- Department of Anesthesiology, Advocate Illinois Masonic Medical Center, Chicago, IL 60504, USA
- Department of Anesthesiology, JHS Hospital of Cook County, Chicago, IL 60504, USA
- Ghaly Neurosurgical Associates, Aurora, IL 60504, USA
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Illinois, Chicago, IL 60504, USA
Ramsis F. Ghaly
Department of Anesthesiology, Advocate Illinois Masonic Medical Center, Chicago, IL 60504, USA
Department of Anesthesiology, University of Illinois, Chicago, IL 60504, USA
DOI:10.4103/2152-7806.98504Copyright: © 2012 Ghaly RF. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
How to cite this article: Ghaly RF, Candido KD, Chupatanakul L, Knezevic NN. Magnetic resonance imaging is essential prior to spinal subarachnoid blockade for parturients with a history of brain tumor resection undergoing cesarean section. Surg Neurol Int 14-Jul-2012;3:75
How to cite this URL: Ghaly RF, Candido KD, Chupatanakul L, Knezevic NN. Magnetic resonance imaging is essential prior to spinal subarachnoid blockade for parturients with a history of brain tumor resection undergoing cesarean section. Surg Neurol Int 14-Jul-2012;3:75. Available from: http://sni.wpengine.com/surgicalint_articles/magnetic-resonance-imaging-is-essential-prior-to-spinal-subarachnoid-blockade-for-parturients-with-a-history-of-brain-tumor-resection-undergoing-cesarean-section/
Background:Primary brain tumors are usually treated by surgical removal with the goal of complete resection within the constraints of preservation of neurological function. However, gross total resection may not mean complete tumor removal, and ongoing compression from a mass effect can lead to serious sequelae. Spinal subarachnoid blockade is contraindicated in patients with brain tumors or space occupying lesions.
Case Description:A 32-year-old full term parturient presented to Labor and Delivery for semi-urgent repeat cesarean section. Three months ago, she underwent resection of a benign brain tumor and recovered with no new neurological deficits. The neurosurgeon was consulted by the anesthesia team and stated that the tumor was completely extirpated. Since there was no postoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and the patient still had some neurological deficits, the anesthesia team decided to proceed with a general anesthetic using a rapid sequence induction and intubation. Mild hyperventilation to maintain an end-tidal CO2 of 30 mmHg was selected and conservative fluid management was maintained. Postcesarean MRI revealed residual tumor compressing the brain stem and a loculated cyst. If a spinal subarachnoid blockade technique had been selected, the risk of uncal herniation, based on the postoperative MRI findings, may have been realized.
Conclusions:The present case demonstrates the necessity of a comprehensive and thorough review prior to selecting the anesthetic approach to mange the patients with a history of brain tumor resection. Postoperative MR imaging should be performed to evaluate the extent of tumor resection and possible existence of residual tumor.
Keywords: Choroid plexus tumor, pregnancy, postoperative magnetic resonance imaging, Spinal subarachnoid blockade
The incidence of primary brain tumors in pregnancy is extremely uncommon, and there is no difference in the relative types encountered during pregnancy.[
Surgical removal is recommended with the goal of either total removal or removal as much as possible to achieve the best survival. Although the perioperative neurosurgeon may perceive that the entire tumor has been removed, the gross total resection may not conform to 100% tumor removal. There are reports of residual tumor identified using postoperative MRIs, when the neurosurgeon believed that the tumor had been totally resected.[
The anesthetic concerns in patients with brain tumors are related to the increase of intracerebral pressure and cerebrospinal fluid pressure. If the choice of anesthetic technique is made based upon the perception of the neurosurgeon that a tumor has been completely removed, serious sequelae from an unrecognized ongoing mass effect may occur. Spinal subarachnoid blockade is contraindicated in any patients who has a brain tumor or space occupying lesion which might cause brain tonsillar herniation.[
We present a case of a parturient at full-term who had the assurance from her neurosurgeon that there had been complete brain tumor removal, who presented for repeat cesarean section (C/S). We describe the management of this case and provide the recommendation for patients with a history of brain tumor removal to proceed to a general anesthetic. A week following the C/S, MRI revealed that 40% of residual tumor volume remained with ongoing brainstem compression.
