- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California-Irvine, 101 The City Dr S, Orange, CA, United States
- Department of Biological Sciences, Seton Hall University, South Orange, NJ, United States
- Department of Neurology, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI, United States
- Department of Neurosurgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins Whiting School of Engineering, Baltimore, MD, United States
Correspondence Address:
Julian Lassiter Gendreau, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins Whiting School of Engineering, Baltimore, MD, USA.
DOI:10.25259/SNI_112_2025
Copyright: © 2025 Surgical Neurology International This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, transform, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.How to cite this article: Nolan J. Brown1, Saarang Patel2, Taylor Kenton Reardon3, James L. Rogers4, Julian Lassiter Gendreau5. Operative considerations for resection of pituitary adenoma in patients with sickle cell disease: A retrospective analysis of 19,653 patients. 21-Mar-2025;16:100
How to cite this URL: Nolan J. Brown1, Saarang Patel2, Taylor Kenton Reardon3, James L. Rogers4, Julian Lassiter Gendreau5. Operative considerations for resection of pituitary adenoma in patients with sickle cell disease: A retrospective analysis of 19,653 patients. 21-Mar-2025;16:100. Available from: https://surgicalneurologyint.com/?post_type=surgicalint_articles&p=13446
Abstract
BackgroundSickle cell disease (SCD) is a hemoglobinopathy that affects over 30 million individuals worldwide. When significant “sickling” occurs, blood flow to specific organs can be impaired, resulting in ischemia or infarction. This can be problematic during intracranial surgery, in which low systemic circulatory volume due to significant blood loss can lead to intracranial hypotension. Using a multivariable modeling approach, we gathered a large patient dataset through a nationally representative database to inform future neurosurgical management of patients with concurrent SCD and pituitary adenoma.
MethodsWe queried the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project Nationwide Readmissions Database and implemented discharge weighting to identify a cohort of SCD patients who had undergone surgical resection of pituitary adenoma between 2015 and 2016. Variables investigated included patient age, sex, length of stay, postoperative complications and outcomes, payment methods, and median income, among several others.
ResultsRetrospective analysis identified 19,612 non-sickle cell patients (NSCP) and 41 SCD patients. Complication profiles for the SCD cohort demonstrated significantly higher rates of postoperative pulmonary embolism (P = 0.042) and pneumonia (P = 0.005) compared to those of the NSCP cohort. In addition, the SCD cohort trended toward higher rates of readmission (15.25% vs. 9.76%) and deep vein thrombosis, although neither achieved statistical significance (P = 0.45 and 0.07, respectively).
ConclusionSCD is a severe disorder that affects many individuals worldwide and represents a significant risk factor for complications and adverse outcomes in pituitary adenoma surgery. Further research is needed to explore SCD as a risk factor in pituitary surgery and the role it may play in perioperative complications.
Keywords: Apoplexy, Empty sella, Neurosurgery, Pituitary adenoma, Sickle cell disease, Skull base surgery
INTRODUCTION
Sickle cell disease (SCD) is a hemoglobinopathy affecting over 30 million individuals worldwide.[
Because surgical procedures appear to increase the risk of pathophysiological complications resulting from SCD, it is important to consider the management of SCD in complex intracranial procedures (such as resection of pituitary adenoma).
At present, a paucity of literature exists informing this topic; as such, there are no guidelines for the minimization of risks in pituitary adenoma patients undergoing transnasal resection of their pituitary lesion. Therefore, in the present study, we explore SCD as a potential perioperative risk factor for complications in the context of surgical management of pituitary adenomas. Using a multivariable modeling approach, we analyze a large patient dataset abstracted from a nationally representative database to inform future neurosurgical management of patients with concurrent SCD and pituitary adenoma.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Data source
The authors searched the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project Nationwide Readmissions Database (NRD) to identify a cohort of patients who had undergone surgical resection of pituitary adenoma through endoscopic or microscopic intervention surgery between 2015 and 2016. This dataset featured patients both with and without SCD (any patients with sickle cell trait would have been included in the NSC cohort by default). In addition, to assess various comorbid patient conditions, the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, and Clinical Modification codes were utilized.
The NRD serves as a nationally representative database ranging from approximately 17 million hospital discharges. It covers data from 22 geographically dispersed states and includes both payers and the uninsured in its data collection. Patient information from rehabilitation and long-term acute hospitals is excluded from the data collection.
Patient sample
From the NRD dataset, discharge weighting was implemented to identify 19,612 non-sickle cell patients (NSCP) and 41 sickle-cell patients (SCP). Patient age, sex, length of stay, postoperative complications and outcomes, payment methods, and median income, among several others, were variables extracted from the NRD. Median income was assessed in quartiles, with quartile I being the top earners and quartile IV comprising those individuals with the lowest incomes. Specific postoperative complications that were compared and contrasted in each patient cohort included perioperative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak, pulmonary embolism, deep vein thrombosis (DVT), hyperosmolarity/hyponatremia, postoperative CSF leak, infection, pneumonia, post hemorrhagic anemia, and acute kidney failure. Hospital readmission was defined as the number of patients who were readmitted postoperatively for any reason within the duration specified.
Statistical analysis
All statistical analyses performed throughout the study were conducted using R Studio (Version 1.4 1106). For analyses, statistical significance was defined as P < 0.05. Student’s t-tests were performed to compare two mean values between cohorts. A binomial-fitted multivariable analysis was performed using the glm function in RStudio Version 1.3.1073 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria) to discover associations among variables and postoperative outcomes. Covariates within the model were grouped respectively as number of patients in each cohort, postoperative complications, and cause of readmission. Post hoc odds ratios, 95% confidence intervals, and P-values were calculated.
RESULTS
Patient characteristics
In the NSC cohort, the mean patient age at the time of surgery was 52.9 years (standard deviation [SD]: 16.9 years), as compared to 44.99 years (SD: 13.9 years) in the SCD cohort [
Complications for SCP versus NSCP
In the NSC cohort, the mean all-payer cost was $25,546.08 (SD: $25,366.75), with a mean length of stay (LOS) of 4.9 days (SD: 7.3 days) [
A similar trend was seen in rates of pneumonia, with the SCD cohort having statistically significantly higher rates than the NSC (2.44% vs. 0.45%; OR = 1.04 [95% CI = 1.01–1.07], P = 0.005). Overall, the rates of readmission in the NSC and SCD cohorts are roughly comparable: 15.3% and 9.76% (P = 0.45).
DISCUSSION
SCD increases the risk of perioperative complications in patients undergoing both elective and emergent surgery.[
Given the relative prevalence and potential for clinical overlap between pituitary adenoma and SCD, we investigated the influence of SCD on postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing surgical resection of pituitary adenomas. To the authors’ knowledge, no retrospective or prospective study has analyzed risks associated with SCD in pituitary adenoma surgery.
Hematological disorders (HDs)
HDs, which encompass conditions that affect primarily blood or blood-producing organs, are known to play a pathological role in various neurological emergencies and conditions.[
Pituitary apoplexy
Pituitary apoplexy, which can result from hemorrhage into the pituitary gland or occlusion of glandular blood flow, is an extremely dangerous complication noted in anemic patients undergoing pituitary surgery.[
Cerebrovascular conditions
This is important because SCD has been found to have a particularly large impact on cerebrovascular conditions.[
In addition, ischemic stroke is a potentially major neurological complication of SCD.[
Pulmonary embolism
Through multivariable analysis, the authors identified that, for patients with SCD who underwent pituitary adenoma resection, pulmonary embolism (P = 0.005) and pneumonia (P = 0.042) were each significant postoperative complication. While the mechanism by which SCD affects various complications is yet unknown, it is established that patients with SCD are in a hypercoagulable state at baseline. This hypercoagulability causes blood flow augmentation and turbulence that may promote endothelial cell damage, predisposing to thrombus formation.[
Pneumonia
Pneumonia, a potentially serious infection, was also identified in the present study as a significant postoperative complication for patients with SCD who had undergone resection of a pituitary adenoma. Infection contributes significantly to morbidity and mortality in SCD as the sickle cell gene leads to an increased risk of infection for these patients as a result of functional asplenia.[
Importantly, the present study was the first multivariable analysis to evaluate the impact of SCD in pituitary surgery. Although previous studies have described the impact of SCD on various neurological diseases, this body of literature is relatively limited. Therefore, by providing a multivariable analysis specific to SCD patients undergoing pituitary surgery, the authors underscore the importance of specialized care for SCD patients when conducting pituitary adenoma resection and add to the overall literature informing care of patients with SCD.
Limitations
We acknowledge several limitations to the present study. First, the fact that the database only includes data from patients readmitted to the hospital means that it is, by definition, not reflective of the general population of all patients with SCD undergoing pituitary surgery. This introduces the potential for Bergson’s bias to affect the results we obtained. Future studies should leverage data from several registries to mitigate bias and maximize generalizability. Furthermore, due to the limited granularity of the database, comorbid patient conditions were unable to be identified for each patient. As a result, these potentially relevant variables were unable to be accounted for. Along these lines, complications commonly associated with SCD, such as stroke, spontaneous hematoma, take-back surgery for postoperative hematoma, and vision loss/complications, were not identifiable outcomes. Further, given our study analyzed patients from 2014-2015, this serves as a potential limitation regarding data collection. Finally, a key limitation of the present study is the small sample size of the SCD cohort, particularly when compared to the NSC cohort.
CONCLUSION
SCD represents a severe disorder that affects over 30 million individuals worldwide. Previous literature has failed to describe SCD as a risk factor in the context of pituitary adenoma surgery. To optimize neurosurgical care and patient outcomes, additional research is needed to explore further these complications and the mechanisms by which they arise in patients with SCD undergoing resection of pituitary adenoma.
Ethical approval
The Institutional Review Board approval is not required as it is retrospective study.
Declaration of patient consent
Patient’s consent was not required as there are no patients in this study.
Financial support and sponsorship
Nil.
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
Use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for manuscript preparation
The authors confirm that there was no use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for assisting in the writing or editing of the manuscript and no images were manipulated using AI.
Disclaimer
The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of the Journal or its management. The information contained in this article should not be considered to be medical advice; patients should consult their own physicians for advice as to their specific medical needs.
References
1. Adjepong KO, Otegbeye F, Adjepong YA. Perioperative management of sickle cell disease. Mediterr J Hematol Infect Dis. 2018. 10: e2018032
2. Arboix A, Jiménez C, Massons J, Parra O, Besses C. Hematological disorders: A commonly unrecognized cause of acute stroke. Expert Rev Hematol. 2016. 9: 891-901
3. Asemota AO, Ishii M, Brem H, Gallia GL. Comparison of complications, trends, and costs in endoscopic vs microscopic pituitary surgery: Analysis from a US health claims database. Neurosurgery. 2017. 81: 458-72
4. Babatola BO, Salman YA, Abiola AM, Okezie KO, Oladele AS. Spontaneous epidural haematoma in sickle cell anaemia: Case report and literature review. J Surg Tech Case Rep. 2012. 4: 135-7
5. Baltierra D, Harper T, Jones MP, Nau KC. Hematologic disorders: Sickle cell disease. FP Essent. 2015. 433: 27-39
6. Barkhoudarian G, Kelly DF. Pituitary apoplexy. Neurosurg Clin. 2019. 30: 457-63
7. Bi WL, Dunn IF, Laws ER. Pituitary apoplexy. Endocrine. 2015. 48: 69-75
8. Booth C, Inusa B, Obaro SK. Infection in sickle cell disease: A review. Int J Infect Dis. 2010. 14: e2-12
9. Briet C, Salenave S, Bonneville JF, Laws ER, Chanson P. Pituitary apoplexy. Endocr Rev. 2015. 36: 622-45
10. Broadway-Duren JB, Klaassen H. Anemias. Crit Care Nurs Clin. 2013. 25: 411-26
11. Chen C, Hu Y, Lyu L, Yin S, Yu Y, Jiang S. Incidence, demographics, and survival of patients with primary pituitary tumors: A SEER database study in 2004-2016. Sci Rep. 2021. 11: 15155
12. Chen T, Mordehai E, Sodha N, Kolodziejczak M, Savio C, Maslow A. Anesthetic considerations for percutaneous and open right atrial thrombectomy in a hemoglobin SC patient. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2021. 35: 1161-6
13. Cruz ML, Farooq S, Testai FD. Neurological and neurosurgical emergencies in patients with hematological disorders. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2017. 17: 24
