Tools

Sricharan Gopakumar, William J. Steele, Matthew Muir, Zain Bhogani, Gavin Britz
  1. Department of Neurosurgery, Baylor College of Medicine, One Baylor Plaza, Houston, TX, United States.
  2. Department of Neurosurgery, Houston Methodist Hospital Neurological Institute, Houston, TX, United States.

Correspondence Address:
Sricharan Gopakumar
Department of Neurosurgery, Baylor College of Medicine, One Baylor Plaza, Houston, TX, United States.

DOI:10.25259/SNI_130_2020

Copyright: © 2020 Surgical Neurology International This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

How to cite this article: Sricharan Gopakumar, William J. Steele, Matthew Muir, Zain Bhogani, Gavin Britz. Intraspinal mesenchymal chondrosarcoma: An argument for aggressive local resection and adjuvant therapy based on review of the literature. 02-May-2020;:95

How to cite this URL: Sricharan Gopakumar, William J. Steele, Matthew Muir, Zain Bhogani, Gavin Britz. Intraspinal mesenchymal chondrosarcoma: An argument for aggressive local resection and adjuvant therapy based on review of the literature. 02-May-2020;:95. Available from: https://surgicalneurologyint.com/surgicalint-articles/9987/

Date of Submission
27-Mar-2020

Date of Acceptance
08-Apr-2020

Date of Web Publication
02-May-2020

Abstract

Background: Mesenchymal chondrosarcoma is a rare cartilaginous neoplasm that typically involves the axial skeleton. Despite a well-circumscribed appearance, this tumor has a tendency to recur both locally and with distant metastases.

Case Description: A 17-year-old patient presented with numbness and paresthesias in the lower extremities attributed to a T10-T11 intradural extramedullary mesenchymal chondrosarcoma. The patient was treated with aggressive local resection and adjuvant therapy. Here, this case and present literature are appropriately reviewed.

Conclusion: Although uncommon, intraspinal mesenchymal chondrosarcomas warrant both radical local resection and aggressive adjuvant therapy with chemoradiation to provide the greatest chance of progression-free survival.

Keywords: Adjuvant therapy, Intradural tumor, Intraspinal, Mesenchymal chondrosarcoma

INTRODUCTION

Mesenchymal chondrosarcomas are rare, primary malignant neoplasms of bone and soft tissues that arise from primitive cartilage forming mesenchymal tissue and are capable of distant metastasis.[ 3 , 10 , 13 ] With an estimated 215 cases per year in the United States, the tumor constitutes 3–10% of all chondrosarcomas.[ 10 , 14 ] Although it grossly appears well-circumscribed with a firm, lobulated outer surface, the tumor is typically invasive.[ 9 ] Despite aggressive local resection, these lesions commonly result in distant metastases with an approximated 10-year survival rate of only 27%.[ 3 , 10 , 13 , 14 ] The high mortality of the disease warrants aggressive management with wide surgical excision followed by adjuvant radiation therapy. With a very limited number of reported intraspinal cases published in the literature, here, we describe the diagnosis and aggressive surgical treatment of a thoracic intradural extramedullary T10-T11 mesenchymal chondrosarcoma in a 17-year-old male.

Patient case

A 17-year-old male presented with a 5-week onset of progressive lower extremity numbness and hyperreflexia attributed to a primary T10-T11 intradural extramedullary mesenchymal chondrosarcoma. Contrast-enhanced T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the thoracic spine showed an intradural posterolateral right-sided lesion at the T10-11 level compressing the spinal cord anteriorly [ Figures 1 and 2 ]. The patient underwent a T10-T11 laminectomy. The tumor was carefully debulked following a durotomy under the microscope. The lesion was completely removed, and the dura around the area of tumor involvement was coagulated. The frozen section diagnosis was a spindle cell neoplasm. The final pathologic diagnosis was extraskeletal mesenchymal chondrosarcoma.


Figure 1:

(a and b) Sagittal (left) and axial (right) T1-weighted gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the thoracic spine reveal an intradural extramedullary homogeneously enhancing mass at the T10-11 level compressing the spinal cord.

