Abstract

Background: Scientific literature, with no conflicts of interest, shows that even below the limits defined by the International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection, microwaves from telecommunication technologies cause numerous health effects: neurological, oxidative stress, carcinogenicity, deoxyribonucleic acid and immune system damage, electro-hypersensitivity. The majority of these biological effects of non-thermal microwave radiation have been known since the 1970s.

Methods: Detailed scientific, political, and military documents were analyzed. Most of the scientific literature comes from PubMed. The other articles (except for a few) come from impacted journals . The rare scientific documents that were not peer reviewed were produced by recognized scientists in their fields. The rest of the documentation comes from official sources: political (e.g., European Union and World Health Organization), military (e.g., US Air Force and NATO), patents, and national newspapers.

Results: (1) Since their emergence, the authorities have deployed and encouraged the use of wireless technologies (2G, 3G, 4G, WiFi, WiMAX, DECT, Bluetooth, cell phone towers/masts/base stations, small cells, etc.) in full awareness of their harmful effects on health. (2) Consequences of microwave radiation from communication networks are comparable to the effects of low-power directed-energy microwave weapons, whose objectives include behavioral modification through neurological (brain) targeting. Above 20 gigahertz, 5G behaves like an unconventional chemical weapon. (3) Biomedical engineering (via graphene-based nanomaterials) will enable brain-computer connections, linked wirelessly to the Internet of Everything through 5G and 6G networks (2030) and artificial intelligence, gradually leading to human-machine fusion (cyborg) before the 2050s.

Conclusion: Despite reports and statements from the authorities presenting the constant deployment of new wireless communication technologies, as well as medical research into nanomaterials, as society’s ideal future, in-depth research into these scientific fields shows, above all, an objective linked to the current cognitive war. It could be hypothesized that, in the future, this aim will correspond to the control of humanity by machines.

Keywords: Cognitive warfare, COVID-19 vaccines, Directed energy weapons, Electro-hypersensitivity, Internet of Everything, Neurodegenerative diseases

INTRODUCTION

Unlike natural cosmic microwaves, microwaves from wireless communication technologies are polarized (electronic oscillations take place in specific directions/orientations), which can lead to irregular triggering of electrosensitive ion channels on cell membranes and cause numerous biological effects, up to and including deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) damage, cell death, or cancer;[ 113 , 114 ] modulated (used to encode information) and pulsed, at very low frequencies (close to brain waves).[ 106 , 115 ]

By the 1970s, the biological effects of microwaves (neurologic, endocrine gland activity, cardiovascular, hemodynamic, metabolic, gastric, ocular, testicles, bone marrow, hypertension, abortion, and behavioral), with exposures below intensities that cause heating, were already known,[ 14 , 27 , 106 ] especially from the military, National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) and World Health Organization (WHO).[ 1 , 79 , 117 ] The guidelines and standards selected by the WHO, through the International Commission on Non-ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP), have therefore been deliberately chosen with full knowledge of the facts since the beginning of wireless technology deployment.

The standards defined by the ICNIRP serve as the basis for most recommendations and regulations in countries around the world. In 2020, ICNIRP guidelines, for all frequencies between 2 and 300 gigahertz (GHz), allow a 30-min average whole-body exposure of 10, 000, 000 µW/m² (10 W/m² or 1000 µW/cm²).[ 106 ] With regard to 5G technology, which uses frequencies above 6 GHz, and whose specificity is to send directional beams localized on the user [ Figure 1 ], the ICNIRP authorizes a local exposure of 200,000,000 µW/m² (200 W/m²) for 6 min over an area of 4 cm², and 400,000,000 µW/m² over an area of 1 cm², for frequencies >30 GHz.[ 106 ] However, according to experts with no conflicts of interest, the maximum intensity should not exceed 10 µW/m².[ 106 ]

Figure 1:

In contrast to previous generations of networks, 5G uses beam steering, allowing base station antennas to direct the radio signal toward users and devices rather than in all directions (Source: “The Electromagnetic Fields (EMF) Explained Series - https://www.emfexplained.info”).

By comparison, for the whole frequency spectrum from 2G to 5G, the ICNIRP exposure limit recommendation for man-made electromagnetic radiation is ~10²¹–10²³-fold higher than the average radiation background of the Sun’s nonionizing radiation at Earth’s surface in the 2G–5G spectral range (~10⁻²³–10⁻²¹ mW/cm²).[ 55 ]

The massive rollout of 5G and 5G in the millimeter-wave (mmWave) frequency band (30–300 GHz) is scandalizing many scientists with no conflicts of interest. Indeed, since the start of wireless communication technologies using microwave frequency bands (0.3–300 GHz), the authorities in charge of health assessments have constantly covered up the truth about the dangerousness of these devices (2G, 3G, 4G, WiFi, WiMAX, DECT, Bluetooth, cell phone towers/masts/base stations, small cells, etc.).[ 52 , 70 , 106 , 107 ]

Below ICNIRP limits (non-thermal effects), microwave studies have shown brain tumors, neurological effects, increased oxidative stress, cancers, mutagenic effects due to DNA damage, neuropsychiatric disorders (behavioral changes), electro-hypersensitivity (EHS), increased blood-brain barrier (BBB) permeability, inflammatory factors, increased male and female infertility, cellular stress response, immune suppression, and disturbance of energy metabolism.[ 12 , 15 , 16 , 18 , 19 , 74 , 78 , 70 , 112 , 115 , 116 , 136 ] Note that oxidative stress is associated with various chronic diseases and cancer and leads to aging.[ 63 ] As a result, constant exposure to electromagnetic radiation from wireless technologies accelerates aging.

Neuropsychiatric effects caused by non-thermal microwave radiofrequencies (RFs) have been widely documented: sleep disturbance, headache, depressive symptoms, fatigue, concentration dysfunction, memory changes, dizziness, irritability, electroencephalogram changes, etc.[ 111 , 112 ] These behavioral problems can extend to suicidal thoughts in children and adolescents.[ 65 , 109 ]

EHS was first described as microwave syndrome or microwave illness: behavioral and nervous system effects, fatigue, pain, depression, fainting, sleep disorders, etc.[ 27 ] Then, it was refined and completed by headache, tinnitus, hyperacusis, superficial and/or deep sensibility abnormalities, fibromyalgia, vegetative nerve dysfunction and reduced cognitive capability, transient cardiovascular dysfunction, and loss of appetite.[ 16 , 17 ]

Superimposing 5G radiation on an already toxic wireless radiation environment will exacerbate adverse health effects. The 5G mmWaves network will affect not only the skin and eyes but also the heart, liver, kidney, spleen tissue, blood, and bone marrow.[ 74 ] In mice, exposure to 5G at 4.9 GHz induces depressive-like behavior, which may be associated with neuronal pyroptosis in the amygdala.[ 120 ] 5G at 3.5 GHz can also rapidly cause microwave syndrome.[ 108 ] The interaction of mmWaves with the structure and function of pertinent cellular elements and cutaneous neuroreceptors in the skin are of special concern. There are not enough studies on 5G mmWaves to reach a confident judgment.[ 97 ]

Despite the many warnings sent to the European Union (EU) and WHO over several years by hundreds of scientists and publications, health authorities continue to ignore the biological effects of non-thermal microwave radiation,[ 52 , 106 , 107 ] leading to criminal attitude from the EU.[ 107 ] Although children are more vulnerable than adults to radiation from wireless technologies,[ 16 ] ICNIRP considers that the limit values it proposes provide greater protection for children, stipulating that they would be better thermoregulated than adults.[ 69 ]

Fauna and flora are also constantly under assault from wireless communication technologies [ 85 , 86 ] without any environmental standards being set.[ 87 ]

Thus, the protective limits given by ICNIRP in 2020 protect neither health nor the environment from RF microwaves, including 5G.[ 70 , 74 , 106 ]

In 2020, two Members (Buncher and Rivasi) of the European Parliament commissioned, coordinated, and published a report on the ICNIRP showing that this scientific organization is « captured by industry » and is therefore unable to provide a reliable assessment of current scientific knowledge.[ 129 ] It should be noted that Italy has a 10-time lower exposure limit with no detrimental effects for industry.[ 106 ] «The media, WHO, and the governments are not transmitting information to the population, who remain uninformed.»[ 12 ]

Consequently, the harmfulness of guidelines is intentional, and biological effects are not collateral damage. This study aims to show the real objectives of wireless communication technologies, disguised as scientific progress, and the methods (e.g., combined with nanomaterials) used to achieve them. The neurological system, mainly the human brain, is targeted.

