Tools

Sílvio Sarmento Lessa1, José Ernesto Chang Mulato1, Hugo Leonardo Dória-Netto1, Raphael Wuo-Silva1, José Maria Campos Filho1, Feres Chaddad-Neto1,2
  1. Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Universidade Federal de São Paulo,
  2. Hospital Beneficência Portuguesa de São Paulo, São Paulo – SP, Brazil.

Correspondence Address:
Feres Chaddad-Neto, Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Universidade Federal de São paulo, São Paulo – SP, Brazil.

DOI:10.25259/SNI_90_2022

Copyright: © 2022 Surgical Neurology International This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, transform, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

How to cite this article: Sílvio Sarmento Lessa1, José Ernesto Chang Mulato1, Hugo Leonardo Dória-Netto1, Raphael Wuo-Silva1, José Maria Campos Filho1, Feres Chaddad-Neto1,2. Microsurgery for a medial left giant lesser sphenoid wing meningioma complicated by postoperative vasospasm of the ipsilateral supraclinoid carotid artery. 31-Mar-2022;13:113

How to cite this URL: Sílvio Sarmento Lessa1, José Ernesto Chang Mulato1, Hugo Leonardo Dória-Netto1, Raphael Wuo-Silva1, José Maria Campos Filho1, Feres Chaddad-Neto1,2. Microsurgery for a medial left giant lesser sphenoid wing meningioma complicated by postoperative vasospasm of the ipsilateral supraclinoid carotid artery. 31-Mar-2022;13:113. Available from: https://surgicalneurologyint.com/?post_type=surgicalint_articles&p=11508

Date of Submission
22-Jan-2022

Date of Acceptance
03-Mar-2022

Date of Web Publication
31-Mar-2022

Abstract

Background: Sphenoid wing meningiomas present close contact with intracranial arteries and have great potential for vascular complications. Here, we describe the case of a patient who presented a medial left giant lesser sphenoid wing meningioma involving the supraclinoid carotid artery. One week after surgery, she developed vasospasm whose treatment using milrinone achieved excellent results.

Case Description: This is the case of a 23-year-old female with a large meningioma of the middle third of the lesser wing of the left sphenoid. Furthermore, the patient had symptoms of headache, diplopia, and left amaurosis (Video 1). The lesion involved the supraclinoid left carotid artery, causing significant stenosis of the vessel. The patient underwent surgical treatment without complications. One week after the procedure, she evolved with lowered level of consciousness, complete, and proportionate right hemiparesis and right Babinski’s sign. Angiographic study demonstrated significant stenosis of the left supraclinoid artery. After endovascular treatment with milrinone, the patient evolved with immediate improvement of signs and symptoms.

Conclusion: Giant meningiomas with vascular involvement involve a higher risk of postoperative vascular complications. Other studies should be carried out to predict these complications and thus develop preventive measures.

Keywords: Endovascular treatment, Giant sphenoid wing meningioma, Microsurgery, Vascular encasement, Vasospasm

Video 1

Annotations[1-10]

0:13 – Clinical presentation

0:39 – Neurological examination

0:44 – Neuroimage findings

2:05 – Rationale for procedure

2:29 – Risks of the procedure and its potential benefits

3:12 – Alternatives and why they were not chosen

4:05 – Description of the setup

4:25 – Necessary equipment

4:36 – Key surgical steps

4:42 – Video

7:02 – Disease background

8:12 – A brief review of clinical and image outcome.

Declaration of patient consent

The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

Video available on:

https://doi.org/10.25259/SNI_90_2022

Acknowledgments

I would like to thank Prof. Feres Chaddad Neto for his constant support, motivation, and guidance during the execution of this work. He is not only my boss but also my mentor. In addition, I would like to thank the rest of the team for their effort and dedication. I would also like to thank the Federal University of São Paulo for opening the doors allowing me to be part of it.

References

1. Balase A, Hurghis C, Tamas F, Chinezu R. Surgical strategies and clinical outcome of large to giant sphenoid wing meningiomas: A case series study. Brain Sci. 2020. 10: 957

2. Behari S, Giri PJ, Shukla D, Jain VK, Banerji D. Surgical strategies for giant medial sphenoid wing meningiomas: A new scoring system for predicting extent of resection. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2008. 150: 865-77

3. Brastianos PK, Galanis E, Butowski N, Chan JW, Dunn IF, Goldbrunner R. Advances in multidisciplinary therapy for meningiomas. Neuro Oncol. 2019. 21: i18-31

4. Bulsara KR, Patel T, Fukushima T. Cerebral bupass surgery for skull base lesions: Technical notes incorporating lessons learned over two decades. Neurosurg Focus. 2008. 24: E11

5. Chaddad-Neto F, Doria-Netto HL, Filho JM, Neto MR, Silva-Costa MD, Oliveira E. Orbitozygomatic craniotomy in three pieces: Tips and tricks. Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2016. 74: 228-34

6. Goldsmith B, McDemott MW. Meningioma. Clin N Am. 2006. 17: 111-20

7. McCracken DJ, Higginbotham RA, Boulter JH, Liu Y, Wells JA, Halani SH. Degree of vascular encasement in sphenoid wing meningiomas predicts postoperative ischemic complications. Neurosurgery. 2017. 80: 957-66

8. Mooney MA, Ibn Essayed W, Aziz-Sultan MA, Al-Mefty O. Concomitant embolization and microsurgical resection of a giant, hypervascular skull base meningioma: 2-Dimensional operative video. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown). 2021. 21: E97-8

9. Slot KM, Verbaan D, Bosscher L, Sanchez E, Vandertrop WP, Peerdeman SM. Agreement between extent of meningioma resection based on surgical Simpson grade on postoperative magnetic resonance imaging findings. World Neurosurg. 2018. 111: e856-62

10. Yang J, Ma SC, Liu YH, Wei L, Zhang CY, Qi JF. Large and giant medial sphenoid wing meningiomas involving vascular structures: Clinical features and management experience in 53 patients. Chin Med J (Engl). 2013. 126: 4470-6

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.