 

Figure 2:

Sagittal T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of the thoracic spine reveals a well-circumscribed lesion with a dural tail and a dilated central canal but no evidence of cord edema.

 

Due to the high risk of local tumor recurrence, the patient underwent a second operation with further resection of surrounding tissues.[ 16 ] A large area of overlying dura was removed, surrounding regions were coagulated, and a large dural patch was inserted. The patient did well postoperatively and underwent adjuvant radiation and chemotherapy (fractionated proton therapy 4500 ccGe with a boost of 540 ccGe to the thoracic spine and vincristine/doxorubicin/ ifosfamide × 6 cycles followed by ifosfamide/etoposide × 4 cycles). The patient tolerated these treatments well without incurring any complications.

DISCUSSION

Background

Mesenchymal chondrosarcomas are rare tumors, constituting 25% of all chondrosarcomas in children and adolescents.[ 4 , 10 ] These tumors arise from the pluripotent mesenchymal cell which gives rise to all forms of connective tissue, including the dura and the leptomeninges.[ 8 ] Previous intraspinal cases have been described in patients younger than 20 years of age [ Table 1 ]. While older patients more often have mesenchymal chondrosarcomas in bone, younger patients typically have extraskeletal lesions.[ 10 ]


Table 1:

Previously reported cases of intradural extramedullary mesenchymal chondrosarcoma.

 

Diagnosis

On MRI imaging, these tumors often have extraosseous extension, lytic lesions, poorly defined periosteal reaction, and mottled calcification.[ 6 ] Notably, intraspinal mesenchymal chondrosarcomas with dural attachment have a more favorable prognosis potentially due to early diagnosis from signs and symptoms of acute cord compression.[ 12 ] Histopathologic diagnosis is essential for differentiating cartilage forming mesenchymal tumors including intraspinal mesenchymal chondrosarcomas from other solid tumors such as meningiomas and other cartilaginous lesions,[ 9 ] which is critical as mesenchymal chondrosarcomas have a higher probability of recurrence and metastasis.[ 12 ]

Management

Mesenchymal chondrosarcoma is known to have a late recurrence, sometimes even more than 20 years after the primary tumor occurs.[ 12 ] Surgical management is essential for local control of disease, and better survival rates are seen with wide surgical resection.[ 2 , 12 ] Given the high frequency of local recurrence and the potential presence of tumor cells in the cerebrospinal fluid, postoperative radiation to the tumor bed may be vital in maintaining or prolonging the disease-free period and decreasing the risk of metastasis.[ 9 , 15 ] De Amorim Bernstein et al. used a 60 Gy dose of neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatment to achieve a 79% 10-year overall survival rate.[ 5 ] In addition, Kawaguchi et al. found that the rate of local recurrence was reduced in another cohort of patients receiving 50–59 Gy doses of radiotherapy postoperatively.[ 11 ] Here, we utilized postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy in an effort to prevent local recurrence.

The use of chemotherapy in the treatment of mesenchymal chondrosarcomas in the literature is controversial.[ 16 ] Frezza et al. demonstrated fewer recurrences in patients with localized disease receiving chemotherapy.[ 7 ] In contrast, Bishop et al. suggested that mesenchymal chondrosarcomas are rather chemoresistant with only one in six patients in their cohort responding to treatment, and De Amorin Bernstein et al. demonstrated no statistically significant improvement in disease-free survival.[ 1 , 5 , 11 , 14 ] Nakashima et al. and Kawaguchi et al. also did not observe benefits with chemotherapy in their cohorts. While Cesari et al. demonstrated some effectiveness of chemotherapy, reporting that disease-free survival in patients between 5 and 10 years after surgical excision was 76% with chemotherapy and 17% without chemotherapy, the overall survival rate at 10 years between the two cohorts was not statistically significant.[ 2 ] Given the young age of the patient in our case, adjuvant chemotherapy was included in the aggressive treatment regimen.

