Hirotomo Tanaka1, Yoshiyuki Takaishi1, Shinichi Miura2, Takashi Mizowaki1, Takeshi Kondoh1, Takashi Sasayama2
  1. Department of Neurosurgery, Shinsuma General Hospital,
  2. Department of Neurosurgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe,

Correspondence Address:
Hirotomo Tanaka, Department of Neurosurgery, Shinsuma General Hospital, Kobe, Japan.


Copyright: © 2022 Surgical Neurology International This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, transform, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

How to cite this article: Hirotomo Tanaka1, Yoshiyuki Takaishi1, Shinichi Miura2, Takashi Mizowaki1, Takeshi Kondoh1, Takashi Sasayama2. Long-term recurrence after surgery for schwannoma of the cauda equina. 23-Jun-2022;13:272

How to cite this URL: Hirotomo Tanaka1, Yoshiyuki Takaishi1, Shinichi Miura2, Takashi Mizowaki1, Takeshi Kondoh1, Takashi Sasayama2. Long-term recurrence after surgery for schwannoma of the cauda equina. 23-Jun-2022;13:272. Available from:

Date of Submission

Date of Acceptance

Date of Web Publication


Background: Cauda equina tumors are rare primary spinal tumors. Histologically, the most common tumor arising from the cauda equina is a schwannoma. However, little is known about the long-term postoperative outcomes of cauda equina schwannoma. Here, we reviewed the median-to-long-term postoperative outcomes of eight of our own patients with schwannomas of the cauda equina.

Methods: Between 2007 and 2020, we, retrospectively, reviewed eight patients with cauda equina schwannomas (CESs) undergoing nine operations at our institution. There were five males and three females averaging 56.5 years of age who were followed for over 40 postoperative months. The study included assessment of the following variables: the modified McCormick scale, tumor size, location, extent of resection, treatment of the tumor involving nerve roots, and postoperative observational follow-up.

Results: Gross-total resection was achieved in all eight patients; none received adjuvant therapy. The involved nerve roots were completely sacrificed in seven patients and partially resected in one. During a median follow-up of 108 months, only one patient sustained a tumor recurrence 164 months following the index surgery.

Conclusion: CESs may recur more than 10 years after the original surgery. Radical resection of the tumor, including complete removal of the involved nerve root during the index surgery, and long-term postoperative follow-up is, therefore, essential.

Keywords: Cauda equina schwannoma, Median-to-long-term outcome, Recurrence, Surgery


Cauda equina schwannomas (CESs) are rare benign tumors that typically precipitate cauda equina syndromes characterized by low back pain, lower extremity sensory/motor disturbances, gait imbalance, and/or bladder/bowel dysfunction. Large or symptomatic CES often warrant surgical resection, but currently, there is no clear role for adjuvant therapy.[ 10 ] To limit tumor recurrence, CES surgery should include initial gross-total tumor removal with sacrifice of the involved nerve root performed utilizing intraoperative electrophysiological monitoring (i.e., to reduce neurological perioperative/postoperative morbidity). Here, we reviewed eight patients who originally presented with cauda equina syndrome attributed to schwannomas to determine the median-to-long-term postoperative recurrence rates and time to recurrence over the median follow-up duration of 108 months.


From 2007 to 2012, we, retrospectively, evaluated eight patients who originally presented with cauda equina syndrome due to schwannomas (CES). Our analysis specifically included assessment of their median-to-long-term postoperative incidence and time to recurrence. All tumors were the WHO grade 1, and all were followed for >40 months after the index surgery. We evaluated the following variables: preoperative neurologic/radiologic findings, modified McCormick scales, extent of resection of the tumor and the tumor-involved nerve root, the use of intraoperative electromyography (i.e., last three cases), and postoperative observational time. Surgery included microsurgical laminotomies (i.e., for the first five cases) and laminectomies (i.e., for the last three cases). All patients underwent postoperative lumbar magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) repeated every 6–12 months over a median follow-up duration of 108 months.