INTENTIONAL IRRADIATION OF THE POPULATION

WHO, EU, pharmaceutical industry

Pharmaceutical companies are well known for their scientific misconduct, their conflicts of interest and their links with the WHO and EU, which induce political lies, as well as their links with the military.[ 37 ] It would seem that the same behavior applies to the telecommunications industry.[ 56 , 129 ] In 2019, a document from the French Ministry of Economy and Finance recommended, for health purposes, increasing the participation of pharmaceutical companies in the international race to use electromagnetic and acoustic non-ionizing waves.[ 41 ] This raises the possibility of direct conflicts of interest between the pharmaceutical and telecommunications industries.

Given the large number of known pathologies triggered by the non-thermal microwave RFs, as well as the conflicts of interest between pharmaceutical companies and the telecommunications industry with the WHO and EU, we wonder whether: Would not microwaves and wireless devices also serve to increase the number of pathologies (mainly neurodegenerative) to justify research into body-implantable medical nanotechnology (see later section on graphene)?

Microwave interaction with atmospheric particles

The vast majority of laboratory experiments do not take into account the synergistic adverse effects of other toxic stimuli (e.g., chemical and biological) acting in conjunction with wireless radiation.[ 74 ]

As microwave RFs induces BBB permeability, this inevitably leads to increased absorption of micro- and nanoparticles (e.g., aluminum), which can be found in growing quantities in the atmosphere, raising the number of cases of neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer’s.[ 36 ] Moreover, electromagnetic radiation modifies the physical properties of atmospheric microparticles. The number of particles increases, and their morphologies, movements, and trajectories are altered.[ 64 ] These additional parameters need to be taken into account for public health.

Army in background

In Australia, government advisory agencies must support government plans for an Internet of Things (IoT) and smart cities (dependent on wireless technologies) to the detriment of people’s health. In addition, changes to RF standards to protect health and the environment are not permitted if they are prejudicial to departments of defense or national security.[ 132 ]

At the beginning of the 1976 US military report, it is written that if microwave radiation exposure standards in the most advanced Western countries are as strict as in the (at the time) Communist countries, there could be adverse effects on industrial production and military functions.[ 1 ]

The military role is preponderant in understanding the deployment of wireless technologies, mainly 5G, and the authorized standards. For more than half a century, the US military has been seeking to master mind control using various technologies, including electromagnetic waves.[ 35 ] Connecting the human brain to the machine has been one of the most important military objectives (through DARPA) for decades (p. 20-32).[ 58 ]

Given that DNA damage is a known side-effect of microwave RFs,[ 115 ] we might also wonder whether one of the aims of this intentional microwave irradiation, at these levels of power density, would be to create a form of genetic mutation conducive to the future human-machine fusion (see last part of the article).

5G WILL MAINLY BE USED BY THE ARMY

The most important applications of 5G technology will not be in the civilian sector but in the military and secret services. Here are just a few examples of military applications that can be realized with 5G: Optimizing the use of hypersonic weapons; increasing the lethality and precision of killer drones and war robots by facial recognition and other features; developing “autonomous military vehicles” (i.e., robotic air, land, and sea vehicles capable of autonomous attack missions without even being remotely piloted). 5G mobile networks made up of assembly and disassembly towers will be set up in less than an hour. As part of NATO, the Pentagon is making it clear that allied territories need to be convinced of the military benefits of 5G. The network is being set up by private companies, which will charge civilian users for 5G, thus considerably reducing military expenditure compared with installing the network solely for the military in many countries.[ 38 - 40 , 49 , 66 ] 5G mmWaves will, therefore essentially have a warfare purpose.

5G technology originates from military technology because 5G phased array and beam steering capabilities originate from military radar technology.[ 85 , 132 ]

PULSED MICROWAVE BEAM ATTACKS

Between 1953 and 1976, the Soviets irradiated the US embassy in Moscow with microwaves (2.5–4.0 GHz at intensities of up to 18 µW/cm²) at power densities well below the current limits recommended by the ICNIRP.[ 27 , 100 ] Despite this, symptoms were consistent with microwave sickness syndrome.[ 27 ] The cancer cases were not publicly acknowledged, but the official report was seriously questioned.[ 27 , 100 ]

From 2016 to 2017, state and CIA personnel stationed in Cuba (Havana) complained of several symptoms with similarities to those in Moscow: noises (many diplomats heard chirping, ringing, or grinding noises at night during episodes reportedly triggering health problems), hearing loss, tinnitus, sleep problems, headaches, cognitive problems dominate, sensations of pressure or vibration, vision, balance, speech problems, nosebleeds, neurological symptoms, brain injury, and brain swelling.[ 56 , 100 , 130 ] The findings suggest potential exposure to directional phenomena,[ 130 ] which would correspond to the use of pulsed RF microwaves.[ 56 ]

Since 2018, other diplomats, as well as US intelligence personnel in various locations around the world (China, Germany, Australia, Russia, Taiwan, Washington, Austria, Georgia, Poland, Colombia, Kyrgyzstan, and Uzbekistan), have complained of the same symptoms, named “Havana syndrome” (problems with balance and vertigo, coordination, eye movement; anxiety; irritability; brain damage; “cognitive fog”).[ 84 ] The acute symptoms include headache and nausea immediately following the sounds of loud buzzing or bursts. Testimonies report a directional sound coming from above or behind the head.[ 94 ] According to a report by US National Academy of Sciences, directed, pulsed RF microwave energy is the most likely cause of these symptoms.[ 84 , 94 ]

There are new weapons using microwave frequencies, able to disrupt brain function without any burning sensation. «The microwave auditory effect occurs from a miniscule but rapid (µs) rise of temperature (10⁻⁶ °C) in the brain from the absorption of pulsed microwave radiation. The sudden rise in temperature creates a thermoelastic expansion of the brain matter, which can launch a pressure wave that propagates through the head and is detected by the sensory hair cells in the cochlea. The nerve signal is then relayed to the central auditory system for perception and recognition». This auditory effect of microwaves can become a non-lethal or lethal weapon.[ 95 ] The target would first feel the pressure wave as a sound. This has been confirmed by numerous American diplomats, spies, soldiers, and officials in Havana. A small piece of equipment would suffice.[ 20 ]

To generate a high-power microwave-induced acoustic pressure level inside the human brain, the theoretical temperature rise induced by microwave pulses should not exceed 1°C, which is “safe,” according to ICNIRP.[ 96 ]

THE NEW WAR

In 2021, two senior US Air Force officers presented a thesis at the Naval Postgraduate School (operated by the United States Navy) explaining that the war is now neurological: “Neurowar,” with cognitive functions as the main target.[ 58 ] Manipulating, influencing, and controlling both adversaries and the population are the objectives of this neurological warfare.[ 58 ] The manipulation of information to influence the population will have its limits when the population becomes aware of it. The next stage will, therefore, correspond directly to large-scale brain manipulation (p. 10).[ 58 ] For these senior US Air Force officers, Havana Syndrome (200 cases in 16 countries) corresponds to a new form of attack, but also of war, which is already underway, and whose target is the human brain (which is currently at the center of a biotechnological revolution).[ 58 ]

Neurological weapons aim to affect cognitive, emotional, and/or motor activity and capability to achieve specific and predictable behavior, that is, total mind control (p. 30-31).[ 58 ]

Neurological weapons can be either pharmacological, biological, or electromagnetic (RF directed energy weapons [DEWs], RF/acoustic weapons, ultrasonic weapons, high-powered microwaves, low-powered waves set at the right frequency, particle beams…) (p. 30-31).[ 58 ] The authors also suggest that cases of Havana Syndrome are the result of the use of a directed energy microwave weapon (p. 86).[ 58 ] One of the problems of this new warfare (using DEWs) is the lack of medical strategies to deal with the unconventional injuries caused by this kind of weapon.[ 99 ]

Specific kinds of waves, modulated RFs between 0.4 and 3 GHz and an average power density at least as low as 400 µW/cm², can cause noises or sounds heard as real directly in the head or just behind without causing any discernible injury to neural or labyrinthine tissues.[ 53 , 58 ] However, high-frequency microwaves, in particular mmWaves, have characteristics that make them more suitable for “stealth” attacks. Indeed, mmWaves cause less interference with ordinary electronics and cannot be detected with ordinary RF survey meters. In addition, the equipment is smaller and can be placed much closer to the target, enabling higher exposure levels.[ 51 ] Starting in the 1970s, Russian scientists showed that low-intensity microwaves could be used as a weapon to disorient and affect behavior and during interrogations.[ 100 ]

Both in the 50–70s and from 2016 to 2021, the symptoms of microwave attacks correspond, for the most part, to the same symptoms as EHS.[ 56 ] It should be noted that, on average, 3–5% of the population in many countries or regions of the world is EHS, and up to 13.3% of the population may be RF-sensitive.[ 17 ]

While the United Nations has put in place treaties against biological and chemical weapons, most neurological weapons currently fall into a legal and regulatory vacuum, as they do not correspond to any of these categories (p. 34).[ 58 ]

Consequently, the effects of ambient electromagnetic pollution caused by the microwaves of wireless technologies are comparable to the effects of pulsed RF directed energy (DE) microwave weapons. In addition to making people ill, the constant increase in the ambient level of high-frequency electromagnetic waves is changing people’s behavior.

NON-LETHAL MICROWAVES DEWs

A DEW is a system using DE primarily as a means to incapacitate, damage, disable, or destroy enemy equipment, facilities, and/or personnel.[ 34 ] Specific examples of DE use by the military include lasers, RF devices, high-power microwave, millimeter wave, and particle beam technology.[ 125 ]

« Millimeter wave DE has various non-lethal military applications, including crowd control and area denial. Although proven to be very safe, millimeter wave energy can produce significant injuries ».[ 57 ]

Thermal effect of microwave DEWs

The Active Denial System (ADS) produces beam high power mmWaves (95 GHz) to non-lethally heat the topmost layer of human skin, acting to effectively deny people access to locations (p. 18).[ 125 ] The system is mounted on a vehicle and used for crowd control, but it could be miniaturized and carried by a person [ Figure 2 ] (p. 98-100).[ 58 ] In 2010, a patent explained the operation of a portable weapon radiating millimeter microwaves from 94 to 96 GHz (without being limited to this frequency range) and able to vary the power density for non-lethal purposes.[ 98 ]

Figure 2:

Illustration of Active Denial System (photograph from [p. 100]).[ 58]

Auditory effect of microwave DEWs

In 1989, a patent showed that it was possible to induce sound in the head of an irradiated person using microwaves (0.1–10 GHz) modulated with a particular waveform while respecting the imposed standards.[ 22 ]

The US Army has developed a weapon system based on the auditory effect of microwaves, Mob Excess Deterrent Using Silent Audio (MEDUSA). The result is a strong sonic sensation in the human head when irradiated by specifically selected low-energy microwave pulses. It is specified that the system should be portable, require little energy, and be able to control a crowd or a single individual. At present, no one knows the status of this program.[ 20 , 96 , 126 ]

Rollout of 5G and wireless technologies analyzed from another viewpoint

In 2001, a document from NASA showed how the style of warfare could evolve in the 2025s. Attack and/or retaliation techniques include the use of microwave RFs. This kind of radiation corresponds to an anti-functional and anti-personnel weapon and is apparently legal. Used at high power, this weapon acts by heat source, but when used at low power (in µW/cm² with a frequency range of 0.4–3 GHz) modulated at low frequency, this weapon alters cerebral functions, diminishes behavioral performance, and can become lethal. There is also talk of microwave RF towers used for selective anti-personnel purposes.[ 23 ]

As it is difficult to locate the source of the DE, DEWs are often used in special or covert operations. Authors of the US Air Force report assert that the world has reached a “ tipping point ” in which DE is now essential to successful military operations.[ 125 ]

Matthew and Kazaure[ 102 ] showed that due to the dipolar nature of the human body, the rollout of 5G technology at frequencies above 20 GHz will produce effects such as heating up of the body tissues due to electromagnetic field induction. This study established that any attempt to deploy 5G technology at ultra-high frequencies above 20 GHz corresponds to the deliberate use of an unconventional chemical weapon.[ 102 ]

Note that 5G mmWaves will use a frequency range extending to levels above 95 GHz, depending on the country.[ 118 ] Frequency bands up to 300 GHz have also been considered. In addition, the 6G network (planned for 2030) will add the frequency bands terahertz (THz), i.e. 300 GHz to 3 THz (submillimeter waves), to the mmWave bands, inducing a massive deployment of small cell networks.[ 13 , 29 , 31 ] In 2019, the French document from the French Ministry of Economy and Finance foresees the use of 5G at 38 and 60 GHz inside buildings. This document specifies that the induced accumulation of exposures (2G+, 3G, 4G, 5G, and IoT), their continuous nature over time, as well as the possible effects of millimeter emissions from the associated satellite coverage, have not been the subject of health and environmental impact studies (p. 33).[ 41 ]

NANOMATERIALS: THE CASE OF GRAPHENE

The ideal nanomaterial for future medicine

From 2013 to 2023, the EU launched a huge research program on graphene (just one layer of carbon atoms whose stacking forms graphite), with the aim of its commercial application in many sectors, including biomedical and healthcare.[ 59 , 93 ] Graphene can be used to detect, treat, and manage diseases of the nervous system using neural implants (which can be used to record or stimulate electrical activity in nerve tissue) or for drug delivery.[ 44 ] According to the roadmap for graphene use in the medical sector, biosensors are already in use, neural interface from 2029, drug delivery, and bioelectronic medicine from 2030.[ 61 ] At the same time, the « Human Brain Project » was launched with the aim of better understanding how the brain works, mainly for medical purposes.[ 68 ]

Graphene oxide (GO) is considered a very good candidate for future vaccine adjuvants.[ 10 , 26 , 119 , 127 , 134 , 140 ] Graphene is also widely studied in dentistry, mainly as an anesthetic, but also for its antimicrobial action, regenerative dentistry, bone tissue engineering, drug delivery, physicomechanical property enhancement of dental biomaterials, and oral cancer treatment.[ 7 , 28 , 88 , 90 , 91 , 103 , 104 , 122 ] Inhalation of GO (for diagnostic purposes and to deliver drugs for respiratory diseases) is also being studied.[ 5 ]

In addition to the recognized biological toxicity of graphene-family nanomaterials,[ 110 , 133 ] these nanoparticles are already present in the environment and accumulate, for example, in food-chain plants.[ 131 ]

COVID-19 vaccines

In 2022, a study showed that among various types of nanomaterials, GO and carbon nanotubes (cylindrically shaped nanostructures made by sheets of graphene rolled up to form hollow tubes) are among the possible adjuvants for COVID-19 vaccines.[ 4 ]

The presence of graphene in COVID-19 vaccines is totally refuted by the European Medicines Agency (EMA).[ 42 ] However, not only EMA is tainted,[ 37 ] but also the presence of graphene, micro- and nanostructures as well as undeclared metal-containing components have been repeatedly detected in COVID-19 vaccines. Some of these results, discovered by several respected scientists in their fields, have not been published in peer-reviewed journals [ Figure 3 ],[ 9 , 24 , 25 ], while others are available in the scientific literature.[ 71 , 72 , 137 ] GOs, reduced GOs (rGOs), and the related derivatives possess self-assembly capabilities enabling the construction of advanced graphene-based materials or functional systems,[ 124 ] which could partly explain the detection of certain nanostructures. By culture of COVID-19 vaccine samples (mainly Pfizer and Moderna), a study showed (using a stereomicroscope) the self-assembly of artificial structures of various shapes (animated worm-like entities, discs, chains, spirals, tubes, right-angle structures containing other artificial entities within them, etc.), reacting, among other factors, to several frequencies of electromagnetic fields. The authors of this study assume that some form of nanotechnology (without specifying the exact nature of its components) was intentionally added to COVID-19 vaccines, whose purpose is to self-assemble into pre-programmed structures under the effect of different energy sources.[ 82 ]

Figure 3:

Some examples of COVID-19 vaccines analysis photographs. (a) 1h27’56’’; (b) 1h31’; (c) 1h31’17’’: Undeclared components of the COVID-19 vaccines.[ 9 ] (d and e): Microscopic objects and structures found in Pfizer vaccines by Dr. Campra.[ 24 ] Numerous other photographs of COVID-19 vaccine analyses showing microstructures, objects and graphene have been taken by Dr. Campra.[ 25]

In addition, analyses of blood samples from subjects after injections of COVID-19 vaccines showed the presence of particles, which, according to the authors of these publications, would correspond to GO.[ 33 , 72 , 83 ] This presence of graphene would contribute to the side effects associated with COVID-19 vaccines.[ 6 ]

Suitable for very high frequencies

Graphene can be used to build nanoantennas and transceivers.[ 29 ] Graphene nanomaterials (e.g., GO and rGO) are particularly well suited to interconnecting biomaterials with RF microwaves.[ 80 ] Graphene is widely used for its electrical properties and high conductivity.[ 32 , 60 ] In addition, GO has a high potential for transmitting signals at GHz ranges (0.5–40 GHz),[ 73 ] and millimeter frequencies seem perfectly adapted to graphene micro antennas.[ 76 ] A study showed that using a system of GO nanoparticles reacting to the electric field, a cell phone can control the rate of drug release remotely for on demand administration,[ 121 ] representing an example of a partnership between the pharmaceutical and telecommunications industries.

Moreover, a graphene monolayer can multiply frequencies from GHz to THz, generating electronic signals in the THz range with very high efficiency.[ 45 , 62 ] Graphene will, therefore, be well suited to directional radiation in the THz band for 6G communications.[ 2 ]

Intrabody nanorobots

The literature confirms that graphene can be used as a base material for intrabody nanomachines (sensors, routers, antennas, etc.),[ 67 , 81 , 92 , 135 ] with the aim of wireless nanocommunications through internet between the human body and objects (Internet of Nano Things).[ 11 , 77 ] Carbon nanotubes are able to create hybrid systems with the natural neural system and affect specific cell behaviors.[ 46 ] Graphene can also be used to create a brain interface due to its perfect compatibility with the brain’s neural system,[ 47 ] opening the way to the exploitation and control of the brain.[ 50 ] The hydrogel allows these graphene nanomaterials to be accepted by the human body, thus representing the ideal interface in human-machine fusion.[ 138 ]

To perform complex tasks, intrabody nanorobots need to collaborate and organize themselves within a nanonetwork that can be hybrid wired/wireless. Communication between intrabody nanonetworks can be electromagnetic or molecular (the absence or presence of a certain type of molecule to encode messages digitally).[ 135 ] In addition, they self-power by harvesting energy from their environment (blood vessels) and their energy is mainly used for the transmission and reception of wireless communication signals.[ 8 ]

The efficient transmission of nanotechnology signals and data over the nanonetwork is managed by a routing system called Coordinate and Routing System for Nanonetworks (CORONA).[ 123 ] The most suitable frequency band for these intrabody nanonetworks seems to be THz.[ 3 , 81 ] The few studies concerning the biological effects of THz already show consequences such as modification of the properties of cell membranes, pore formation, modulation of cell viability and proliferation. However, the authors point out that there is a lack of standardized experimental methods.[ 30 ]

Therefore, as some scientists suggest, these micro- and nanostructures observed in COVID-19 vaccines could be part of an intrabody network of wireless nanomachines, but the many conflicts of interest within the health authorities (e.g., EMA and WHO) inevitably lead to highly biased expert assessments and responses, which means that the public is disinformed by part of the scientific community, politicians, and the media.[ 37 ]

In addition, if this graphene-based nanomachine technology has been injected through COVID-19 vaccines to react with the electromagnetic environment, its operation with the GHz band is not only current but also appears to be evolutionary and projected in time to be activated by the THz waves of the 6G network around the 2030s.

HUMAN-MACHINE FUSION (CYBORG)

Scientific publications and military documents clearly show that the goal for the coming years is human-machine fusion. Medicine will first employ graphene brain implants.[ 21 ] Carbon nanomaterials can be connected to implantable brain-computer interfaces (BCIs),[ 89 ] and graphene nanosensors appear suitable for operating non-invasive BCIs.[ 48 ]

Via the vascular circulation, nanorobots (some carbon nanomaterials are being studied) could cross the BBB and attach themselves to the axons of neurons in the brain, which could then connect to the internet cloud through a BCI.[ 101 ] It should be noted that optimizing a BCI seems to require the intervention of artificial intelligence (AI) to study brain functions, but also to identify and monitor the neurons that control behavior.[ 139 ] The huge volumes of data exchanged between the cloud and the human brain will require AI to manage these interactions, too.[ 101 ] 6G network applications (2030) will enable wireless brain-computer interaction.[ 31 ] While 5G will enable wireless communication between simple physical objects (IoT), 6G, in which AI will play a key role, will bring networked communication of humans, processes, files, and objects (Internet of Everything (IoE)), such as people-to-machine and people-to-people connections via the internet.[ 13 , 75 ]

In 2023, a NATO document on the biological functioning of cognitive warfare shows that one of the most promising nanotechnology projects is the development of integrated synthetic DNA. Although the document does not specify the materials used, this synthetic organic DNA could allow the creation of human-machine interfaces and is often referred to as the 47^th human chromosome. The paper explains that neural nanotechnology can be used to bring nano-sized robots closer to a neuron via the bloodstream and enable the human brain to be linked directly (i.e., not intercepted by our senses) to a computer using AI. The author specifies that this is a two-way street: such an IA will, in turn, be linked to a human brain.[ 128 ]

The army uses neurotechnology to treat or “improve” soldiers.[ 58 ] Thus, advances in military neurotechnology, robotics, and AI will make the « cyborg warrior » (cyborg: Cybernetic organism), a weaponized brain-computer network powered by AI and neurocognitive augmentation.[ 105 ] In 2019, a US army document, coauthored by renowned neuroscientist James Giordano, shows that human-machine fusion will appear before 2050, with the aim of improving functional and structural human capacities through the use of genetic engineering, synthetic biology, nanotechnology, AI, or any number of emerging technologies.[ 43 ] The four main objectives are ocular enhancements, restoration and programmed muscular control, auditory enhancement, and direct neural enhancement of the human brain for two-way data transfer. The assembly of nanoparticles in the brain (thus forming a BCI) could be positioned using directed magnetic fields. Although this report aims to present military cyborgs, the authors point out that not only will the civilian sector be in demand, but it is the medical sector that will familiarize the population with human-machine fusion and provide the military with a large proportion of the technological advances. In addition, the public will need to be educated about the benefits of becoming a cyborg. Cinema, media, literature, and governments must build messages to remove barriers to the adoption of these new technologies.[ 43 ]

The “benefits” (partly therapeutic, as it is also a question of increasing the capabilities of humans and other living beings) of designing hybrid systems between living beings and robotic systems have already begun in civil science.[ 54 ]

CONCLUSION

Scientific literature shows that the use of modulated/pulsed/polarized microwave RFs from wireless technologies, even well below international limits designed to protect the public, causes a number of very serious health consequences: (1) increased oxidative stress (itself linked to numerous pathologies, inflammation, DNA damage, and aging). This oxidative status also generates cellular stress and, consequently the cell’s response to this stress (i.e., cell cycle arrest, the repair process, and then the elimination of damaged molecular debris). If stress is too great and there is excessive molecular damage, the cell is irreparable and dies (apoptosis). This artificially induced premature cell death can lead to degenerative diseases. If repair is incomplete, the proliferation of damaged cells can trigger cancer. The cellular stress response to an electromagnetic field depends on the type of cell, the duration of exposure, and the characteristics of the electromagnetic field.[ 78 ] (2) Changes in intracellular calcium metabolism. (3) Structural injuries of immune tissues and functional impairment in immune cells. (4) Damage to the reproductive system. (5) Brain cancers (glioma, meningioma, acoustic neuroma). (6) Increased BBB permeability (allowing certain toxins direct access to the central nervous system). (7) Increased risk of cardiomyopathy. (8) Microwave RF also leads to the onset of microwave syndrome, also known as EHS (i.e., headache, tinnitus, chronic insomnia, fatigue, nausea, dizziness, irritability, depressive tendencies, cognitive dysfunction, and impaired memory). Depending on the individual’s level of sensitivity and the duration of exposure, submission to the electromagnetic waves of wireless technologies induces behavioral changes.

NATO explains that cognitive warfare consists of exploiting emotions rooted in the subconscious, targeting the amygdala through the use of nanotechnology, biotechnology, and information technology, among others. The ultimate aim is to alter our perception of reality to affect our decision-making. NATO insists that this is a war without rules, that it is not science fiction, and that it is already happening, but also that cognitive attack is aimed at both military personnel and civilians. Targeting is hyper-personalized. Among civilians, those most vulnerable to such attacks may be, for example, those who lack confidence in governance and social structures.[ 128 ]

To sum up

For decades, the military has been determined to find ways of mind control

Consequently, we can conclude that the irradiation, with such standards, by the wireless technologies developed by the telecommunications industry corresponds to an intentional strategy from the military-industrial complex and part of the political establishment to affect the cognitive functions of the population. Graphene nanoparticles exacerbate, or will exacerbate (depending on whether they are already present in the body), the deleterious neurological effects of 5G and will progressively connect the human brain to the Internet through 6G, with the aim (a few years later) of merging man with machine [ Figure 4 ].

Figure 4:

Control and gradual transformation of humanity. EHS: Electro-Hypersensitivity, DECT: Digital Enhanced Cordless Telecommunications, BCIs: Brain-Computer Interfaces, IoE: Internet of Everything.

Since the official channel for health information (WHO, media, and politics) is corrupted, it becomes necessary to disseminate verified and verifiable information. In addition, it is essential that all scientists, with no conflicts of interest, capable of publishing scientifically, with the appropriate equipment and an approved laboratory, analyze the components of all vaccines (including those in COVID-19) as well as dental anesthetics and publish their results in good scientific journals. If it proves that organisms indeed contain graphene, studies on chelating agents such as N-acetylcysteine and calcium disodium ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid would be necessary. It is also becoming vital to stay as far away as possible from powerful sources of high-frequency electromagnetic radiation (antennas, WiFi, etc.) and to use all types of wireless technology as little as possible.

Ethical approval

The Institutional Review Board approval is not required.

Declaration of patient consent

Patient’s consent was not required as there are no patients in this study.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

Use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for manuscript preparation

The authors confirm that there was no use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for assisting in the writing or editing of the manuscript and no images were manipulated using AI.

Disclaimer

The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of the Journal or its management. The information contained in this article should not be considered to be medical advice; patients should consult their own physicians for advice as to their specific medical needs.

References

1. Adams RLWilliams RA. Biological effects of electromagnetic radiation (Radiowaves and Microwaves) Eurasian Communist Countries. Available from: https://www.orsaa.org/uploads/6/7/7/9/67791943/__us_dia_1976_biological_effects_of_electromagnetic_radiation.pdf [Last accessed on 2024 Feb 29].

2. Ai H, Kang Q, Wang W, Guo K, Guo Z. Multi-beam steering for 6G communications based on graphene metasurfaces. Sensors (Basel). 2021. 21: 4784

3. Akkaş MA. Nano-sensor modelling for intra-body nano-networks. Wireless Pers Commun. 2021. 118: 3129-43

4. Alphandéry E. Nano dimensions/adjuvants in COVID-19 vaccines. J Mater Chem B. 2022. 10: 1520-52

5. Andrews JP, Joshi SS, Tzolos E, Syed MB, Cuthbert H, Crica LE. First-in-human controlled inhalation of thin graphene oxide nanosheets to study acute cardiorespiratory responses. Nat Nanotechnol. 2024. 19: 705-14

6. Anilanmert B, Rayimoglu G, Yonar FC. Side effects of COVID vaccines and the contribution of graphene. J Res Pharm. 2023. 27: 21-7

7. Armaković S, Mirjanić Đ, Pelemiš SS, Armaković SJ. Understanding interactions between graphene and local anesthetic molecules applied in dentistry-Toward the prolonged effects of local anesthesia. J Mol Liquids. 2022. 36: 120301

8. Asghari M. Intrabody hybrid perpetual nanonetworks based on simultaneous wired and wireless nanocommunications. Nano Commun Networks. 2022. 84: 100406

9. Austrian Research Gro, editors. Press conference: Undeclared components of the COVID-19 vaccines. Pathological institute in Reutlingen. Austrian Research Group. 2021. p. Available from: https://www.pathologie-konferenz.de/en; https://odysee.com/@en:a5/PK_Tot-durch-Impfung_english:a [Last accessed on 2024 Feb 25]

10. Bai Q, Wang Z, An Y, Tian J, Li Z, Yang Y. Chitosanfunctionalized graphene oxide as adjuvant in HEV P239 vaccine. Vaccine. 2022. 40: 7613-21

11. Balghusoon AO, Mahfoudh S. Routing protocols for wireless nanosensor networks and internet of nano things: A comprehensive survey. IEEE Access. 2020. 8: 200724-48

12. Balmori A. Evidence for a health risk by RF on humans living around mobile phone base stations: From radiofrequency sickness to cancer. Environ Res. 2022. 214: 113851

13. Banafaa M, Shayea I, Din J, Azmi MH, Alashbi A, Daradkeh IY. 6G Mobile communication technology: Requirements, targets, applications, challenges, advantages, and opportunities. Alexandria Eng J. 2023. 64: 245-74

14. Banik S, Bandyopadhyay S, Ganguly S. Bioeffects of microwave--a brief review. Bioresour Technol. 2003. 87: 155-9

15. Bektas H, Dasdag S, Altindag F, Akdag MZ, Yegin K, Algul S. Effects of 3.5-GHz radiofrequency radiation on energy-regulatory hormone levels in the blood and adipose tissue. Bioelectromagnetics. 2024. 45: 209-17

16. Belpomme D, Hardell L, Belyaev I, Burgio E, Carpenter DO. Thermal and non-thermal health effects of low intensity nonionizing radiation: An international perspective. Environ Pollut. 2018. 242: 643-58

17. Belpomme D, Irigaray P. Why electrohypersensitivity and related symptoms are caused by non-ionizing man-made electromagnetic fields: An overview and medical assessment. Environ Res. 2022. 212: 113374

18. Belyaev I. Nonthermal biological effects of microwaves: Current knowledge, further perspective, and urgent needs. Electromagn Biol Med. 2009. 24: 375-403

19. BioInitiative Working Group. 2012 BioInitiative report. Available from: https://bioinitiative.org [Last accessed on 2024 Mar 11].

20. Borger J. Microwave weapons that could cause Havana Syndrome exist, experts say. Available from: https://www.theguardian.com/science/2021/jun/02/microwave-weapons-havana-syndrome-experts [Last accessed on 2024 Feb 09].

21. Bramini M, Alberini G, Colombo E, Chiacchiaretta M, DiFrancesco ML, Maya-Vetencourt JF. Interfacing graphene-based materials with neural cells. Front Syst Neurosci. 2018. 12: 12

22. Brunkan WB. Hearing system. Available from: https://patents.google.com/patent/US4877027A/en [Last accessed on 2024 Feb 21].

23. Bushnell DN, editors. Future strategic issues/future warfare [Circa 2025]. Chief Scientist. NASA Langley Research Center. 2001. p. 48 49, 50, 55, 98, 103. Available from: https://archive.org/details/FutureStrategicIssuesFutureWarfareCirca2025 https://archive.org/download/Nasa-dokument-future-strategic-issues-future-warfare-circa-2025 [Last accessed on 2024 Feb 22]

24. Campra P. DNA crystals nanotechnology in Covid-19 vaccines?. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/358284707_dna_crystals_nanotechnology_in_covid19_vaccines-interviewwithdrcamprainmadrid2022 [Last accessed on 2024 Feb 25].

25. Campra P. Microstructures in Covid Vaccines: ¿Inorganic Crystals or Wireless Nanosensors Network?. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/356507702_microstructures_in_covid_vaccines_inorganic_crystals_or_wireless_nanosensors_network [Last accessed on 2024 Aug 20]. Detection of Graphene in Covid-19 Vaccines; 2021. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/355979001_detection_of_graphene_in_covid19_vaccines [Last accessed on 2024 Aug 20]. Microscopic Objects Frequently Observed in mRNA Covid-19 Vaccines; 2021. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/356002064_microscopic_objects_frequently_observed_in_mrna_covid19_vaccines [Last accessed on 2024 Aug 20].

26. Cao W, He L, Cao W, Huang X, Jia K, Dai J. Recent progress of graphene oxide as a potential vaccine carrier and adjuvant. Acta Biomater. 2020. 112: 14-28

27. Carpenter DO. The microwave syndrome or electro-hypersensitivity: Historical background. Rev Environ Health. 2015. 30: 217-22

28. Castro-Rojas MA, Vega-Cantu YI, Cordell GA, Rodriguez-Garcia A. Dental applications of carbon nanotubes. Molecules. 2021. 26: 4423

29. Chataut R, Akl R. Massive MIMO systems for 5G and beyond networks-overview, recent trends, challenges, and future research direction. Sensors (Basel). 2020. 20: 2753

30. Cherkasova OP, Serdyukov DS, Ratushnyak AS, Nemova EF, Kozlov EN, Shidlovskii YV. Effects of terahertz radiation on living cells: A review. Opt Spectrosc. 2020. 128: 855-66

31. Chowdhury MZ, Shahjalal M, Ahmed S, Jang YM. 6G wireless communication systems: Applications, requirements, technologies, challenges, and research directions. IEEE Open J Commun Soc. 2020. 1: 957-75

32. ChunKan T, Rui T, Tianyou K, MengYao H, YuJing W, MingJie Y. Graphene superconductivity at room-temperature of a wide range and standard atmosphere, based on vacuum channels and white-light interferometry. Adv Electron Mater. 2022. 8: 2100595

33. Cipelli RB, Giovannini F, Pisano G. Dark-field microscopic analysis on the blood of 1,006 symptomatic persons after anti-COVID mRNA injections from pfizer/BioNtech or moderna. Int J Vaccine Theory Pract Res. 2022. 2: 385-444

34. Congressional research servi, editors. U.S. Army weapons-related directed energy (DE) programs: Background and potential issues for congress. R45098. 2018. p. Available from: https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/R/R45098 [Last accessed on 2024 Feb 16]

35. Deruelle F. The different sources of electromagnetic fields: Dangers are not limited to physical health. Electromagn Biol Med. 2020. 39: 166-75

36. Deruelle F. Are persistent aircraft trails a threat to the environment and health?. Rev Environ Health. 2021. 37: 407-21

37. Deruelle F. The pharmaceutical industry is dangerous to health. Further proof with COVID-19. Surg Neurol Int. 2022. 13: 475

38. Dinucci M. The hidden military use of 5G technology. Available from: https://www.voltairenet.org/article199819.html [Last accessed on 2024 Feb 03].

39. Dinucci M. 5G. the new track of the arms race. Available from: https://www.voltairenet.org/article210082.html [Last accessed on 2024 Feb 03].

40. Dinucci M. Le côté obscur de la 5G: L’utilisation militaire. Available from: https://www.voltairenet.org/article210788.html [Last accessed on 2024 Feb 03].

41. Dron DMagne YPavel I. Enjeux des usages industriels et commerciaux des ondes non ionisantes électromagnétiques et acoustiques. 2019. Conseil général de l’économie N 2018/12/CGE/SR. Available from: https://documentation.insp.gouv.fr/insp/doc/viepublique/3951e2ee6f57ee28c28087b7d0707b66/enjeux-des-usages-industriels-et-commerciaux-des-ondesnon-ionisantes-electromagnetiques-et-acoustiq?_lg=fr-FR https://www.vie-publique.fr/rapport/273151-usages-des-ondes-non-ionisantes-electromagnetiques-et-acoustiques [Last accessed on 2024 Feb 03].

42. EMA. Answer on behalf of the European Commission. Available from: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/P-9-2022-000303-ASW_EN.html [Last accessed on 2024 Apr 11].

43. Emanuel P, Walper S, DiEuliis D, Klein N, Petro JB, Giordano J. Cyborg soldier 2050: human/machine fusion and the implications for the future of the DoD U.S. Army. CCDC CBC-TR-1599. 2019. p. Available from: https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/citations/AD1083010 [Last accessed on 2024 Mar 30]

44. European Commission. Graphene-based revolutions in ICT and beyond. Available from: https://cordis.europa.eu/article/id/243655-biomedical-advances-through-use-of-graphene [Last accessed on 2024 Feb 25].

45. European Commission. Graphene boosts GHz signals into terahertz territory. Available from: https://cordis.europa.eu/article/id/124280-graphene-boosts-ghz-signals-into-terahertz-territory [Last accessed on 2024 Feb 25].

46. Fabbro A, Bosi S, Ballerini L, Prato M. Carbon nanotubes: Artificial nanomaterials to engineer single neurons and neuronal networks. ACS Chem Neurosci. 2012. 3: 611-8

47. Fabbro A, Scaini D, León V, Vázquez E, Cellot G, Privitera G. Graphene-based interfaces do not alter target nerve cells. ACS Nano. 2016. 10: 615-23

48. Faisal SN, Do TN, Torzo T, Leong D, Pradeepkumar A, Lin C. Noninvasive sensors for brain-machine interfaces based on micropatterned epitaxial graphene. ACS Appl Nano Mater. 2023. 6: 5440-7

49. Fields C. Defense Science Board Task Force: Defense applications of 5G network technology. Available from: https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/citations/AD1078719 [Last accessed on 2024 Feb 05].

50. Fogden S. Graphene and Neurons-the best of friends. Available from: https://graphene-flagship.eu/materials/news/graphene-based-interfaces-do-not-alter-target-nerve-cells [Last accessed on 2024 Mar 28].

51. Foster KR, Garrett DC, Ziskin MC. Can the microwave auditory effect be “Weaponized”?. Front Public Health. 2021. 9: 788613

52. Frank JWMelnick Ronald LMoskowitz JM. A critical appraisal of the WHO 2024 systematic review of the effects of RF-EMF exposure on tinnitus, migraine/headache, and non-specific symptoms. Available from: https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/reveh-2024-0069/html.

53. Frey AH. Human auditory system response to modulated electromagnetic energy. J Appl Physiol. 1962. 17: 689-92

54. Fukuda T. Cyborg and bionic systems: Signposting the future. Cyborg Bionic Syst. 2020. 2020: 1310389 (See mission and scope of Journal: https://spj.science.org/page/cbsystems/about)

55. Georgiou CD, Kalaitzopoulou E, Skipitari M, Papadea P, Varemmenou A, Gavriil V. Physical differences between man-made and cosmic microwave electromagnetic radiation and their exposure limits, and radiofrequencies as generators of biotoxic free radicals. Radiation. 2022. 2: 285-302

56. Golomb BA. Diplomats’ mystery illness and pulsed radiofrequency/microwave radiation. Neural Comput. 2018. 30: 2882-985

57. Government of Canada. Directed energy weapons. Available from: https://science.gc.ca/site/science/en/safeguarding-your-research/guidelines-and-tools-implement-research-security/emerging-technology-trend-cards/directed-energy-weapons [Last accessed on 2024 Feb 16].

58. Gramm JD, Branagan BA. Neurowar is here! Master’s Thesis. Naval Postgraduate School Monterey, CA 93943-5000. 2021. p. Available from: https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/trecms/pdf/AD1164923.pdf [Last accessed on 2024 Feb 12]

59. Graphene Flagship. Available from: https://graphene-flagship.eu [Last accessed on 2024 Feb 25].

60. , editors. Graphene Flagship. Healing wounds with graphene. 2020. p. Available from: https://graphene-flagship.eu/media/8d8d1c8f4f989cf/graphene-healthcare-minimag-2020.pdf [Last accessed on 2024 Feb 25]

61. Graphene Flagship Technology and Innovation Roadmap. Available from: https://graphene-flagship.eu/industrialisation/roadmap https://graphene-flagship.eu/industrialisation/roadmap/biomedical-applications https://graphene-flagship.eu/focus/biomedical [Last accessed on 2024 Feb 25].