CONCLUSION

Intradural extramedullary mesenchymal chondrosarcomas are rare tumors that require prompt diagnosis, aggressive wide surgical excision, and adjuvant radiation and chemotherapy to achieve the best outcomes. Here, a 17-year- old male with a T10-T11 mesenchymal chondrosarcoma underwent a secondary operation with total en bloc resection, including dural removal with patch grafting plus adjuvant chemoradiation to avoid tumor recurrence.

Declaration of patient consent

Patient’s consent not obtained as patients identity is not disclosed or compromised.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

References

1. Bishop MW, Somerville JM, Bahrami A, Kaste SC, Interiano RB, Wu J. Mesenchymal chondrosarcoma in children and young adults: A single institution retrospective review. Sarcoma. 2015. 2015: 608279-

2. Cesari M, Bertoni F, Bacchini P, Mercuri M, Palmerini E, Ferrari S. Mesenchymal chondrosarcoma. An analysis of patients treated at a single institution. Tumori. 2007. 93: 423-7

3. Chan HS, Turner-Gomes SO, Chuang SH, Fitz CR, Daneman A, Martin DJ. A rare cause of spinal cord compression in childhood from intraspinal mesenchymal chondrosarcoma. A report of two cases and review of the literature. Neuroradiology. 1984. 26: 323-7

4. Dabska M, Huvos AG. Mesenchymal chondrosarcoma in the young. Virchows Arch A Pathol Anat Histopathol. 1983. 399: 89-104

5. De Amorim Bernstein K, Liebsch N, Chen YL, Niemierko A, Schwab JH, Raskin K. Clinical outcomes for patients after surgery and radiation therapy for mesenchymal chondrosarcomas. J Surg Oncol. 2016. 114: 982-6

6. Douis H, Saifuddin A. The imaging of cartilaginous bone tumours. II. Chondrosarcoma. Skeletal Radiol. 2013. 42: 611-26

7. Frezza AM, Cesari M, Baumhoer D, Biau D, Bielack S, Campanacci DA. Mesenchymal chondrosarcoma: Prognostic factors and outcome in 113 patients. A European musculoskeletal oncology society study. Eur J Cancer. 2015. 51: 374-81

8. Fu YS, Kay S. A comparative ultrastructural study of mesenchymal chondrosarcoma and myxoid chondrosarcoma. Cancer. 1974. 33: 1531-42

9. Harsh GR, Wilson CB. Central nervous system mesenchymal chondrosarcoma. Case report. J Neurosurg. 1984. 61: 375-81

10. Huvos AG, Rosen G, Dabska M, Marcove RC. Mesenchymal chondrosarcoma. A clinicopathologic analysis of 35 patients with emphasis on treatment. Cancer. 1983. 51: 1230-7

11. Kawaguchi S, Weiss I, Lin PP, Huh WW, Lewis VO. Radiation therapy is associated with fewer recurrences in mesenchymal chondrosarcoma. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014. 472: 856-64

12. Lee ST, Lui TN, Tsai MD. Primary intraspinal dura mesenchymal chondrosarcoma. Surg Neurol. 1989. 31: 54-7

13. Lichtenstein L, Bernstein D. Unusual benign and malignant chondroid tumors of bone. A survey of some mesenchymal cartilage tumors and malignant chondroblastic tumors, including a few multicentric ones, as well as many atypical benign chondroblastomas and chondromyxoid fibromas. Cancer. 1959. 12: 1142-57

14. Nakashima Y, Unni KK, Shives TC, Swee RG, Dahlin DC. Mesenchymal chondrosarcoma of bone and soft tissue. A review of 111 cases. Cancer. 1986. 57: 2444-53

15. Obuchowicz AK, Szumera-Ciećkiewicz A, Ptaszyński K, Rutynowska-Pronicka O, Madziara W, Tiszler-Cieślik E. Intraspinal mesenchymal chondrosarcoma in a 14-year-old patient: Diagnostic and therapeutic problems in relation to the review of literature. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2012. 34: e188-92

16. Rushing EJ, Armonda RA, Ansari Q, Mena H. Mesenchymal chondrosarcoma: A clinicopathologic and flow cytometric study of 13 cases presenting in the central nervous system. Cancer. 1996. 77: 1884-91

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *