- Editor-in-Chief, Rancho Mirage, CA, USA
James I. Ausman
Editor-in-Chief, Rancho Mirage, CA, USA
DOI:10.4103/2152-7806.145933Copyright: © 2014 Ausman JI. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
How to cite this article: Ausman JI. The Death of Spine Surgery, Sequel - 2014. Surg Neurol Int 29-Nov-2014;5:169
How to cite this URL: Ausman JI. The Death of Spine Surgery, Sequel - 2014. Surg Neurol Int 29-Nov-2014;5:169. Available from: http://sni.wpengine.com/surgicalint_articles/the-death-of-spine-surgery-sequel-2014/
Clark Watts has published an outstanding paper on the shift of the American Association of Neurological Surgeons (AANS) from an educational association to a trade association in 2003.[
In this paper he describes what influence this change may have had on the practice of neurosurgery and the neurosurgeon–patient relationship. He cites data that spine surgery represents 70-100% of what a neurosurgeon does now. He quotes evidence that the fusions being done for spinal stenosis have increased 15× from 2002 to 2007 without an increase in disease complexity. In addition, the costs for the procedures tripled and the complications also increased. He cites that Consumer Reports rates spine surgery as the most over-used treatment in Medicine. He also reports that the reimbursement for a simple decompressive laminectomy has decreased by 33% and for complex procedures with fusions by 20%.[
Nancy Epstein and others have reported in Surgical Neurology International (SNI) that 50% of spine surgery being done is unnecessary.[
There were reports of neurosurgeons receiving high compensation as consultants to industry producing spine technology[
I have seen these changes in spine surgery occurring all over the world as the desire for more compensation incentivizes neurosurgeons and spine surgeons to do more complex procedures for greater financial reward. It is not a phenomenon restricted to the USA.
In 2003, I wrote an Editorial on “The Death of Spine Surgery”,[
With the coming economic problems of the economies worldwide because of the huge expansion in worldwide debt backed by the printing of money that is not backed by gold and thus has no value, governments will be forced to make decisions to restrict expenses. The ultimate effect on neurosurgeons, spine surgeons, pain management specialists, and hospitals will be a drastic reduction in reimbursement for spine surgery. These events will have a huge impact on spine specialists incomes. Epstein has suggested how economies can be made in widely used procedures.[
What I have advised for years is that Multidisciplinary Spine Centers be developed that would include Psychologists, Occupational therapists, Physical Therapists, Drug Addiction Specialists, Chiropractors, and Neurosurgeons or Spine surgeons who together would diagnose and treat neck and back pain. Thus, regardless of what happens economically in your country, the patient would always be under the control of the “Back and Neck Pain Center”. With the multidisciplinary evaluation of each patient, the proper treatment could be administered and justified. Private practicing internists and general practitioners are flooded with patients from Orthopedists and Neurosurgeons who do not want to see those with continued postoperative pain or drug addiction. There should be plenty of patients for those whose Back and Neck Pain Center did a reasonable job in evaluating patients and restoring those to work. Industry is interested in this kind of assessment but cannot find places where this type of work is done.
The alternative is to keep doing what you are doing and deny reality with the eventual crash of your income and specialty.
Clark Watts has eloquently stated for National Associations what they must do given this impending crisis.
You decide, or someone else will.
1. Ausman JI. The death of spine surgery as we know it. Surg Neurol. 2003. 60: 469-
2. Burton TM. Medtronic Voluntarily Discloses Doctor Pay. WSJ. 2010. p.
3. Epstein NE. Iliac crest autograft versus alternative constructs for anterior cervical spine surgery: Pros, cons, and costs. Surg Neurol Int. 2012. 3: S143-56
4. Epstein NE. The risks of epidural and transforaminal steroid injections in the Spine: Commentary and a comprehensive review of the literature. Surg Neurol Int. 2013. 4: S74-93
5. Epstein NE. Are recommended spine operations either unnecessary or too complex? Evidence from second opinions. Surg Neurol Int. 2013. 4: S353-8
6. Epstein NE, Gottesman M. Few patients with neurodegenerative disorders require spinal surgery. Surg Neurol Int. 2014. 5: S81-7
7. Friedly JL, Comstock BA, Turner JA, Heagerty PJ, Deyo RA, Sullivan SD. A randomized trial of epidural glucocorticoid injections 7. for spinal stenosis. N Engl J Med. 2014. 371: 11-21
8. Gamache FW. The value of “another” opinion for spinal surgery: A prospective 14-month study of one surgeon's experience. Surg Neurol Int. 2012. 3: S350-4
9. . Surgeon salesmen? Doctors profit from devices they put in patients. CBS News. 2013. p.
10. Watts C. Neurosurgery: A profession or a technical trade?. Surg Neurol Int. 2014. p.