14. Dahdaleh NS, Lindley TE, Kirby PA, Oya H, Howard MA. A “neurosurgical crisis” of sickle cell disease. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2009. 4: 532-5
15. Glezer A, Bronstein MD. Pituitary apoplexy: Pathophysiology, diagnosis and management. Arch Endocrinol Metab. 2015. 59: 259-64
16. Hannan CJ, Almhanedi H, Al-Mahfoudh R, Bhojak M, Looby S, Javadpour M. Predicting post-operative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak following endoscopic transnasal pituitary and anterior skull base surgery: A multivariate analysis. Acta Neurochir. 2020. 162: 1309-15
17. Hirtz D, Kirkham FJ. Sickle cell disease and stroke. Pediatr Neurol. 2019. 95: 34-41
18. Kaiafa G, Savopoulos C, Kanellos I, Mylonas KS, Tsikalakis G, Tegos T. Anemia and stroke: Where do we stand?. Acta Neurol Scand. 2017. 135: 596-602
19. Koirala S, Shrestha B, Lohani S, Bishokarma S, Devkota U. Postoperative complications of transsphenoidal pituitary adenectomy: A single institution based experience. Kathmandu Univ Med J. 2019. 66: 123-5
20. Kuwata F, Kikuchi M, Ishikawa M, Tanji M, Sakamoto T, Yamashita M. Long-term olfactory function outcomes after pituitary surgery by endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal approach. Auris Nasus Larynx. 2020. 47: 227-32
21. Lai SW, Lin CL, Liao KF. Risk of pneumonia among patients with splenectomy: A retrospective population-based cohort study. Ann Saudi Med. 2017. 37: 351-6
22. Liu J, Penn DL, Katznelson E, Safain MG, Dunn IF, Laws ER. Demonstration of infectious transgression through the skull base occurring 9 years after pituitary adenoma resection. World Neurosurg. 2018. 119: 215-9
23. Lobatto DJ, de Vries F, Najafabadi AH, Pereira AM, Peul WC, Vliet Vlieland TP. Preoperative risk factors for postoperative complications in endoscopic pituitary surgery: A systematic review. Pituitary. 2018. 21: 84-97
24. Maddali MM, Rajakumar MC, Vishnu PP, Valliattu J. Management of sickle cell disease during CABG surgery--a case report. Middle East J Anaesthesiol. 2006. 18: 1139-45
25. Memel Z, Chesney K, Pangal DJ, Bonney PA, Carmichael JD, Zada G. Outcomes following transsphenoidal pituitary surgery in the elderly: A retrospective single-center review. Oper Neurosurg. 2019. 16: 302-9
26. Miller BA, Ioachimescu AG, Oyesiku NM. Contemporary indications for transsphenoidal pituitary surgery. World Neurosurg. 2014. 82: S147-51
27. Molitch ME. Diagnosis and treatment of pituitary adenomas: A review. JAMA. 2017. 317: 516-24
28. Navalkele P, Özgönenel B, McGrath E, Lephart P, Sarnaik S. Invasive pneumococcal disease in patients with sickle cell disease. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2017. 39: 341-4
29. Novelli EM, Gladwin MT. Crises in sickle cell disease. Chest. 2016. 149: 1082-93
30. Pinto VM, Balocco M, Quintino S, Forni GL. Sickle cell disease: A review for the internist. Intern Emerg Med. 2019. 14: 1051-64
31. Platt OS, Brambilla DJ, Rosse WF, Milner PF, Castro O, Steinberg MH. Mortality in sickle cell disease. Life expectancy and risk factors for early death. N Engl J Med. 1994. 330: 1639-44
32. Povolotskiy R, Cerasiello SY, Siddiqui SH, Baredes S, Eloy JA, Hsueh WD. Anemia and blood transfusion requirements in endoscopic sinus surgery: A propensity-matched analysis. Laryngoscope. 2020. 130: 1377-82
33. Rees DC, Williams TN, Gladwin MT. Sickle-cell disease. Lancet. 2010. 376: 2018-31
34. Resar LM, Oliva MM, Casella JF. Skull infarction and epidural hematomas in a patient with sickle cell anemia. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 1996. 18: 413-5
35. Riesgo P, Mariño P, Platero A, Tarazona FJ, Fajardo C, Llácer JL. Postoperative CSF leakages after transsphenoidal surgery for pituitary adenomas: Analysis of a series of 302 surgical procedures. Neurocirugía (Engl Ed). 2019. 30: 215-21
36. Shaker L, Ripper J, Murano T. 55-year-old woman with headache, vomiting, and visual disturbance. Clin Pract Cases Emerg Med. 2020. 4: 116-20
37. Stotesbury H, Kawadler JM, Hales PW, Saunders DE, Clark CA, Kirkham FJ. Vascular instability and neurological morbidity in sickle cell disease: An integrative framework. Front Neurol. 2019. 10: 871
38. Stuart MJ, Nagel RL. Sickle-cell disease. Lancet. 2004. 364: 1343-60
39. Tivnan P, Billett HH, Freeman LM, Haramati LB. Imaging for pulmonary embolism in sickle cell disease: A 17-year experience. J Nucl Med. 2018. 59: 1255-9