-38
11. Cooper PR, Rovit RL, Ransohoff J. Hemicraniectomy in the treatment of acute subdural hematoma: A re-appraisal. Surg Neurol. 1976. 5: 25-8
12. Curry WT, Sethi MK, Ogilvy CS, Carter BS. Factors associated with outcome after hemicraniectomy for large middle cerebral artery territory infarct. Neurosurgery. 2005. 56: 681-92
13. Davalos A, Toni D, Iweins F, Lesaffre E, Bastianello S, Castillo J. Neurological deterioration in acute ischemic stroke: potential predictors and associated factors in the European cooperative acute stroke study (ECASS) I. Stroke. 1999. 30: 2631-6
14. Farrell B, Godwin J, Richards S, Warlow C. The United Kingdom transient ischaemic attack (UK-TIA) aspirin trial: final results. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1991. 54: 1044-54
15. Hacke W, Schwab S, Horn M, Spranger M, De Georgia M, von Kummer R. ‘Malignant’ middle cerebral artery territory infarction: clinical course and prognostic signs. Arch Neurol. 1996. 53: 309-15
16. Hankey GJ. Smoking and risk of stroke. J Cardiovasc Risk. 1999. 6: 207-11
17. Holtkamp M, Buchheim K, Unterberg A, Hoffmann O, Schielke E, Weber JR. Hemicraniectomy in elderly patients with space occupying media infarction: improved survival but poor functional outcome. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2001. 70: 226-8
18. Jennett B, Bond M. Assessment of outcome after severe brain damage. Lancet. 1975. 1: 480-4
19. Jüttler E, Schwab S, Schmiedek P, Unterberg A, Hennerici M, Woitzik J. Decompressive Surgery for the Treatment of Malignant Infarction of the Middle Cerebral Artery (DESTINY) : a randomized, controlled trial. Stroke. 2007. 38: 2518-25
20. Kjellberg RN, Parieto A. Bifrontal decompressive craniotomy for massive cerebral edema. J Neurosurg. 1971. 34: 488-93
21. Kondziolka D, Fazl M. Functional recovery after decompressive craniotomy for cerebral infarction. Neurosurgery. 1988. 23: 143-7
22. Krieger DW, Demchuk AM, Kasner SE, Jauss M, Hantson L. Early clinical and radiological predictors of fatal brain swelling in ischemic stroke. Stroke. 1999. 30: 287-92
23. Leonhardt G, Wilhelm H, Doerfler A, Ehrenfeld CE, Schoch B, Rauhut F. Clinical outcome and neuropsychological deficits after right decompressive hemicraniectomy in MCA infarction. J Neurol. 2002. 249: 1433-40
24. Lindsay KW, Ian Bone I.editors. Neurology and neurosurgery illustrated. Section IV. Philadelphia (US): Churchill Livingstone; 2004. p. 239-
25. Mahoney FI, Barthel DW. Functional evaluation: the Barthel Index. Md State Med J. 1965. 14: 61-5
26. Miyazaki Y, Hiari H, Hachisu Y, Takada I. Bifrontal external decompression for traumatic brain edema. Shujutsu. 1966. 20: 845-52
27. Mori K, Aoki A, Yamamoto T, Horinaka N, Maeda M. Aggressive decompressive surgery in patients with massive hemispheric embolic infarction associated with severe brain swelling. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2001. 143: 483-92
28. Mori K, Nakao Y, Yamamoto T, Maeda M. Early external decompressive craniectomy with duroplasty improves functional recovery in patients with massive hemispheric embolic infarction. Surg Neurol. 2004. 62: 420-9
29. Olsen TS, Langhorne P, Diener HC, Hennerici M, Ferro J, Sivenius J. European Stroke Initiative Recommendations for Stroke Management-update 2003. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2003. 16: 311-37
30. Pillai A, Menon SK, Kumar S, Rajeev K, Kumar A, Panikar D. Decompressive hemicraniectomy in malignant middle cerebral artery infarction: an analysis of long-term outcome and factors in patient selection. J Neurosurg. 2007. 106: 59-65
31. Pranesh MB, Dinesh Nayak S, Mathew V, Prakash B, Natarajan M, Rajmohan V. Hemicraniectomy for large middle cerebral artery territory infarction: outcome in 19 patients. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2003. 74: 800-2
32. Rankin J. Cerebral vascular accidents in patients over the age of 60. II. Prognosis. Scott Med J. 1957. 2: 200-15
33. Reddy AK, Saradhi V, Panigrahi M, Rao TN, Tripathi P, Meena AK. Decompressive craniectomy for stroke: indications and results. Neurol India. 2002. 50: S66-9
34. Rengachary SS, Batnitzky S, Morantz RA, Arjunan K, Jaffries B. Hemicraniectomy for acute massive cerebral infarction. Neurosurgery. 1981. 8: 321-8
35. Reynolds K, Lewis B, Nolen JD, Kinney GL, Sathya B, He J. Alcohol consumption and risk of stroke: a meta-analysis. JAMA. 2003. 289: 579-88
36. Rieke K, Schwab S, Krieger D, von Kummer R, Aschoff A, Schuchardt V. Decompressive surgery in space-occupying hemispheric infarction: results of an open, prospective trial. Crit Care Med. 1995. 23: 1576-87
37. Robertson SC, Lennarson P, Hasan DM, Traynelis VC. Clinical course and surgical management of massive cerebral infarction. Neurosurgery. 2004. 55: 55-61
38. Sarov M, Guichard JP, Chibarro S, Guettard E, Godin O, Yelnik A. Sinking skin flap syndrome and paradoxical herniation after hemicraniectomy for malignant hemispheric infarction. Stroke. 2010. 41: 560-2
39. Schwab S, Steiner T, Aschoff A, Schwarz S, Steiner HH, Jansen O. Early hemicraniectomy in patients with complete middle cerebral artery infarction. Stroke. 1998. 29: 1888-93
40. Schwab S, Rieke K, Achoff A, Albert F, von Kummer R, Hacke W. Hemicraniectomy in space-occupying hemi-spheric infarction: Useful intervention or desperate activism?. Cerebrovasc Dis. 1996. 6: 325-9
41. Sims NR, Muyderman H. Mitochondria, oxidative metabolism and cell death in stroke. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2009. 1802: 80-91
42. Sinoff G, Ore L. The Barthel activities of daily living index: self-reporting versus actual performance in the old-old (> or = 75 years). J Am Geriatr Soc. 1997. 45: 832-6
43. Sloan MA, Kittner SJ, Rigamonti D, Price TR. Occurrence of stroke associated with use/abuse of drugs. Neurology. 1991. 41: 1358-64
44. Teasdale G, Jennett B. Assessment of coma and impared conciousness. A practical scale Lancet. 1974. 2: 81-4
45. Teasdale G, Murray G, Parker L, Jennett B. Adding up the Glasgow Coma Score. Acta Neurochir Suppl (Wien). 1979. 28: 13-6
46. Vahedi K. Decompressive hemicraniectomy for malignant hemispheric infarction. Curr Treat Options Neurol. 2009. 11: 113-19
47. van Swieten JC, Koudstaal PJ, Visser MC, Schouten HJ, van Gijn J. Interobserver agreement for the assessment of handicap in stroke patients. Stroke. 1988. 19: 604-7
48. Wannamethee SG, Shaper AG, Whincup PH, Walker M. Smoking cessation and the risk of stroke in middle-aged men. JAMA. 1995. 274: 155-60
49. Whisnant JP. Effectiveness versus efficacy of treatment of hypertension for stroke prevention. Neurology. 1996. 46: 301-7
50. .editors. World Health Organization. World Health Statistics Manual. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 1993. p.
51. Wu YK. Epidemiology and community control of hypertension, stroke and coronary heart disease in China. Chin Med J (Engl). 1979. 92: 665-70
52. Wu Z, Yao C, Zhao D, Wu G, Wang W, Liu J. Sino-MONICA project: a collaborative study on trends and determinants in cardiovascular diseases in China, Part i: morbidity and mortality monitoring. Circulation. 2001. 103: 462-8
53. Zung WW. A self-rating depression scale. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1965. 12: 63-70