Tools

Allan J Drapkin
  1. Department of Neurosurgery, Rutgers Medical and Health Sciences University, Newark, United States

Correspondence Address:
Allan J Drapkin, Department of Neurosurgery, Rutgers Medical and Health Sciences University, Newark, United States.

DOI:10.25259/SNI_213_2025

Copyright: © 2025 Surgical Neurology International This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, transform, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

How to cite this article: Allan J Drapkin. The parietal transcortical approach to the lateral ventricle: Opening Pandora’s box. 02-May-2025;16:169

How to cite this URL: Allan J Drapkin. The parietal transcortical approach to the lateral ventricle: Opening Pandora’s box. 02-May-2025;16:169. Available from: https://surgicalneurologyint.com/?post_type=surgicalint_articles&p=13526

Date of Submission
28-Feb-2025

Date of Acceptance
03-Apr-2025

Date of Web Publication
02-May-2025

Abstract

Background: Intraventricular tumors present a difficult decision regarding the selection of the optimal surgical approach for their resection. Among various possibilities, the parietal transcortical approach (PTA) is currently used in this endeavor.

Methods: A comprehensive literature review was conducted on the surgical approaches used for the resection of intraventricular tumors, focusing on the PTA.

Results: This approach presents multiple potential sequelae, some of them clinically recognized, sequelae that have varying clinical significance.

Conclusion: The PTA should be replaced by other safer ones.

Keywords: Intraventricular tumors, Neurological sequelae, Optic radiation, Parietal transcortical approach, Surgical approaches

INTRODUCTION

In Greek mythology, Pandora’s box was actually a large sealed storage jar that contained multiple curses, curses that would be released upon its opening causing great and unexpected troubles to mankind. Tumors located within the lateral ventricular trigone are infrequently encountered in clinical practice[ 3 ], and a number of different surgical approaches have been tried for their resection [ 6 , 8 , 9 ], depending on their size and location within the ventricle. Nevertheless, the selection of a safe approach, causing no new neurological deficits, still poses a significant challenge.[ 5 ]

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A comprehensive literature review was conducted on the surgical approaches used for the resection of intraventricular tumors, focusing on the parietal transcortical approach.

RESULTS

This approach presents multiple potential sequelae, some of them clinically recognized, sequelae that have varying clinical significance.

DISCUSSION

A surgical approach currently used for the resection of intraventricular tumors is the parietal transcortical approach (PTA). In it, by necessity, a cortical incision along the superior parietal lobe is done, which has minimal clinical consequences. That notwithstanding, the necessary surgical tract, extending from that parietal site into the lateral ventricle, results in significant white matter disruption.[ 19 ] Being the cerebral white matter, the framework through which multiple neural pathways run in all directions interconnecting diverse cerebral regions, its disruption may cause injury to any of these connecting fiber systems, resulting in a number of unwanted neurological deficits of variable clinical import. The purpose here is to highlight some of these unwanted neurological deficits potentially incurred by PTA, which may include any of the following:

Homonymous hemianopia (HH)

It is the most frequent complication of PTA, resulting from optic radiation trauma at the roof of the trigone, which is the point of entry into the ventricle by this approach. This is an area covered by optic radiation fibers,[ 7 , 10 ] and therefore, interrupting the visual circuit connecting the lateral geniculate nucleus with the striate cortex may cause a variety of visual field defects, the most frequent among these being HH, a visual defect which is frequently permanent with only occasional recovery.[ 21 ]

Optic ataxia

A high-order integrative sensorimotor deficit causes incoordination of visually goal-directed reaching and grasping of objects when observed under peripheral vision.[ 1 ] It is caused by the disruption of the dorsal visual stream,[ 15 ] a white matter pathway that transfers visual information from the striate cortex to the parietal lobe for its further processing. This stream is vulnerable in PTA.

Amusia

It is a neural deficit that denotes the partial or total loss of a preexistent ability to process music in any of its diverse aspects, a loss that can be transient or permanent. Since, thus far, there has been no defined circumscribed cerebral location solely entrusted with any specific musical function (if it exists at all), it has become evident that, in normal conditions, music functions require the participation of various interconnected cerebral regions (frontal, temporal and/or parietal), interconnections that are achieved through white matter pathways.[ 11 ] These connections, when disrupted (as is the case in PTA), can result in Amusia, a defect that probably affects a significant segment of the general population but becomes clinically evident only in the case of professional musicians or music enthusiasts.

Visual allesthesia

An exceptional visual phenomenon, transient or persistent, where the image produced by a visual stimulus is transposed from one homonymous visual field to the opposite one, resulting in the duplication of the image.[ 12 ] It appears to be the result of damage to an occipitotemporal white matter pathway [ 2 ], i.e., the ventral visual stream, a pathway that is also liable to injury in PTA.

Loss of a preexistent normal level of libido

A symptom rarely investigated in preoperative or postoperative evaluations of patients submitted to cranial or spinal surgical surgery[ 4 , 15 ], probably because it may be felt as an odd or uncomfortable type of inquiry. It is a sequela that causes a significant impact on the patient’s well-being and sexuality. It is caused, in the case of PTA, by the unavoidable manipulation of the subependymal arteries (during the process of detaching the ependymal layer from the tumor capsule), a manipulation that may cause vasospasm or occlusion of some of these vessels. These, being centrifugal end arteries that branch off from the lateral or medial choroidal arteries,[ 13 , 14 , 16 ] may result in ischemia in the territory they supply, which includes the limbic system, a neural circuitry fundamental for the maintenance of a normal level of sexuality.

Hemiparesis

Hemiparesis, which in this case is usually transient. It is also due to spasm or occlusion of one or more of the sub-ependymal arteries, incurred by manipulation of the ependymal lining or by coagulation of the choroid plexus[ 13 , 14 , 16 ] resulting in infarction in the lateral posterior choroidal artery’s territory,[ 17 , 20 ] with ischemia of the corticospinal tract.

Cognitive deficits such as acalculia, apraxia, and or a complete Gerstmann’s syndrome

These are deficits that may result from vascular pathology or brain tumors affecting the parietal angular or superior parietal lobes when in the dominant hemisphere. In PTA, the unavoidable parietal white matter disruption, when PTA is done in the dominant hemisphere, can cause this condition. With the exception of homonymous hemianopia, hemiparesis, and cognitive deficits, which are clinically evident, these other sequelae might pass clinically unnoticed because their clinical expression is not obviously disabling and are not usually investigated in pre or postoperative evaluations.

CONCLUSION

The potential sequelae herewith described should foster a change in the surgical approach to these lesions to alternative approaches, a suggestion that has been previously raised.[ 18 , 19 ] Among these, the interhemispheric transcallosal approach,[ 9 ] by entering the ventricle through its medial wall, has the advantage of avoiding damage to the optic radiations. Nevertheless despite this potential advantage, this approach still can result in other potential neural deficits. The keyhole supracerebellar transtentorial approach[ 8 ] offers the advantage of avoiding white matter disruption. The neuroportal transcortical approach,[ 6 ] by the use of tubular systems with endoscopic assistance, offers minimal brain retraction with good visualization and consequently less white matter disruption. Although each one of these approaches is theoretically safer than PTA, more experience with them is required to allow for a solid evaluation of their real value.

Ethical approval

The research/study complied with the Helsinki Declaration of 1964.

Declaration of patient consent

Patient’s consent is not required as there are no patients in this study.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of Interest.

Use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for manuscript preparation

The author(s) confirms that there was no use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for assisting in the writing or editing of the manuscript and no images were manipulated using the AI.

Disclaimer

The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of the Journal or its management. The information contained in this article should not be considered to be medical advice; patients should consult their own physicians for advice as to their specific medical needs.

Acknowledgments

The author wishes to thank Ms. Elizabeth Merced Gonzales, Dr. Paola Vermeer, and Mr. Gabriel Zepeda Saavedra for their bibliographical support and Mr. Samuel Abogabir for his technical assistance in the performance of this work.

References

1. Andersen RA, Andersen KN, Hwang EJ, Hauschild M. Optic ataxia: From Balint’s syndrome to the parietal reach region. Neuron. 2014. 81: 967-83

2. Arai T, Irie K, Akiyama M, Kamikubo T, Nakajima M, Sakai H. A case of falcotentorial meningioma with visual allesthesia. No To Shinkei. 2002. 54: 255-9

3. Calabro RS, Cacciola A, Bruschetta D, Milardi D, Quattrini F, Sciarrone F. Neuroanatomy and function of human sexual behavior: A neglected or unknown issue?. Brain Behav. 2019. 9: e01389

4. , editors. CBTUS Statistical report: Primary brain tumors in the United States. Hindsdale IL: Oxford University Press; 2002. p.

5. Drapkin AJ. Intraventricular meningiomas and their troubling surgical approach: A case report. J Neurol Stroke. 2023. 13: 109-11

6. Gagliardi F, Piloni M, Bailo M, Gragnaniello C, Boari N, Donofrio CA. Anatomic study on neuroendoportal transcortical approach to lateral ventricles. World Neurosurg. 2019. 131: e255-64

7. Mahaney KB, Abdulrauf SI. Anatomic relationship of the optic radiations to the atrium of the lateral ventricle: Description of a novel entry point to the trigone. Neurosurgery. 2008. 63: 195-202 discussion 202-3

8. Marcus HJ, Sarkar H, Mindermann T, Reisch R. Keyhole supracerebellar transtentorial transcollateral sulcus approach to the lateral ventricle. Neurosurgery. 2013. 73: onsE295-301

9. Muftah Lahirish IA, Middlebrooks EH, Holanda VM, Batista-Quintero R, Maeda FL, Neto MR. Comparison between transcortical and interhemispheric approaches to the atrium of lateral ventricle using combined white matter fiber dissections and magnetic resonance tractography. World Neurosurgery. 2020. 138: e478-85

10. Peltier J, Traqvers N, Destrieuk C, Velut S. Optic radiations: A microsurgical anatomical study. J Neurosurg. 2006. 105: 294-300

11. Peretz I, Champoed AS, Hyde R. Varieties of musical disorders. The montreal battery for evaluation of Amusia. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2003. 999: 58-75

12. Piccirilli M, Sciarma T, Luzzi S. Modularity of music: Evidence from a case of pure amusia. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2000. 69: 541-5

13. Reptsis A, Demitzoglou I, Nikopoulos A, Almaliotis D, Cheva A, Karampatakis V. Visual allesthesia in a patient with glioblastoma multiforme. J Ophthalmol. 2012. 2: 97-102

14. Saito R, Kumabe T, Sonoda Y, Kanamori M, Mugikura S, Takahashi S. Infarction of the lateral posterior choroidal artery territory after manipulation of the choroid plexus at the atrium: Causal association with subependymal artery injury. J Neurosurg. 2013. 119: 158-63

15. Surbeck W, Herbet G, Duffau H. Sexuality after surgery for diffuse low-grade glioma. Neurol Oncol. 2015. 17: 574-9

16. Ungerlieder LG, Mishkin M, Inge DJ, Goodale MA, Mansfield RJ, editors. Two cortical visual visual systems. Analysis of visual behaviour. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1982. p. 549-86

17. Van Den Bergh R. The ventriculofugal arteries. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1992. 13: 413-5

18. Xu Y, Molhiedin A, Doniz-Gonzalez A, Vigo V, Pastor-Escartin F, Meng L. Microsurgical anatomy of the lateral posterior choroidal artery: Implications for intraventricular surgery involving the choroid plexus. J Neurosurg. 2021. 135: 1534-49

19. Yasargil MG, editors. Microneurosurgery of CNS tumors. Stutgart: Georg Thieme; 1996. p.

20. Yasargil MG, Ture U, Yasargil DC. Surgical anatomy of supratentorial midline lesions. Neurosurg Focus. 2005. 18: E1

21. Yoshida M, Ida M, Nguyen TH, Bellinger L, Stievenart JL, Nagao T. Resolution of homonymous visual field loss documented with functional magnetic resonance and diffusion tensor imaging. J Neuroophthalmol. 2006. 26: 11-7

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *