Abstract

Background:Osteoblastomas are rare lesions comprising 1% of all bone tumors. The occipital bone is one of the rarest affected bone, with only 11 cases reported during the last 40 years.

Case Description:Here, we describe the clinical presentation and the radiological features of a suboccipital osteoblastoma that was successfully resected in a 30-year-old man. A short video shows the microsurgical removal of the lesion. There was no recurrence during a 12-month follow-up.

Conclusions:Even if osteoblastomas are benign tumors, a complete removal has to be achieved to reduce the risk of recurrences. This makes necessary an appropriate monitoring of the patient.

Keywords: Occipital bone, osteoblastoma, park bench position, suboccipital approach

INTRODUCTION

Osteoblastomas are rare lesions comprising 1% of all bone tumors. Skull bones are affected in only approximately 3% of the cases, and the occipital bone is far less involved than facial, temporal, frontal, and skull base bones.[ 1 9 10 11 19 ] Here, we present the 12^th case of a patient with an occipital osteoblastoma reported in the literature during the last 40 years, with a detailed description of its main features as well as of our surgical strategy.[ 2 5 14 15 17 ]

CASE REPORT

A 30-year-old man, without significant medical history, was admitted to our department for a painful left occipitocervical swelling, progressively worsening over the past several months. A physical examination revealed an occipital hard mass covered by the normal skin, without any neurological deficit.

A computerized tomography (CT) scan showed an osteolytic lesion inside the diploic space surrounded by sclerotic tissue expanded to the left squamous portion of the occipital bone around the foramen magnum. In addition, the CT angiography with three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction revealed a close relation between the tumor and the vertebral and occipital arteries [ Figure 1 ]. Eventually, a craniocervical magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed the soft extracranial tissues partially affected by the tumor, without intracranial extension [ Figure 1 ].

Figure 1

Preoperative images. (a) Axial CT scan showing a left osteolytic occipital lesion surrounded by sclerotic tissue extended inferiorly up to the foramen magnum. (b and c) 3D reconstructions of the CT angiogram illustrating the close relationship between the tumor and the vertebral and occipital arteries. (d) Sagittal post-contrast T1-weighted MRI scan revealing an avidly enhancing occipital extra-axial mass

The patient underwent a left suboccipital approach in the park bench position. After the dissection of the soft tissues, the lesion was targeted according to anatomic landmarks. Under the operating microscope, the tumor was progressively removed, using high speed drills and rongeurs, up to the normal dura and surrounding normal bone. However, the left occipital condyle was left undisturbed [ Figure 2 ; Video 1 ] (Supplemental Digital Content, illustrating the microsurgical removal of the lesion).

Figure 2

Intraoperative photographs. (a) Initial removal of the lesion with a high speed drill. (b) Removal of the lesion using a kerrison rongeur, once the dura is reached, in order to prevent inadvertent dural lacerations. (c) Surgical field at the end of the resection with the surrounding normal bone

The postoperative course was uneventful, and the patient's symptoms disappeared. The histopathological examination was consistent with benign osteoblastoma, and the postoperative CT scan showed the complete resection of the lesion [ Figure 3 ]. There was no recurrence during a 12-month follow-up.

Figure 3

Post-operative images. (a) Axial CT scan showing the lesion was totally removed. (b and c) 3D CT scan reconstructions illustrating the reconstruction of the skull defect with a titanium mesh

DISCUSSION

Osteoblastomas comprise 1% of all bone tumors. Skull bones are affected in only 3% of the cases, and occipital osteoblastomas are even rarer. To the best of our knowledge, this is the 12^th case reported in the last 40 years.[ 2 5 14 15 ]

The presentation of the tumor is more frequent in men less than 30 years old; calvarian osteoblastomas essentially share the same characteristics of the osteoblastomas in other locations,[ 10 ] and they are treated for intractable pain, increase in size, and bone destruction.[ 20 ]

Occipital osteoblastomas present as circumscribed expansive intraosseous lesions between the inner and outer table of the occipital bone, with lytic and sclerotic appearance in plain radiographs and CT scans.[ 2 16 ] CT angiography may help to describe the vascular supply of the tumor, thus estimating the necessity of a presurgical embolization. The MRI is too variable to define the diagnosis of osteoblastoma, although it is very useful to determine the involvement of the adjacent soft tissues, as in our case.[ 14 16 ]

Even though giant osteoid osteomas are reported, unlike osteoblastomas,[ 4 ] they frequently have less than 15 mm in their maximal diameter, and the severe pain produced by them during the night is usually relieved by acetylsalicylic acid.[ 12 20 ] On the other hand, osteosarcomas, dermoid cysts, intradiploic meningiomas, as well as eosinophilic granulomas may also mimic osteoblastomas.[ 17 19 ] Only the histopathological examination, which is characterized by irregular bony trabeculae surrounded by osteoblasts and osteoid tissue, will define the diagnosis.[ 5 14 ]

The recurrence of osteoblastomas after surgery is approximately 9.8–15%.[ 20 ] They may show sarcomatous changes, local extension into the extraskeletal soft tissues, and may even metastasize.[ 13 17 ] Their clinical outcome is basically related with the completeness of the resection and with their location. Apparently, osteoblastomas confined to short and flat bones have a more aggressive behavior, which leads us to conclude that the resection of osteoblastomas must be as large as possible. Hence, in the case of a tumor located in the occipitocervical junction, a stabilization may be required, as well as the transposition of the vertebral artery.[ 3 7 ] However, occipitocervical stability is not compromised if less than one-half of the C0–C1 joint is removed.[ 6 8 18 ] Some osteoblastomas may be hypervascularized, thus requiring a preoperative embolization by using particles or some another kind of endovascular agents.[ 2 ] Because of the risk of recurrence, a careful follow-up of the patient is essential.[ 7 ]

In summary, occipital osteoblastomas are extreme rare benign bone tumors with typical histological features, sometimes hypervascularized, and with a high tendency to recur when they are not completely resected. At times, their treatment may require presurgical embolization, occipitocervical fusion, and/or transposition of the vertebral artery. Their high risk of recurrence makes necessary an appropriate monitoring of the patient.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

Video Available on: www.surgicalneurologyint.com

References

1. Akhaddar A, Gazzaz M, Rimani M, Mostarchid B, Labraimi A, Boucetta M. Benign fronto-orbital osteoblastoma arising from the orbital roof: Case report and literature review.Surg. Neurol. 2004. 61: 391-7

2. Alli A, Johnson P, Reeves A. Imaging characteristics of occipital bone osteoblastoma. Case Rep Radiol 2013. 2013. p. 930623-

3. Bruneau M, Polivka M, Cornelius JF, George B. Progression of an osteoid osteoma to an osteoblastoma. Case report. J Neurosurg Spine. 2005. 3: 238-41

4. Erten F, Hasturk AE, Pak I, Sokmen O. Giant occipital osteoid osteoma mimicking calcified meningioma. Neurosciences. 2011. 16: 363-5

5. Han X, Dong Y, Sun K, Lu Y. A huge occipital osteoblastoma accompanied with aneurysmal bone cyst in the posterior cranial fossa. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2008. 110: 282-5

6. Hernesniemi J, Niemelä M, Karatas A, Kivipelto L, Ishii K, Rinne J. Some collected principles of microneurosurgery: Simple and fast, while preserving normal anatomy: A review. Surg Neurol. 2005. 64: 195-200

7. Jackson RP. Recurrent osteoblastoma: A review. Clin Orthop. 1978. 131: 229-33

8. Lot G, George B. The extent of drilling in lateral approaches to the cranio-cervical junction area from a series of 125 cases. Acta Neurochir. 1999. 141: 111-8

9. Low Y, Foo CL, Seow WT. Childhood temporal bone osteoblastoma: A case report. J. Pediatr Surg. 2000. 35: 1127-9

10. Lucas DR, Unni KK, McLeod RA, O’Connor MI, Sim FH. Osteoblastoma: Clinicopathologic study of 306 cases. Hum Pathol. 1994. 25: 117-34

11. McDonald PJ, Matouk CC, Papsin B, Rutka JT. Clival osteoblastoma in a child. Case illustration. J Neurosurg. 2003. 98: 1133-

12. McLeod RA, Dahlin DC, Beabout JW. The spectrum of osteoblastoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1976. 126: 321-5

13. Mitchell ML, Ackerman LV. Metastatic and pseudomalignant osteoblastoma: A report of two unusual cases. Skeletal Radiol. 1986. 15: 213-8

14. Moon KS, Jung S, Lee JH, Jung TY, Kim I, Kim SH. Benign osteoblastoma of the occipital bone: Case report and literature review. Neuropathology. 2006. 26: 141-6

15. Muzumdar D, Balasubramaniam S, Jhawar S, Goel A. Massive benign osteoblastoma of the suboccipital bone and foramen magnum region. Pediatr Neurosurg. 2010. 46: 232-7

16. Narita T, Ishii N, Mayuzumi H, Kobayashi H, Ikeda J, Iwasaki Y. Occipitoparietal benign osteoblastoma: Should entire lesion be resected when magnetic resonance images reveal wide abnormal signal intensity in surrounding bone marrow?. Surg Neurol. 2005. 64: 180-3

17. Tawil A, Comair Y, Nasser H, Hourani R, Rebeiz J, Chamoun R. Periosteal osteoblastoma of the calvaria mimicking a meningioma. Pathol Res Pract. 2008. 204: 413-22

18. Velasquez JC, Lau J, Kozyrev D, Sharafeddin F, Colasanti R, Luostarinen T. Clean, fast and preserving normal anatomy: “The Helsinki revolution” in microneurosurgery. J Neurosurg Sci. 2016. 60: 44-53

19. Wang YC, Huang JS, Wu CJ, Jeng CM, Fan JK, Resnick D. A huge osteoblastoma with aneurysmal bone cyst in skull base. Clin Imaging. 2001. 25: 247-50

20. Zileli M, Cagli S, Basdemir G, Ersahin Y. Osteoid osteomas and osteoblastomas of the spine. Neurosurg Focus. 2003. 15: E5-