Preoperative data in eight cases

Preoperative symptoms in all eight patients included: low back, buttock, and lower extremity pain, and/or numbness [ Table 1 ]. The mean preoperative modified McCormick scale score was 1.75. On MR studies, the mean tumor size was 25.4 mm, and most tumors were located between the L2-4 levels; one patient had an intratumoral cyst.

Table 1:

Clinical summary of patients.



Although gross-total resection (GTR) was accomplished in eight patients, the tumor-involved nerve roots were fully resected in seven, but just partially removed in one. Postoperatively, two patients exhibited transient and mild motor weakness of the lower extremities. After a median postoperative follow-up time of 108 months for all eight patients, only one patient experienced a tumor recurrence at 164 postoperative months.

Single case report

A 29-year-old woman with low back pain and numbness of both lower extremities had an original MRI demonstrating a cauda equina tumor at the L2–L4 levels measuring 55 mm in diameter with rim-enhancing cyst [ Figures 1a and b ]. During an osteoplastic L2-4 laminotomy, the tumor-involved nerve roots were sacrificed; the pathologic diagnosis was schwannoma (the WHO grade 1). The postoperative lumbar MRI demonstrated no residual tumor, and she was discharged neurologically intact [ Figures 1c and d ]. The patient was followed with a gadolinium-enhanced MR scans every 6 months. She was tumor free for 2 years, but was then lost to follow-up. Over 13 years later, she returned with a cauda equina syndrome/compression due to a massive L3– L4 recurrent MR-documented CES (i.e., intradural cystic lesion) [ Figures 2a and b ]. Despite marked adhesions to multiple nerve roots, the tumor was fully excised [ Figures 2c and d ]. The pathologic diagnosis of the specimen obtained from the second surgery was unchanged: again, a WHO Grade 1 schwannoma with a Ki-67 labeling index of <5% [ Figure 3 ].

Figure 1:

The mid-sagittal view of lumbar MR images before (a and b) and after (c and d) the first surgery. Preoperative T2-weighted (a) and Gd-enhanced T1-weighted (b) images demonstrating intradural cystic tumors at the L2-4 level (white arrowhead). Postoperative T2-weighted (a) and Gd-enhanced T1-weighted (b) images showing no residual tumor.


Figure 2:

The mid-sagittal view of lumbar MR images before (a, b) and after (c, d) the second surgery. T2-weighted (a) and Gd-enhanced T1-weighted (b) images showing tumor recurrence at the levels of L3-4 (white arrowhead). Postoperative T2-weighted (c) and Gd-enhanced T1-weighted (d) images showing the total removal of the recurrent tumor.


Figure 3:

Histopathologic examination of the recurrent tumor. Hematoxylin and eosin-stained sections (a and b) showing spindle cells with myxoid change. Immunohistochemical stains; S-100 (c) and Ki-67 (d).



Postoperative delayed recurrence for CES

Spinal schwannomas, accounting for 31–49% of cauda equina tumors in adults, are the third most common primary tumor of the spinal cord, meninges, and cauda equina.[ 3 , 5 , 12 ] Further, they are typically well-defined benign tumors that are often treated with surgery alone.[ 3 , 8 , 12 ] Nevertheless, there are reports of delayed recurrences of spinal schwannomas [ Table 2 ].[ 1 , 9 , 12 ] Wager et al. reported total removal in over 99% of patients with CES; a low recurrence rate suggested that imaging beyond 24 months were not required.[ 12 ] Asazuma et al. showed that recurrence rate of benign spinal schwannomas was 14 out of 117 patients over a follow-up period of 64 months; they emphasized the benefit of the initial “radical” tumor excision as the extent of excision in all 14 recurrent cases was incomplete or not known.[ 1 ] In our series, all eight patients underwent initial GTR; a recurrence was observed in only one patient 13 years later.

Table 2:

Previous reports of recurrence of spinal schwannomas.


Cause of recurrent CES

Although there are likely several causes for recurrent CES, the most likely factors include: relatively large tumor size, adherence to surrounding nerves resulting in initial partial resections (i.e., attempted preservation of the tumor-involved nerve root thus leaving behind a nidus for recurrence), and cyst formation increasing the risk of “tumor spillage” during the index surgical resection. Lee et al. reported that triggered electromyogram and neurophysiological monitoring provide ideal intraoperative data for deciding whether or not to sacrifice the rootlet.[ 8 ]

Adjunctive therapy

There are a few isolated reports regarding the potential efficacy of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for benign spinal tumors.[ 2 , 4 , 6 , 7 , 11 ] Specifically, Chin et al. conducted that a retrospective study of 149 benign spinal tumors, including 39 meningiomas, 26 neurofibromas, and 84 schwannomas, demonstrated that SRS resulted in local control rates of 95% and 88% at 5 and 10 years, respectively.[ 2 ]


We present a case series of eight patients with CES, one of whom experienced recurrence more than 13 years after surgery. This finding should suggest that longer-term follow-up for over 10 years may be necessary to detect recurrent CES.

Declaration of patient consent

The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent.

Financial support and sponsorship


Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.


1. Asazuma T, Toyama Y, Watanabe M, Suzuki N, Fujimura Y, Hirabayashi K. Clinical features associated with recurrence of tumours of the spinal cord and cauda equina. Spinal Cord. 2003. 41: 85-9

2. Chin AL, Fujimoto D, Kumar KA, Tupper L, Mansour S, Chang SD. Long-term update of stereotactic radiosurgery for benign spinal tumors. Neurosurgery. 2019. 85: 708-16

3. Das S, John KD, Urevick AJ, Yusuf MB, Wang D, Ugiliweneza B. Tumors in the cauda equina: A SEER analysis of tumor types and predictors of outcome. J Clin Neurosci. 2020. 81: 227-33

4. Dodd RL, Ryu MR, Kamnerdsupaphon P, Gibbs IC, Chang SD, Adler JR. CyberKnife radiosurgery for benign intradural extramedullary spinal tumors. Neurosurgery. 2006. 58: 674-85

5. Engelhard HH, Villano JL, Porter KR, Stewart AK, Barua M, Barker FG. Clinical presentation, histology, and treatment in 430 patients with primary tumors of the spinal cord, spinal meninges, or cauda equina. J Neurosurg Spine. 2010. 13: 67-77

6. Gerszten PC, Burton SA, Ozhasoglu C, McCue KJ, Quinn AE. Radiosurgery for benign intradural spinal tumors. Neurosurgery. 2008. 62: 887-95

7. Gerszten PC, Quader M, Novotny J, Flickinger JC. Radiosurgery for benign tumors of the spine: Clinical experience and current trends. Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2012. 11: 133-9

8. Lee S, Cho DC, Rhim SC, Lee BJ, Hong SH, Koo YS. Intraoperative monitoring for Cauda Equina tumors: Surgical outcomes and neurophysiological data accrued over 10 years. Neurospine. 2021. 18: 281-9

9. Parlak A, Oppong MD, Jabbarli R, Gembruch O, Dammann P, Wrede K. Do Tumour size, type and localisation affect resection rate in patients with spinal schwannoma?. Medicina (Kaunas). 2022. 58: 357

10. Perez-Pinto F, Abaunza-Camacho JF, Vergara-Garcia D, Benavides C, Riveros WM, Laverde L. Management of recurrent schwannoma of the cauda equina: A case report. Surg Neurol Int. 2021. 12: 312

11. Shin DW, Sohn MJ, Kim HS, Lee DJ, Jeon SR, Hwang YJ. Clinical analysis of spinal stereotactic radiosurgery in the treatment of neurogenic tumors. J Neurosurg Spine. 2015. 23: 429-37

12. Wager M, Lapierre F, Blanc JL, Listrat A, Bataille B. Cauda equina tumors: A French multicenter retrospective review of 231 adult cases and review of the literature. Neurosurg Rev. 2000. 23: 119-29

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *