Tools

Dimitrios Giakoumettis, Ioannis Nikas, Kalliopi Stefanaki, Antonis Kattamis, George Sfakianos, Marios S. Themistocleous
  1. Department of Neurosurgery, University of Athens Medical School, “Evangelismos” General Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
  2. Department of Imaging, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
  3. Department of Pathology, Children’s Hospital “Aghia Sofia”, Athens, Greece
  4. Department of First Department of Pediatrics, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
  5. Department of Neurosurgery, Children’s Hospital “Aghia Sophia”, Athens, Greece

Correspondence Address:
Dimitrios Giakoumettis
Department of Neurosurgery, Children’s Hospital “Aghia Sophia”, Athens, Greece

DOI:10.25259/SNI-85-2019

Copyright: © 2019 Surgical Neurology International This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

How to cite this article: Dimitrios Giakoumettis, Ioannis Nikas, Kalliopi Stefanaki, Antonis Kattamis, George Sfakianos, Marios S. Themistocleous. Giant intracranial congenital hemangiopericytoma/solitary fibrous tumor: A case report and literature review. 24-Apr-2019;10:75

How to cite this URL: Dimitrios Giakoumettis, Ioannis Nikas, Kalliopi Stefanaki, Antonis Kattamis, George Sfakianos, Marios S. Themistocleous. Giant intracranial congenital hemangiopericytoma/solitary fibrous tumor: A case report and literature review. 24-Apr-2019;10:75. Available from: http://surgicalneurologyint.com/surgicalint-articles/9278/

Date of Submission
01-Aug-2018

Date of Acceptance
08-Jan-2019

Date of Web Publication
24-Apr-2019

Abstract

Background:Hemangiopericytoma and solitary fibrous tumor (HPC/SFT) are considered to be one category according to the WHO 2016 classification of central nervous system tumors. HPC/SFT are subdivided into infantile (congenital) and adult type. Both are extremely rare entities, with little knowledge about etiology, prognosis, and optimal therapeutic strategy.

Case Description:A 10-day-old girl was referred to our neurosurgical department due to hypotonia, palsy of the right oculomotor nerve, and prominent frontal fontanel. Imaging studies revealed a large occupying mass in the right middle cerebral fossa and the suprasellar cisterns. Only a subtotal resection of the tumor was possible, and postoperatively, she underwent chemotherapy (CHx). After a 3-year follow-up, the girl has minimum neurologic signs and receives no medications, and she can walk when she is supported.

Conclusion:Congenital HPC/SFT is considered to have a benign behavior with a good prognosis. Treatment with gross total resection, when it is feasible, is the key to a good prognosis and low rates of recurrence. However, there is no consensus on the therapeutic strategy of a HPC/SFT, which is difficult to be completely resected. Literature lacks a therapeutic algorithm for these tumors, and thus, more clinical studies are needed to reach a consensus.

Keywords: Congenital, hemangiopericytoma, intracranial, solitary fibrous tumor

INTRODUCTION

It is known that congenital brain tumors are very rare with an incidence of 1.1–3.6/100,000 newborns.[ 13 , 14 , 19 , 24 , 38 ] They make up 0.5%–1.5% of brain tumors that are diagnosed during infancy.[ 20 ] These neoplasms consist of teratomas, which are the most commonly found medulloblastomas, astrocytomas, choroid plexus papillomas, ependymomas, and hemangiopericytoma (HPC).[ 24 ] The latter is subcategorized to the adult type and the infantile (congenital) form, which is very rare, and only a few cases have been reported in the literature.[ 1 , 11 , 12 , 17 , 23 , 35 ] It usually has more benign characteristics than that of adults,[ 9 ] more often is highly responsive to CHx and has a better prognosis.[ 2 , 10 ] The latest WHO Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System (CNS) considers HPC a member of a group of lesions designated with the combined term hemangiopericytoma/solitary fibrous tumor (HPC/SFT),[ 4 , 21 ] which are usually located on brain surface. We present a case of an infantile anaplastic HPC/SFT.

CASE REPORT

A 10-day-old girl was referred to our neurosurgical department from the neonatal intensive care unit where it was being treated since her 3rd day after birth due to jaundice. She presented with hypotonia, palsy of the right oculomotor nerve, and prominent frontal fontanel; a cerebral ultrasound and subsequently a computed tomography (CT) scan were performed and revealed a large hyperdense space-occupying mass in the right middle cerebral fossa and the suprasellar cisterns. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) demonstrated a tumor with marked inhomogeneous enhancement, with mixed cystic and solid components with dimensions of 6.7 cm × 6.2 cm × 6.1 cm [ Figure 1 ]. The tumor was occupying the right anterior frontal and medial cranial fossa along the entire right temporal lobe, extending to the frontal and parietal lobes, crossing the midline, infiltrating the cavernous sinuses bilaterally, and compressing the brain stem. Microsurgical resection of the tumor was performed on the 10th day of her life through a right temporal craniotomy. Only a subtotal resection of the tumor was possible due to the size and the position of the tumor, the age of the patient, and the hemorrhagic tendency of the tissues involved. Histology report of the tumor revealed heterogeneous cellular density with cellular heterogeneity and regions with high mitotic activity 12–40/10HPF×40 (WHO Grade III) as well as regions with ischemic and apoptotic necrosis. The tumor was in continuity with the meninges with perivascular growth of neoplastic cells without neoplastic emboli. Gomori staining revealed HPC growth pattern. Molecular analysis by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction for hybrid gene ETS variant 6/neurotrophic tyrosine kinase, receptor, type 3 t(12;15) (p13;q25) was negative. In the immediate postoperative period, the baby presented with an increased tone of the left upper limp and nonreactive pupil. In the late postoperative period, she had an increase in her head circumference and a bulging frontal fontanel. A CT was performed, which revealed obstructive hydrocephalus [ Figure 2 ]. A ventriculoperitoneal shunt was inserted. In the immediate postoperative period, she presented with an improvement in the muscle tone of the upper limbs. Afterward, the child was referred to the oncology department and underwent CHx according to CWS guidance (version 1.5 from July 01, 2009) and received twelve cycles of Vincristine, Actinomycin D, and Cyclophosphamide, without any complications. Postoperative MRI scan after completion of CHx revealed regression of tumor to 3.5 cm × 3.5 cm × 3.8 cm [ Figure 3 ]. After a 3-year follow-up, the girl has no muscle weakness, normal tendon reflexes, and no Babinski sign. However, she continues to have a third nerve palsy. She crawls and can walk when she is supported, she can eat by herself, and she receives no antiepileptic treatment.


Figure 1

(a and b) Hemangiopericytoma and solitary fibrous tumor (HPC/SFT) in a 10-day-old girl. Left: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) axial postcontrast T1-weighted image of HPC/SFT, Right: MRI coronal of HPC/SFT. Postcontrast T1-weighted image.

 

Figure 2

Postoperative computed tomography scan with obstructive hydrocephalus after subtotal resection.

 

Figure 3

(a and b) Postoperative magnetic resonance imaging postcontrast T1-weighted image axial (left) and coronal (right) after completion of chemotherapy.

 

DISCUSSION

The incidence of congenital tumors is 0.34 per one million births, and infantile HPCs are extremely rare with an incidence of <1% of all CNS tumors.[ 29 ] Literature currently reports <20 cases[ 1 , 3 , 5 , 6 , 9 , 11 , 16 , 22 , 26 , 31 , 32 , 39 ] and differential diagnosis includes ependymoma, subependymoma, hemangioblastomas, fibrous tumors, or choroid plexus papilloma. Histological features place the diagnosis, where it should be stated that a cellular SFT is virtually indistinguishable from a HPC. For that reason, the two entities (HPC and SFT) are referred as one category in the latest CNS tumor classification of the WHO in 2016.[ 21 ]

