- Professor of Neurosurgery, Sina Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
- Assistant Professor of Anaesthesiology, Sina Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Assistant Professor of Anaesthesiology, Sina Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
DOI:10.4103/2152-7806.137725Copyright: © 2014 Amirjamshidi A This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
How to cite this article: Amirjamshidi A, Etezadi F. Trigeminocardiac reflex: Some thought to the definition, response. Surg Neurol Int 29-Jul-2014;5:115
How to cite this URL: Amirjamshidi A, Etezadi F. Trigeminocardiac reflex: Some thought to the definition, response. Surg Neurol Int 29-Jul-2014;5:115. Available from: http://sni.wpengine.com/surgicalint_articles/trigeminocardiac-reflex-some-thought-to-the-definition-response/
It is an honor that Professor Scaller and his group of researchers were interested in our research and have criticized it so deeply (Sadr-Eshkevari et al., SNI, 2014;5:43). Appreciating their interest in this research and in the topic of TCR in surgical practices of all branches, we would like to present this short discussion of the issues raised by them as a response letter to be published in SNI, in accordance with the Editor-in-Chief's idea.
First, according to the study of Schaller et al., the TCR has four components (bradycardia, hypotension, apnea, and gastric hypermotility).[
All patients in our study had undergone general anesthesia using mechanical ventilation. So, it was impossible to check them for occurrence of apnea during the operation. Moreover, the occurrence of “gastric hypermotility” was first described by Kratschmer et al. in 1870 during nasal mucosa stimulation of cats and rabbits and this sign has never been proved to exist in a human study.[
Regarding the second and third parts of the letter, if one checks the distribution of our 190 cases in terms of the type of surgical procedures, it will be found that we have included patients with both central and peripheral types of TCR in this study. It is well-taken that the ethical limitations make it too difficult to conduct human studies in this field.
Fourth, the main drawback of both studies of Bohluli et al. was that the deepness of anesthesia has not been controlled with a device like “BIS monitor” during anesthesia. Meanwhile, we tried to avoid repeating this main shortcoming in designing the plan of anesthesia. It is well-known that the level of aggression of surgical maneuver along with the level of pain perceived by the patient has a great impact on the magnitude of any autonomic reflex (vaso-vagal, trigemino-cardiac, etc.). Furthermore, Bohluli et al. found that blocking a nerve through its course could decrease the incidence of TCR while imposing noxious stimuli in the territory of the same nerve. This finding supports the general concept which we have tried to convey through the study. In other words, it is inevitable to see a high rate of TCR while the anesthesia is light.[
Additionally, we designed our study to answer a main clinical concern during neurosurgical procedures. Thus, we defined a clinically meaningful cut-off point (20% changes) which has been used by many authors before. It is declared that our study was an applied one and not a basic science research study.
Fifth, as discussed in our communication, we have kept a controlled level of general anesthesia to reduce the impact of other confounding factors that might be the cause of bradycardia. It should be emphasized that searching for a definite cause–effect relationship is best investigated through an animal study, not in human subject.
The only thing all researchers agree upon is that the “TCR” certainly does exist. It is one of the most ancient brain reflexes with its center located deeply in the brain structure. Although we cannot totally abort it, as a clinician, we can reduce the frequency of its occurrence.
Sixth, according to the study of Paton et al., co-activation of both components of autonomic nervous system is observed in the peripheral chemoreceptors, diving, oculocardiac, and somatic nociceptor reflex responses. In addition, all the afore-mentioned reflexes may have a protective role in difficult natural situation in mammals by enhancing the cardiac output.[
We cannot predict the behavior of hemodynamic system when encountering TCR. Thus, it is suggested that occurrence of such reflexes can best be strictly prevented by preparing sufficient deepness of anesthesia rather than comparing the level of painful stimulus with the level of hemodynamic changes during surgical procedures. Consequently, we would like to disagree with Professor Schaller's suggestion to design a study in such a way in the future.
1. Last accessed on 2014 Jan 15. ISBN: 978-953-51- 0623-4, In Tech.
2. Bohluli B, Schaller BJ, Khorshidi-Khiavi R, Dalband M, Sadr-Eshkevari P, Maurer P. Trigeminocardiac reflex, bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy, Gow-Gates block: A randomized controlled clinical trial. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011. 69: 2316-20
3. Paton JF, Boscan P, Pickering AE, Nalivaiko E. The yin and yang of cardiac autonomic control: Vago-sympathetic interactions revisited. Brain Res Brain Res Rev. 2005. 49: 555-65
4. Schaller BJ, Filis A, Buchfelder M. Trigemino-cardiac reflex in humans initiated by peripheral stimulation during neurosurgical skull-base operations. Its first description. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2008. 150: 715-8
5. Schaller B, Probst R, Strebel S, Gratzl O. Trigeminocardiac reflex during surgery in the cerebellopontine angle. J Neurosurg. 1999. 90: 215-20