A 32-year-old full term pregnant woman presented for semi-urgent repeat Cesarean Section due to a previous low transverse incision and chorioamnionitis. The patient had a history of having had a benign brain tumor resection three months previously. She had had symptoms of increasing headaches, inability to fully control and coordinate her left leg and left arm motor function; ataxic gait; blurred vision; loss of hearing in the left ear; facial numbness; and left ophthalmoplegia. An MRI of the brain prior to surgery revealed a left heterogeneous enhancing mass on the left cerebello-pontine angle (CPA) region with significant mass effect on the brainstem [
However, when presenting in active labor, the patient continued to suffer from residual and multiple neurological deficits with no resolution since the brain surgery. The operative neurosurgeon was contacted by the anesthesia team and he stated that the tumor had been totally removed and that the patient had no further mass effect. There was no time to perform an MRI prior to cesarean section. After case discussion with the obstetric surgeon and a neuroanesthesiologist, general anesthesia was chosen. The patient was in a left lateral uterine displacement position, and standard ASA monitors were applied. A rapid sequence induction with cricoid pressure was performed using 200 mg of propofol IV, 100 mcg of fentanyl IV, and 80 mg of succinylcholine IV after 40 mg of lidocaine IV. The trachea was easily intubated, and anesthesia was maintained using 1 MAC of sevoflurane with a propofol infusion at 50 mcg/kg/min, fentanyl 3 mcg/kg and O2. Mild hyperventilation to produce an end tidal CO2 of 30 mmHg and crystalloids were used to prevent a possible sudden increase in intracranial pressure. A healthy infant was delivered with Apgar scores at 1 and 5 minutes of 9/9. The operative course was unremarkable and the patient remained stable throughout the procedure. The trachea was extubated and the patient had an unchanged neurological status similar to her preinduction examination without development of any new neurological deficits or any increase in headache intensity following operative delivery.
One week postoperatively, the MRI with and without contrast revealed a residual mass (measuring 2.5 × 1.6 × 2.2 cm3) at the level of the very thin left middle cerebellar peduncle. An associated extra axial cyst located anterior to the mass and on the left aspect of the pons and medulla measured 1.5 × 1.7 cm2. Mass effects on the left aspect of the pons, medulla and the cisternal segments of cranial nerves VII and VIII were also identified [Figures
Choroid plexus tumors (CPT) are rare epithelial brain tumors which account for 0.4%-0.6% of all intracranial tumors.[
Management of brain tumors during pregnancy presents a dilemma and depends basically on the patient's condition. If the diagnosis is made by identifying symptoms provoked by intracranial hypertension or observing neurological deficits, tumor removal should be performed immediately as in the present case. However, complete removal may be difficult because of physiological changes during pregnancy such as increasing progesterone and estrogen receptors which are able to accelerate the tumor growth.[
Intraoperative and postoperative MRI are the essential gold standard techniques to accurately estimate residual mass and confirm the extent of tumor resection, even though some patients who received intraoperative MRI have had unsuspected results of residual tumor.[
Studies have supported the finding that intraoperative MRI is more helpful to localize, determine tumor margins, achieve the proportion of complete removal and help monitor probable intraoperative complications, when compare with intraoperative ultrasound or postoperative CT scan.[
However, there is no current standardized guideline for frequency of follow up using postoperative MRI in CPT. There is the suggestion that using MRI T2/FLAIR signal and pre- and post-gadolinium infusions appears to enhance detection of abnormally enhancing brain tumor,[
Regional anesthesia for C-section surgery is universally preferred with some advantages over general anesthesia such as reduced risks of aspiration and hemorrhage,[
The anesthetic choice in this case was selected after the anesthesiologist reviewed all the available data including indication for the Cesarean Section, urgency of surgery, the patient's general medical status and all available imaging. General anesthesia was chosen for C/S based primarily on the patient's clinical exam revealing ongoing neurological deficits, and the fact that there was no postoperative MRI done in the three month interval between the brain surgery and C/S. Post C/S MRI confirmed the residual tumor adherent to the brainstem and an entrapped cyst exerting significant brainstem compression. In this case, the foramen magnum was not removed during the previous brain surgery and the craniocervical junction was rather narrow. If acceptance of the language in the dictated operative report of “complete tumor resection” had been made and if a subarachnoid neuraxial blockade had been performed, serious sequelae including possible tonsillar herniation through the tight foramen magnum would likely have taken place.
We suggest that every patient who undergoes brain tumor resection should have serial follow-up postoperative MRIs or at least one controlled MRI following surgery. If the pathohistology reports confirm that the patient had a benign brain tumor, the patient fully recovers from neurological deficit, and post-operative MRI shows no residual tumor left behind, then further MRI follow up may not be necessary. However, if the pathohistology reports identifies a malignant brain tumor, or if the patient has ongoing neurological deficits, immediate postoperative MRI is not sufficient to confirm the totality of tumor resection. Serial and contemporaneous MRIs should be performed to evaluate the possible residual tumor, and the timing of follow up depends on the type of tumor. Operative estimation of the extent of brain tumor by an operating neurosurgeon may not be accurate and the selection of anesthesia should not be made on the perception or estimation of the neurosurgeon alone that the tumor has been completely removed. In any cases where there is doubt about possible residual tumor possibly exerting a mass effect, precesarean section MRI prior to spinal subarachnoid blockade should be performed and reviewed by the anesthesiologist. Even though some authors report excellent results of using epidural analgesia in patients with brain tumors, we need to be cognizant that higher volumes of local anesthetics injected and the possibility for unintentional dural puncture may cause serious complications. We suggest that general anesthesia and avoidance of spinal subarachnoid blockade should be the technique of choice for patients with brain tumors to prevent serious sequelae including possible brain herniation and the associated severe morbidity or mortality.
We thank Mohamad Khan, MD for helping in the manuscript preparation.
1. Albert FK, Forsting M, Sartor K, Adams HP, Kunze S. Early postoperative magnetic resonance imaging after resection of malignant glioma: Objective evaluation of residual tumor and its influence on regrowth and prognosis. Neurosurgery. 1994. 34: 45-60
2. Afolabi BB, Lesi FE, Merah NA. Regional versus general anaesthesia for caesarean section. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2010. p. CD004350-
3. Bagga R, Jain V, Das CP, Gupta KR, Gopalan S, Malhotra S. Choice of therapy and mode of delivery in idiopathic intracranial hypertension during pregnancy. Med Gen Med. 2005. 7: 42-
4. Belhawi SM, Hoefnagels FW, Baaijen JC, Aliaga ES, Reijneveld JC, Heimans JJ. Early postoperative MRI overestimates residual tumor after resection of gliomas with no or minimal enhancement. Eur Radiol. 2011. 21: 1526-34
5. Black PM, Moriarty T, Alexander E, Stieg P, Woodard EJ, Gleason PL. Development and implementation of intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging and its neurosurgical applications. Neurosurgery. 1997. 41: 831-42
6. Forsting M, Albert FK, Kunze S, Adams HP, Zenner D, Sartor K. Extirpation of glioblastomas: MR and CT follow-up of residual tumor and regrowth patterns. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1993. 14: 77-87
7. Ghaly RF, Candido KD, Sauer R, Knezevic NN. Anesthetic management during Cesarean section in a woman with residual Arnold-Chiari malformation Type I, cervical kyphosis, and syringomyelia. Surg Neurol Int. 2012. 3: 26-
8. Goo HW, Choi CG. Post-contrast FLAIR MR imaging of the brain in children: Normal and abnormal intracranial enhancement. Pediatr Radiol. 2003. 33: 843-9
9. Hilt H, Gramm HJ, Link J. Changes in intracranial pressure associated with extradural anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 1986. 58: 676-80
10. Kassam SH, Hadi HA, Fadel HE, Sims W, Jay WM. Benign intracranial hypertension in pregnancy: Current diagnostic and therapeutic approach. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 1983. 38: 314-21
11. Khoddami M, Gholampour Shahaboddini R. Choroid plexus papilloma of the cerebellopontine angle. Arch Iran Med. 2010. 13: 552-5
12. Knauth M, Wirtz CR, Tronnier VM, Aras N, Kunze S, Sartor K. Intraoperative MR imaging increases the extent of tumor resection in patients with high-grade gliomas. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1999. 20: 1642-6
13. Knauth M, Wirtz CR, Tronnier VM, Staubert A, Kunze S, Sartor K. Intraoperative magnetic resonance tomography for control of extent of neurosurgical operations. Radiologe. 1998. 38: 218-24
14. Kumar R, Achari G, Benerji D, Jain VK, Chhabra DK. Choroid plexus papillomas of the cerebellopontine angle. Neurol India. 2002. 50: 352-8
15. López R, Nazar C, Sandoval P, Guerrero I, Mellado P, Lacassie HJ. Neuraxial analgesia during labor in a patient with Arnold-chiari type I malformation and syringomyelia. Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim. 2007. 54: 317-21
16. Mathews VP, Caldemeyer KS, Lowe MJ, Greenspan SL, Weber DM, Ulmer JL. Brain:gadolinium-enhanced fast fluid-attenuated inversion-recovery MR imaging. Radiology. 1999. 211: 257-63
17. Nel MR, Robson V, Robinson PN. Extradural anaesthesia for caesarean section in a patient with syringomyelia and chiari type I anomaly. Br J Anaesth. 1998. 80: 512-5
18. Poisson M, Pertuiset BF, Hauw JJ, Philippon J, Buge A, Moguilewsky M. Steroid hormone receptors in human meningiomas, gliomas and brain metastases. J Neurooncol. 1983. 1: 179-89
19. Pravdenkova S, Al-Mefty O, Sawyer J, Husain M. Progesterone and estrogen receptors: Opposing prognostic indicators in meningiomas. J Neurosurg. 2006. 105: 163-73
20. Rickert CH, Paulus W. Tumors of the choroid plexus. Microsc Res Tech. 2001. 52: 104-11
21. Simon RH. Brain tumors in pregnancy. Semin Neurol. 1988. 8: 214-21
22. Steinmeier R, Fahlbusch R, Ganslandt O, Nimsky C, Buchfelder M, Kaus M. Intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging with the magnetom open scanner: Concepts, neurosurgical indications, and procedures: A preliminary report. Neurosurgery. 1998. 43: 739-47
23. Strother DR, Pollack IF, Fisher PG, Hunter JV, Woo SY, Pomeroy SL, Pizzo P, Poplack D.editors. Tumors of the central nervous system. Principles and Practice of Pediatric Oncology. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2002. p. 751-
24. Su TM, Lan CM, Yang LC, Lee TC, Wang KW, Hung KS. Brain tumor presenting with fatal herniation following delivery under epidural anesthesia. Anesthesiology. 2002. 96: 508-9
25. Tsementzis SA, Tsementzis SA.editors. Neuroradiology. Differential Diagnosis in Neurology and Neurosurgery. New York: Georg Thieme Verlag; 2000. p. 41-2
26. Wolff JE, Sajedi M, Brant R, Coppes MJ, Egeler RM. Choroid plexus tumors. Br J Cancer. 2002. 87: 1086-91