62. Hafez HA, Kovalev S, Deinert JC, Mics Z, Green B, Awari N. Extremely efficient terahertz high-harmonic generation in graphene by hot Dirac fermions. Nature. 2018. 561: 507-11

63. Hajam YA, Rani R, Ganie SY, Sheikh TA, Javaid D, Qadri SS. Oxidative stress in human pathology and aging: Molecular mechanisms and perspectives. Cells. 2022. 11: 552

64. Han B, Ming Z, Zhao Y, Wen T, Xie M. Influence of space electromagnetic radiation on physical characteristics of atmospheric suspended micro particles. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci. 2023. 1171: 012063

65. Hedendahl LK, Carlberg M, Koppel T, Hardell L. Measurements of radiofrequency radiation with a body-borne exposimeter in Swedish schools with WiFi. Front Public Health. 2017. 5: 279

66. Hoehn JR, Sayler KM, editors. National security implications of fifth generation (5G) mobile technologies. Congressional Research Service 2020, 2022, 2023. p. Available from: https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/IF/IF11251/3 https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/citations/AD1166539 https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/IF/IF11251 [Last accessed on 2024 Feb 05]

67. Huang H, Su S, Wu N, Wan H, Wan S, Bi H. Graphene-based sensors for human health monitoring. Front Chem. 2019. 7: 399

68. Human Brain Project. Available from: https://www.humanbrainproject.eu/en/ [Last accessed on 2024 Apr 12].

69. ICNIRP (International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protectio. Guidelines for limiting exposure to electromagnetic fields (100 kHz to 300 GHz). Health Phys. 2020. 118: 483-524

70. International Commission on the Biological Effects of Electromagnetic Fields (ICBE-E. Scientific evidence invalidates health assumptions underlying the FCC and ICNIRP exposure limit determinations for radiofrequency radiation: implications for 5G. Environ Health. 2022. 21: 92

71. Jeon KY. Moving and living micro-organisms in the COVID-19 vaccines-prevention, early treatment cocktails for covid-19 and detoxification methods to reduce sequels of Covid-19 vaccines. Am J Epidemiol Public Health. 2022. 6: 1-6

72. Jeon KY, Park S, Broudy D, Joo HD. A presentation of analyses of COVID-19 vaccine samples, blood samples, urine samples, foot bath samples, sitz bath samples, and skin-extract samples. J Biomed Res Environ Sci. 2023. 4: 188-217

73. Kim WK, Jung Y, Cho JH, Kang JY, Oh J, Kang HS. Radio-frequency characteristics of graphene oxide. Appl Phys Lett. 2010. 97: 193103

74. Kostoff RN, Heroux P, Aschner M, Tsatsakis A. Adverse health effects of 5G mobile networking technology under real-life conditions. Toxicol Lett. 2020. 323: 35-40

75. Kremenska AG, Lekova AK, Dimitrov GP, editors. EEG brain-computer interfaces for internet of everything (IoE). 2022 International Conference on Information Technologies (InfoTech). Varna, Bulgaria: 2022. p. 1-6

76. Kumar C, Raghuwanshi SK, Kumar V. Graphene based microstrip patch antenna on photonic crystal substrate for 5G application. Front Mater. 2022. 9: 1079588

77. Kumar MR. A compact graphene based nano-antenna for communication in nano-network. J Inst Electron Comput. 2019. 1: 17-27

78. Lai H, Levitt BB. Cellular and molecular effects of nonionizing electromagnetic fields. Rev Environ Health. 2023. 39: 519-29

79. Landau E. Biological effects and health hazards of microwave radiation, proceedings on an international symposium, October, 1973. Am J Public Health. 1975. 65: 751

80. Lee HJ, Yook JG. Graphene nanomaterials-based radio-frequency/microwave biosensors for biomaterials detection. Materials (Basel). 2019. 12: 952

81. Lee SJ, Jung C (Andrew), Choi K, Kim S. Design of wireless nanosensor networks for intrabody application. Int J Distributed Sensor Networks. 2015. 11: 1-12

82. Lee YM, Broudy D. Real-time self-assembly of stereomicroscopically visible artificial constructions in incubated specimens of mRNA products mainly from pfizer and Moderna: A comprehensive longitudinal study. Int J Vaccine Theory Pract Res. 2024. 3: 1180-244

83. Lee YM, Park S, Jeon KY. Foreign materials in blood samples of recipients of COVID-19 vaccines. Int J Vaccine Theory Pract Res. 2022. 2: 249-65

84. Le Figaro. Syndrome de La Havane: Le chef de la CIA à Vienne limogé. Available from: https://www.lefigaro.fr/international/syndrome-de-la-havane-le-chef-de-la-cia-a-vienne-limoge-20210924 [Last accessed on 2024 Feb 09].

85. Levitt BB, Lai HC, Manville AM. Effects of non-ionizing electromagnetic fields on flora and fauna, part 1. Rising ambient EMF levels in the environment. Rev Environ Health. 2021. 37: 81-122

86. Levitt BB, Lai HC, Manville AM. Effects of non-ionizing electromagnetic fields on flora and fauna, Part 2 impacts: How species interact with natural and man-made EMF. Rev Environ Health. 2021. 37: 327-406

87. Levitt BB, Lai HC, Manville AM. Low-level EMF effects on wildlife and plants: What research tells us about an ecosystem approach. Front Public Health. 2022. 10: 1000840

88. Li H, Xie M. Synthesis of bupivacaine adsorbed reduced graphene oxide and its in-vitro local anesthetic, enhanced antimicrobial activity against dental implant pathogens. J Clust Sci. 2024. 35: 623-33

89. Li J, Cheng Y, Gu M, Yang Z, Zhan L, Du Z. Sensing and stimulation applications of carbon nanomaterials in implantable brain-computer interface. Int J Mol Sci. 2023. 24: 5182

90. Li W, Zhang G, Wei X. Lidocaine-loaded reduced graphene oxide hydrogel for prolongation of effects of local anesthesia: In vitro and in vivo analyses. J Biomater Appl. 2021. 35: 1034-42

91. Li X, Liang X, Wang Y, Wang D, Teng M, Xu H. Graphene-based nanomaterials for dental applications: Principles, current advances, and future outlook. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022. 10: 804201

92. Liaskos C, Tsioliaridou A, Ioannidis S, Kantartzis N, Pitsillides A, editors. A deployable routing system for nanonetworks. 2016 IEEE International conference on communications (ICC). Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: 2016. p. 1-6

93. Lin H, Buerki-Thurnherr T, Kaur J, Wick P, Pelin M, Tubaro A. Environmental and health impacts of graphene and other two-dimensional materials: A graphene flagship perspective. ACS Nano. 2024. 18: 6038-94

94. Lin JC. The havana syndrome and microwave weapons [Health Matters]. IEEE Microwave Magazine. 2021. 22: 13-4

95. Lin JC. The microwave auditory effect. IEEE J Electromagn RF Microwaves Med Biol. 2022. 6: 16-28

96. Lin JC. Directed-energy weapons research becomes official [Health Matters]. IEEE Microwave Magazine. 2022. 23: 13-90

97. Lin JC. Incongruities in recently revised radiofrequency exposure guidelines and standards. Environ Res. 2023. 222: 115369

98. Lowell RFBrown KWReynolds AVRattray AA. Solid-state non-lethal directed energy weapon. Available from: https://patents.google.com/patent/US7784390 [Last accessed on 2024 Feb 24].

99. Lyon RF, Gramm J, Branagan B, Houck SC. Implications of neurological directed-energy weapons for military medicine. J Spec Oper Med. 2022. 22: 104-7

100. Martinez JA. The Moscow signal epidemiological study 40 years on. Rev Environ Health. 2019. 34: 13-24

101. Martins NR, Angelica A, Chakravarthy K, Svidinenko Y, Boehm FJ, Opris I. Human brain/cloud interface. Front Neurosci. 2019. 13: 112

102. Matthew UO, Kazaure JS. Chemical polarization effects of electromagnetic field radiation from the novel 5G network deployment at ultra high frequency. Health Technol (Berl). 2021. 11: 305-17

103. Mirjanić V, Armaković S, Pelemiš SS, Armaković SJ. Investigating interactions between derivatives of graphene nanosheets and articaine for prolonged dental anesthetic effects: A multiscale modeling study. J Mol Liquids. 2024. 395: 123891

104. Nizami MZ, Takashiba S, Nishina Y. Graphene oxide: A new direction in dentistry. Appl Mater Today. 2020. 19: 100576

105. Nørgaard K, Linden-Vørnle M. Cyborgs, neuroweapons, and network command. Scand J Military Stud. 2021. 4: 94-107

106. Nyberg NR, McCredden JE, Weller SG, Hardell L. The European Union prioritises economics over health in the rollout of radiofrequency technologies. Rev Environ Health. 2022. 39: 47-64

107. Nyberg RMcCredden JHardell L. The European Union assessments of radiofrequency radiation health risks - another hard nut to crack (Review). Availabel from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37609829/.

108. Nyberg R, Nilsson M, Hardell L. Adopting scientifically invalid assumptions of no risks for deployment of the fifth generation, 5G, for wireless communication by the EU commission is harmful to human health and the environment. Ann Clin Case Rep. 2024. 9: 2572

109. Oshima N, Nishida A, Shimodera S, Tochigi M, Ando S, Yamasaki S. The suicidal feelings, self-injury, and mobile phone use after lights out in adolescents. J Pediatr Psychol. 2012. 37: 1023-30

110. Ou L, Song B, Liang H, Liu J, Feng X, Deng B. Toxicity of graphene-family nanoparticles: A general review of the origins and mechanisms. Part Fibre Toxicol. 2016. 13: 57

111. Pall ML. Microwave frequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) produce widespread neuropsychiatric effects including depression. J Chem Neuroanat. 2016. 75: 43-51

112. Pall ML. WiFi is an important threat to human health. Environ Res. 2018. 164: 405-16

113. Panagopoulos DJ. Comparing DNA damage induced by mobile telephony and other types of man-made electromagnetic fields. Mutat Res Rev Mutat Res. 2019. 781: 53-62

114. Panagopoulos DJ, Johansson O, Carlo GL. Polarization: A Key Difference between Man-made and Natural Electromagnetic Fields, in regard to Biological Activity. Sci Rep. 2015. 5: 14914

115. Panagopoulos DJ, Karabarbounis A, Yakymenko I, Chrousos GP. Human-made electromagnetic fields: Ion forced-oscillation and voltage-gated ion channel dysfunction, oxidative stress and DNA damage (Review). Int J Oncol. 2021. 59: 92

116. Peleg M, Berry EM, Deitch M, Nativ O, Richter E. On radar and radio exposure and cancer in the military setting. Environ Res. 2023. 216: 114610

117. Petrov IR. Influence of microwave radiation on the organism of man and animals, national aeronautics and space administration (NASA). Available from: https://www.orsaa.org/uploads/6/7/7/9/67791943/influence_of_microwave_radiation_on_the_organism_of_man_and_animals.pdf [Last accessed on 2024 Feb 29].

118. Qualcomm. Global 5G spectrum update and innovations for future wireless systems. Available from: https://www.qualcomm.com/content/dam/qcomm-martech/dm-assets/documents/global-5g-spectrum-status-and-innovations-for-future-wireless-systems.pdf [Last accessed on 2024 Feb 17].

119. Qin HYang YBXiangnan DXiaoshine DWang S. Preparation and application of pachyman nano adjuvant based on graphene oxide and adjuvant/antigen co-delivery vaccine. Available from: https://patents.google.com/patent/CN112089834A/en [Last accessed on 2024 Feb 25].

120. Qin TZ, Wang X, Du JZ, Lin JJ, Xue YZ, Guo L. Effects of radiofrequency field from 5G communications on the spatial memory and emotionality in mice. Int J Environ Health Res. 2024. 34: 316-27

121. Sahoo D, Mitra T, Chakraborty K, Sarkar P. Remotely controlled electro-responsive on-demand nanotherapy based on amine-modified graphene oxide for synergistic dual drug delivery. Mater Today Chem. 2022. 25: 100987

122. Song T, Gu K, Wang W, Wang H, Yang Y, Yang L. Prolonged suppression of neuropathic pain by sequential delivery of lidocaine and thalidomide drugs using PEGylated graphene oxide. J Pharm Sci. 2015. 104: 3851-60

123. Tsioliaridou A, Liaskos C, Ioannidis S, Pitsillides A, editors. CORONA: A coordinate and routing system for nanonetworks. En: Proceedings of the second annual international conference on nanoscale computing and communication. 2015. p. 1-6

124. Tupone MG, Panella G, d’Angelo M, Castelli V, Caioni G, Catanesi M. An update on graphene-based nanomaterials for neural growth and central nervous system regeneration. Int J Mol Sci. 2021. 22: 13047

125. US Air For. Directed energy futures 2060: Visions for the next 40 years of U.S. Department of defense directed energy technologies. Air force Research Laboratory. AFRL-2021-1152. 2021. p. Available from: https://defenseinnovationmarketplace.dtic.mil/2022-directed-energy-and-non-lethal-weapons https://www.afrl.af.mil/Portals/90/Documents/RD/Directed_Energy_Futures_2060_Final29June21_with_clearance_number.pdf https://pdf4pro.com/view/directed-energy-futures-2060-6ee6f0.html [Last accessed on 2024 Feb 16]

126. US Navy. MEDUSA (Mob Excess Deterrent Using Silent Audio). Available from: https://web.archive.org/web/20080409063721/http://www.navysbirprogram.com/NavySearch/Summary/summary.aspx?pk=F5B07D68-1B19-4235-B140-950CE2E19D08 [Last accessed on 2024 Feb 21].

127. Vakili B, Karami-Darehnaranji M, Mirzaei E, Hosseini F, Nezafat N. Graphene oxide as novel vaccine adjuvant. Int Immunopharmacol. 2023. 125: 111062

128. Van der Klaauw C. Cognitive warfare. Available from: https://www.jwc.nato.int/newsroom/The-Three-Swords-Magazine https://www.jwc.nato.int/application/files/2616/9782/7206/issue_39.pdf [Last accessed on 2024 Mar 03].

129. Van Scharen H. The International Commission on NonIonizing Radiation Protection: conflicts of interest, corporate capture and the push for 5G, members of the European Parliament – Michèle Rivasi (Europe Écologie) and Klaus Buchner (Ökologisch-Demokratische Partei). Available from: https://ehtrust.org/the-international-commission-on-non-ionizing-radiation-protection-conflicts-of-interest-corporate-capture-and-the-push-for-5g [Last accessed on 2024 Jan 31].

130. Verma R, Swanson RL, Parker D, Ould Ismail AA, Shinohara RT, Alappatt JA. Neuroimaging findings in US government personnel with possible exposure to directional phenomena in Havana, Cuba. JAMA. 2019. 322: 336-47

131. Wang Q, Li C, Wang Y, Que X. Phytotoxicity of graphene family nanomaterials and its mechanisms: A review. Front Chem. 2019. 7: 292

132. Weller S, McCredden JE. Understanding the public voices and researchers speaking into the 5G narrative. Front Public Health. 2024. 11: 1339513

133. Xiaoli F, Qiyue C, Weihong G, Yaqing Z, Chen H, Junrong W. Toxicology data of graphene-family nanomaterials: An update. Arch Toxicol. 2020. 94: 1915-39

134. Xu L, Xiang J, Liu Y, Xu J, Luo Y, Feng L. Functionalized graphene oxide serves as a novel vaccine nano-adjuvant for robust stimulation of cellular immunity. Nanoscale. 2016. 8: 3785-95

135. Yang K, Bi D, Deng Y, Zhang R, Rahman MM, Ali NA. A comprehensive survey on hybrid communication in context of molecular communication and terahertz communication for body-centric nanonetworks. IEEE Trans Mol Biol Multi-Scale Commun. 2020. 6: 107-33

136. Yao C, Dong J, Ren K, Sun L, Wang H, Zhang J. Accumulative effects of multifrequency microwave exposure with 1.5 GHz and 2.8 GHz on the structures and functions of the immune system. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023. 20: 4988

137. Young RO. Scanning and transmission electron microscopy reveals graphene oxide in CoV-19 vaccines. Acta Sci Med Sci. 2022. 6: 98-111

138. Yuk H, Wu J, Zhao X. Hydrogel interfaces for merging humans and machines. Nat Rev Mater. 2022. 7: 935-52

139. Zhang X, Ma Z, Zheng H, Li T, Chen K, Wang X. The combination of brain-computer interfaces and artificial intelligence: applications and challenges. Ann Transl Med. 2020. 8: 712

140. Zhou Q, Gu H, Sun S, Zhang Y, Hou Y, Li C. Large-sized graphene oxide nanosheets increase DC-T-cell synaptic contact and the efficacy of DC vaccines against SARS-CoV-2. Adv Mater. 2021. 33: e2102528