In our case, the neoplasm shows morphological heterogeneity and is composed of cellular areas of the short bundles of spindle, stellate, and ovoid cells with eosinophilic cytoplasm and a round nucleus with fine chromatin without nucleolus and with mild-to-moderate nuclear atypia. A moderate-to-brisk mitotic activity of 12–40 mitoses/10 high-power fields (hpf) × 40 and 2–6 mitoses/hpf × 40 was recognized [ Figure 4a and b ]. Moreover, areas of moderate cellularity and areas composed of dissecting bundles of spindle cells with limited cytoplasm and limited mitotic activity along with wavy and storiform patterns are featuring. Furthermore, the focal myogenic morphology of the spindle cell bundles with focal nodular configuration and the presence of medium-sized veins with an epithelioid configuration of their wall must be delineated. Finally, spindle cells appeared to be either focal cleared or vacuolated, while epithelioid cells appeared with round morphology. Nevertheless, there was an extensive ischemic necrosis of up to 30% along with the presence of focal geographic apoptotic necrosis. Further immunohistochemical studies revealed that there was an expression of cytoplasmic/membranous cluster of differentiation (CD)34 in the stellate/spindle cells [ Figure 4c ]. A heterogeneous expression of smooth muscle actin was also seen in bundles of spindle cells and areas with myogenic differentiation [ Figure 4d ]. Diffuse expression of WT-1 protein along with heterogeneous expression of Factor XIIIa and focal expression of Cytokeratin 8.18 was also observed. However, there was no expression of CD31, erythroblast transformation-specific, human erythrocyte-type glucose transporter protein, Desmin S-100, glial fibrillary acidic protein, Synaptophysin Neurofilaments 2F11, and CD99/MIC-2. Proliferative index Ki-67/MIB-1 was detected in 15–30%, while INI-1/SMARCB1 expression was retained in >99% of the nuclei of the neoplastic cells. HPC/SFT share inversions at chromosome 12q13 and fused NAB2 and STAT6 genes. The latter fusion leads to the nuclear expression of STAT6 protein, which can be detected by immunohistochemistry. Considering mitotic activity, necrosis, and cellularity which are necessary criteria, our case was diagnosed with anaplastic HPC/SFT.


Figure 4

(a) Cellular areas of short bundles of spindle cells with an eosinophilic cytoplasm and a round nucleus with fine chromatin without nucleolus and with mild-to-moderate nuclear atypia. (b) Heterogeneous cellular density with cellular heterogeneity and obvious mitoses in a cellular area of the neoplasm. (c) Immunohistochemical expression of CD34 in the neoplastic cells mainly membranous and cytoplasmic. (d) A heterogeneous expression of smooth muscle actin in bundles of spindle cells.

 

In Table 1 , sixteen cases of HPC/SFT are recorded. The oldest publication is in 1954 from Peace, and since then, only a few cases have been added. Moreover, since then, the pathology has evolved and now plays a critical role in diagnosing HPC. The mainstay of treatment of HPC/SFT is considered to be complete excision, whenever it is possible.[ 10 , 27 ] In cases where complete excision was feasible, there was no evidence of recurrence after a follow-up of 1 month–5 years.[ 1 , 5 , 6 , 11 , 16 , 39 ] In case a gross total resection (GTR) cannot be performed, some have undergone CHx given the fact that infantile HPC/SFT is chemoresponsive.[ 8 , 25 , 34 , 36 ] CHx has been introduced as either initial treatment, to offer a chance for a GTR, or as a therapy in case of recurrence or incomplete resection.[ 8 , 16 ] Regiments used include combinations of vincristine, etoposide, doxorubicin, cisplatin, methotrexate, cyclophosphamide, actinomycin-D, and ifosfamide.[ 10 ] Radiotherapy (RTx) is also an option for primary or adjuvant therapy of infantile HPC/SFT.[ 25 , 33 , 39 ] Nevertheless, the effectiveness of RTx has been questioned as well as the long-term safety of the radiation dose. A recent study has found that there is no statistical significance in prognosis between GTR alone and GTR with RTx.[ 28 ] Moreover, a radiation dose of >50 Gray (Gy) has not been related to a good prognosis in HPC/SFT RTx, in contrast to the radiation dose of ≤50 Gy.[ 7 , 15 , 25 , 28 , 33 ] In general, the prognosis of infantile HPC/SFT is considered to be favorable,[ 2 , 10 , 27 ] and literature reports a 5-year overall survival of 80% for patients <1 year and 10-year overall survival of 62% for older patients.[ 10 ]


Table 1

Summarized congenital HPC at age of intervention. Sex, size pathology, complications, and follow-up are recorded.

 

CONCLUSIONS

Infantile HPC/SFT is considered to have a benign behavior with a good prognosis. Treatment with GTR is the key to a good prognosis and low rates of recurrence. Nevertheless, GTR is not always feasible. There is no consensus on the therapeutic strategy of a HPC/SFT, which is difficult to be completely resected. CHx before surgery has been proven useful, to make the tumor operable. Moreover, it has been successfully applied as an adjuvant therapy after surgery, or in case of recurrence. RTx has also been used in treating these tumors, but there have been studies that support its ineffectiveness. Literature lacks a therapeutic algorithm for these tumors, and thus, more clinical studies are needed to reach a consensus. In our case, a subtotal resection was performed, which was postoperatively complicated with obstructive hydrocephalus. After a ventriculoperitoneal shunt operation, the patient received CHx.

Declaration of patient consent

The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form, the patient(s) has/have given his/her/their consent for his/her/their images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patients understand that their names and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal their identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

References

1. Aouad N, Vital C, Rivel J, Ramsoubramanian K, Santosh S, Chowdry O. Giant supratentorial meningeal haemangiopericytoma in a newborn. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1991. 112: 154-6

2. Bien E, Stachowicz-Stencel T, Godzinski J, Balcerska A, Izycka-Swieszewska E, Kazanowska B. Retrospective multi-institutional study on hemangiopericytoma in polish children. Pediatr Int. 2009. 51: 19-24

3. Blank W, Spring A, Giesen H, Artmann H. Intracranial hemangiopericytoma in a child. Klin Padiatr. 1988. 200: 422-5

4. Bouvier C, Métellus P, de Paula AM, Vasiljevic A, Jouvet A, Guyotat J. Solitary fibrous tumors and hemangiopericytomas of the meninges:Overlapping pathological features and common prognostic factors suggest the same spectrum of tumors. Brain Pathol. 2012. 22: 511-21

5. Cavalheiro S, Sparapani FV, Moron AF, da Silva MC, Stávale JN. Fetal meningeal hemangiopericytoma. Case report. J Neurosurg. 2002. 97: 1217-20

6. Cole JC, Naul LG. Intracranial infantile hemangiopericytoma. Pediatr Radiol. 2000. 30: 271-3

7. Coppa ND, Raper DM, Zhang Y, Collins BT, Harter KW, Gagnon GJ. Treatment of malignant tumors of the skull base with multi-session radiosurgery. J Hematol Oncol. 2009. 2: 16-

8. del Rosario ML, Saleh A. Preoperative chemotherapy for congenital hemangiopericytoma and a review of the literature. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 1997. 19: 247-50

9. Fernandez-Pineda I, Parida L, Jenkins JJ, Davidoff AM, Rao BN, Rodriguez-Galindo C. Childhood hemangiopericytoma:Review of st jude children's research hospital. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2011. 33: 356-9

10. Ferrari A, Casanova M, Bisogno G, Mattke A, Meazza C, Gronchi A. Hemangiopericytoma in pediatric ages:A report from the italian and german soft tissue sarcoma cooperative group. Cancer. 2001. 92: 2692-8

11. Herzog CE, Leeds NE, Bruner JM, Baumgartner JE. Intracranial hemangiopericytomas in children. Pediatr Neurosurg. 1995. 22: 274-9

12. Hodaie M, Becker L, Teshima I, Rutka JT. Total resection of an intracerebral hemangioendothelioma in an infant. Case report and review of the literature. Pediatr Neurosurg. 2001. 34: 104-12

13. Jänisch W, Haas JF, Schreiber D, Gerlach H. Primary central nervous system tumors in stillborns and infants. Epidemiological considerations. J Neurooncol. 1984. 2: 113-6

14. Jellinger K, Sunder-Plassmann M. Connatal intracranial tumours. Neuropadiatrie. 1973. 4: 46-63

15. Jha N, McNeese M, Barkley HT, Kong J. Does radiotherapy have a role in hemangiopericytoma management?Report of 14 new cases and a review of the literature. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1987. 13: 1399-402

16. Kerl K, Sträter R, Hasselblatt M, Brentrup A, Frühwald MC. Role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in congenital intracranial haemangiopericytoma. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2011. 56: 161-3

17. Kirk IR, Dominguez R, Castillo M. Congenital primary cerebral angiosarcoma:CT, US, and MR findings. Pediatr Radiol. 1992. 22: 134-5

18. Laviv Y, Michowitz S, Schwartz M. Neonatal intracranial hemangiopericytoma:A 7-year follow-up. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2012. 154: 637-8

19. Lee DY, Kim YM, Yoo SJ, Cho BK, Chi JG, Kim IO. Congenital glioblastoma diagnosed by fetal sonography. Childs Nerv Syst. 1999. 15: 197-201

20. Leins AM, Kainer F, Weis S. Sonography and neuropathology of a congenital brain tumor:Report of a rare incident. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2001. 17: 245-7

21. Louis DN, Perry A, Reifenberger G, von Deimling A, Figarella-Branger D, Cavenee WK. The 2016 world health organization classification of tumors of the central nervous system:A summary. Acta Neuropathol. 2016. 131: 803-20

22. McHugh BJ, Baranoski JF, Malhotra A, Vortmeyer AO, Sze G, Duncan CC. Intracranial infantile hemangiopericytoma. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2014. 14: 149-54

23. Mena H, Ribas JL, Enzinger FM, Parisi JE. Primary angiosarcoma of the central nervous system. Study of eight cases and review of the literature. J Neurosurg. 1991. 75: 73-6

24. Nakayama K, Nakamura Y. Localization of congenital glioblastomas in the Japanese:A case report and review of the literature. Childs Nerv Syst. 2002. 18: 149-52

25. Pandey M, Kothari KC, Patel DD. Haemangiopericytoma:Current status, diagnosis and management. Eur J Surg Oncol. 1997. 23: 282-5

26. Peace RJ. A congenital neoplasm of the brain of a newborn infant;report of a case with necropsy. Am J Clin Pathol. 1954. 24: 1272-5

27. Rodriguez-Galindo C, Ramsey K, Jenkins JJ, Poquette CA, Kaste SC, Merchant TE. Hemangiopericytoma in children and infants. Cancer. 2000. 88: 198-204

28. Rutkowski MJ, Sughrue ME, Kane AJ, Aranda D, Mills SA, Barani IJ. Predictors of mortality following treatment of intracranial hemangiopericytoma. J Neurosurg. 2010. 113: 333-9

29. Schiariti M, Goetz P, El-Maghraby H, Tailor J, Kitchen N. Hemangiopericytoma:Long-term outcome revisited. Clinical article. J Neurosurg. 2011. 114: 747-55

30. Semerci SY, Demirel G, Vatansever B, Gundogdu S, Bolukbasi F, Oran G. Urgent surgical management of congenital intracranial hemangiopericytoma in a preterm neonate. Br J Neurosurg. 2017. 22: 1-3

31. Sobel G, Halász J, Bogdányi K, Szabó I, Borka K, Molnár P. Prenatal diagnosis of a giant congenital primary cerebral hemangiopericytoma. Pathol Oncol Res. 2006. 12: 46-9

32. Solitare GB, Krigman MR. Congenital intracranial neoplasm. a case report and review of the literature. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 1964. 23: 280-92

33. Staples JJ, Robinson RA, Wen BC, Hussey DH. Hemangiopericytoma the role of radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1990. 19: 445-51

34. Sultan I, Casanova M, Al-Jumaily U, Meazza C, Rodriguez-Galindo C, Ferrari A. Soft tissue sarcomas in the first year of life. Eur J Cancer. 2010. 46: 2449-56

35. Suzuki Y, Yoshida YK, Shirane R, Yoshimoto T, Watanabe M, Moriya T. Congenital primary cerebral angiosarcoma. Case report. J Neurosurg. 2000. 92: 466-8

36. Toren A, Perlman M, Polak-Charcon S, Avigad I, Katz M, Kuint Y. Congenital hemangiopericytoma/infantile myofibromatosis:Radical surgery versus a conservative “wait and see” approach. Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 1997. 14: 387-93

37. Voth D, Schröder JM, Gutjahr P, Stopfkuchen H, Kühnert A, Günther R. Intracranial hemangiopericytoma in a newborn (author's transl). Z Kinderchir. 1981. 32: 85-90

38. Winters JL, Wilson D, Davis DG. Congenital glioblastoma multiforme:A report of three cases and a review of the literature. J Neurol Sci. 2001. 188: 13-9

39. Wyler AR, Hered J, Smith JR, Loeser JD. Subarachnoid hemorrhage in infancy due to brain tumor. Arch Neurol. 1973. 29: 447-8

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *