- Department of Neurosurgery, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
Correspondence Address:
Rossana Romani
Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
DOI:10.4103/2152-7806.90029
Copyright: © 2011 Romani R. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.How to cite this article: Romani R, Silvasti-Lundell M, Laakso A, Tuominen H, Hernesniemi J, Niemi T. Slack brain in meningioma surgery through lateral supraorbital approach. Surg Neurol Int 19-Nov-2011;2:167
How to cite this URL: Romani R, Silvasti-Lundell M, Laakso A, Tuominen H, Hernesniemi J, Niemi T. Slack brain in meningioma surgery through lateral supraorbital approach. Surg Neurol Int 19-Nov-2011;2:167. Available from: http://sni.wpengine.com/surgicalint_articles/slack-brain-in-meningioma-surgery-through-lateral-supraorbital-approach/
Abstract
Background:Surgery of skull base meningiomas by the lateral supraorbital (LSO) approach requires relaxed brain. Therefore, we assessed combined effects of the elements of neuroanesthesia on neurosurgical conditions during craniotomy.
Methods:The anesthesiological and surgical charts of 66 olfactory groove, 73 anterior clinoidal, and 52 tuberculum sellae meningioma patients operated on by the senior author (J.H.) at the Department of Neurosurgery of Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland, between September 1997 and August 2010, were retrospectively analyzed.
Results:One-hundred fifty-four (82%) patients had good surgical conditions, and this was achieved by (1) elevating the head 20 cm above the cardiac level in all patients with only slightly lateral turn or neck flexion, (2) administering mannitol preoperatively in medium or large meningiomas (n = 60), (3) maintaining anesthesia with propofol infusion (n = 46) or volatile anesthetics (n = 107) also in patients with large tumors (n = 37), and (4) controlling intraoperative hemodynamics. Brain relaxation was satisfactory in 18 (10%) and poor in 15 (8%) patients. The median intraoperative blood loss was 200 (range, 0-2000) ml. Only 9% of patients received red blood cell transfusion. The median time to extubation was 18 (range, 8-105) min after surgery. Extubation time correlated with the patients’ preoperative clinical status and the size of tumor but not with the modality of anesthesia.
Conclusions:Slack brain during the LSO approach is achieved by correct patient positioning, preoperative mannitol, either by propofol or in small tumors inhaled anesthetics, and optimizing cerebral perfusion pressure. Under these circumstances, intraoperative brain swelling is prevented, bleeding is minimal, and no blood transfusions are needed.
Keywords: Anesthesia, bleeding, lateral supraorbital approach, position, slack brain
INTRODUCTION
A slack brain is necessary when treating vascular or neoplastic lesions through the small lateral supraorbital approach (LSO). This approach, used by the senior author (J.H.) for the past 25 years, enables surgery of vascular or neoplastic lesions of the anterior skull base.[
The patient positioning, selection of optimal method of anesthesia, and osmotherapy given well in advance before the opening of dura are essential in brain tumor patients undergoing craniotomy. In neurosurgical procedures, volatile anesthetics or propofol are frequently used to maintain general anesthesia.[
In the present study we reviewed the principles of neuroanesthesia when treating 191 anterior skull base meningiomas through the small LSO approach. The aim was to identify the clinically relevant perioperative factors providing good surgical conditions when treating these lesions through this approach. The senior author (J.H.) operated on all patients at the Department of Neurosurgery of Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland, between September 1997 and August 2010.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Patient selection and radiological findings
Between September 1997 and August 2010, a total of 191 patients underwent anterior skull base meningioma removal through the LSO approach by the senior author (J.H.) at the Department of Neurosurgery, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland. Patients operated on by other neurosurgeons were excluded. The patients had 66 olfactory groove meningiomas (OGMs), 73 anterior clinoidal meningiomas (ACMs), and 52 tuberculum sellae meningiomas (TSMs). The demographic data of these patients are listed in
Anesthesiological records
Data collection included duration of anesthesia and surgery, anesthetic agents and their doses, total amount of administered vasoactive agents (phenylephrine, ephedrine, dopamine, or atropine), the total amount of administered crystalloids (Ringer's acetate), colloids [hydroxyethyl starch solution, (HES) or albumin)], mannitol, red blood cell concentrates, fresh frozen plasma (FFP), and platelet concentrates. Heart rate and noninvasive blood pressure were registered before anesthesia. Intraoperatively invasive arterial blood pressures (arterial transducer set zero at the level of foramen of Monro) were registered at 5-min intervals for 40 min and thereafter at 10-min intervals until the end of surgery. Hypertension (systolic arterial pressure > 160 mmHg) was registered during the immediate postoperative phase. The evaluation of the surgical conditions during craniotomy was based on surgical charts written by the senior author (J.H.) who always mentions whether there is a slack brain (classified as good neurosurgical conditions), or if opening of the basal cisterns is needed to achieve a slack brain (classified as satisfactory), or if there is brain swelling (classified as poor neurosurgical conditions). The patients’ preoperative medical comorbidities such as hypertension and the use of any medication were registered.
Statistics
The statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 17.0 software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Groups were compared using Mann–Whitney U test, Kruskall–Wallis test, or Pearson's χ2test. P values less than 0.05 were considered significant. Univariate and multivariate odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals were estimated using unconditional logistic regression for determining factors predicting good neurosurgical conditions and extubation time. The tested variables included age, preoperative Karnofsky score, peritumoral edema, size of meningiomas, and method of anesthesia. The maximum likelihood stepwise forward and backward elimination procedures were used with the selection of variables based on the magnitude of their probability values (<0.1). A two-tailed probability value less than 0.05 was considered significant.
RESULTS
The surgical data of 191 patients were included, whereas complete anesthesiological records of 187 patients were available for data analyses. Anesthesiological charts were not available for 2 patients with OGMs and 2 patients with ACMs.
Brain relaxation and anesthesia
Brain relaxation was good in 154 (82%) patients. In 18 patients the brain relaxation was classified as satisfactory (10%) and the optimal slack brain was achieved by opening the basal cisterns during the surgery. In 15 (8%) patients the brain was swelling intraoperatively. Thirteen of these patients had large tumors (P < 0.001). Their median Karnofsky score was 80 (range, 50–90) and 14 of them had peritumoral edema. Nine patients out of 15 with brain swelling had either sevoflurane (n = 6) or isoflurane (n = 3) anesthesia. In multivariate analysis the swelling of the brain was associated with medium-to-large-sized meningiomas, peritumoral edema, volatile or combined anesthesia, and poor preoperative clinical condition (Karnofsky score < 70) (P < 0.001).
Patient positioning
The patients were in the supine position for the LSO approach [
Induction of anesthesia
The method of anesthesia is summarized in
Maintenance of anesthesia and tumor size
Anesthesia was maintained by propofol infusion (n = 46, 25%), sevoflurane (n = 74, 40%) or isoflurane (n = 33, 17%), or a combination of propofol infusion and sevoflurane/isoflurane (n = 34, 18%) [
The meningioma size was medium or large in 21 patients receiving propofol anesthesia. Only 4 patients anesthetized with propofol had a small meningioma. Twenty-four patients anesthetized with propofol presented with peritumoral edema.
Thirty-seven patients with large meningioma, 45 with medium and 25 with small meningioma received either sevoflurane or isoflurane anesthesia and 40 of them (10 medium and 30 large-sized meningiomas) presented with peritumoral edema. In univariate analysis there was no correlation between the size of tumor and the method of anesthesia.
Remifentanil infusion was administered to 166 (89%) patients. Remifentanil infusion was combined with sevoflurane/isoflurane in 91 (49%) patients, or with propofol in 41 (22%) patients.
Neuromuscular block was achieved by nondepolarizing muscle relaxants (rocuronium or vecuronium) in all the study patients.
Ventilation and blood gas analyses
Mean (SD) arterial CO2 tension (PaCO2) (n = 44) and oxygen tension (PaO2) (n = 46) were 4.6 (±0.5) kPa and 23.3 (±10.7) kPa in patients having propofol anesthesia (n = 46; n = 48 blood gas analyses), respectively. The corresponding findings of PaCO2 (n = 105) and PaO2 (n = 107) were 4.6 (±0.5) kPa and 23.6 (±9.0) kPa in patients having either sevoflurane or isoflurane anesthesia. PaCO2 and PaO2in the 15 patients with inhaled anesthetics and intraoperative brain swelling were 4.4 (±0.5) and 28.4 (±17.7), respectively. The acid-base equilibrium, i.e., pH and base excess (BE) , remained within normal laboratory reference range in all the analyses (n = 175). The median (25th/75th percentiles) body temperature was 36.2°C (35.9/36.7).
Intravenous fluids and osmotic agents
The administered intravenous fluids are listed in
The administration of 15% mannitol according to the size of the meningioma is shown in
Intraoperative bleeding and blood transfusion
The median (range) cumulative intraoperative blood loss was 200 (range, 0-2000) ml. Blood loss was significantly associated with the tumor size (P < 0.05). Two patients had blood loss above 1500 ml. One of them had intraoperative blood loss of 1800 ml because of accidental laceration of the internal carotid artery (ICA) during the removal of a small ACM with an intraorbital and intracavernous component. The laceration was repaired with microsuture.[
Hemodynamics, vasoactive, and antiepileptic drugs
The systolic and diastolic arterial pressures and heart rate are shown in
Antiepileptic drugs were given to 104 patients perioperatively. The drugs were fosphenytoin (95 cases), carbamazepine (6 cases), phenytoin (2 cases), and lorazepam (1 case). The administration of antiepileptic drugs was not related to the location of tumors but to the size of meningiomas (P < 0.05).
Duration of surgery and extubation time
The median (range) duration of surgery, skin to skin, was 115 (35–442) min [
Most of the patients (n = 157/84%) were extubated on the day of the surgery. The median time to extubation after surgery was 18 (range, 8-105) min. Fifty-three (28%) of the patients were extubated within 10 min after the completion of surgery (14 small-, 33 medium-, and 6 large-sized meningiomas). Forty-five (24%) patients were extubated within 30 min after surgery (13 small, 24 medium-, and 8 large-sized meningiomas). Fifty-nine (32%) patients were extubated either within 1 h (10 cases), 5 h (36 cases), or later than 5 h after the completion of surgery but the same day of the surgery (13 cases).
Twenty-nine patients were extubated during the following days after surgery: on the first postoperative day (21 cases), on the second postoperative day (3 cases), on the third postoperative day (1 case), on the fourth postoperative day (2 cases), or on the fifth and sixth postoperative days (1 case each). In univariate and multivariate analyses, preoperative clinical status (Karnofsky score < 70) (P < 0.001), size and location (OGM) of the tumor (P < 0.001), peritumoral edema (P < 0.001), and brain swelling at surgery (P < 0.05) were predicting factors for prolonged extubation time after surgery (days after surgery).
An immediate postoperative neuroradiological control was performed in 125 patients (117 CT scan and 8 MRI). Two patients (1 OGM and 1 ACM) had a postoperative hematoma requiring surgical evacuation. No other patients who underwent immediate postoperative radiological control presented signs of increased ICP or an increase of preoperative edema. The median (range) of early Karnofsky score was 80 (30–100).
DISCUSSION
We studied the concept of neuroanesthesia enabling successful neurosurgery of 187 meningioma patients with the LSO approach and found that the combined effect of optimal patient positioning, method of anesthesia, osmotherapy, and adequate CPP creates good conditions for craniotomy. The neurosurgical operative conditions were good in 154 (82%) of the patients, satisfactory in 18 (10%) and poor in 15 (8%) patients during craniotomy. Two patients had unexceptionally high intraoperative blood loss due to an accidental ICA lesion or a very vascularized tumor. Otherwise the blood loss was minimal and the frequency of red blood cell transfusions was low. These findings confirm that the LSO approach with the bone flap of about 4 cm in diameter is an atraumatic approach.[
Patient position
A 30° head elevation decreases ICP in patients undergoing craniotomy. Head and neck position needs to be adjusted as neutral as possible to enable free venous return during craniotomy. A 100% increase in ICP is possible when head is tilted extremely to the right or left with simultaneous neck flexion.[
Anesthetic agent selection
The second option to maximize brain relaxation during craniotomy is to manipulate intracranial arterial blood volume by optimizing CBF and CPP. CBF is regulated by physiological pressure-flow autoregulation, ventilation (CO2 reactivity), and the method of anesthesia.
Since the function of cerebral flow-pressure autoregulation cannot be assessed during routine anesthesia for tumor patients, the possibility of the abnormal relationship between CBF and CPP is highly relevant. Thus, in the patients of the present study, the CPP was optimized according to the systemic blood pressure measurement with the arterial transducer set zero at the level of foramen of Monro. The safe lower limit of CPP was determined individually by assessing the overall hemodynamic profile. In the present study, the systolic blood pressure varied on average between 95 and 110 mmHg providing CPP of above 60 mmHg. The targeted CPP was achieved by the use of relatively small doses of vasoactive drugs, without excessive intravenous fluid administration. During removal of a brain tumor, it is also essential to avoid peak increases in systolic arterial blood pressure to avoid bleeding. The clinical assessment of CPP was optimal in all the patients since the blood loss was minimal intraoperatively and none of the patients had ischemic brain lesions postoperatively.
Hemodynamical stability is achieved by an adequate depth of anesthesia and analgesia during craniotomy. The effect of the initial bolus of fentanyl (5–7 μg/kg), following infusion of remifentanil, blunts the sympathetic activity. In the present study, inhaled anesthetics were used in patients with all tumor sizes. Our observations confirm the results of previous studies showing that inhaled anesthetics or propofol are suitable in patients undergoing resection of a brain tumor.[
Osmotic agent
The administration of mannitol before opening of the dura also optimized brain relaxation regardless of the method of anesthesia. It is notable that patients who received mannitol had a large tumor or brain edema. The routine use of mannitol is not indicated since mannitol may induce unfavorable side effects, such as disturbances in electrolyte concentrations, renal dysfunction, or coagulation disorders.[
Blood loss
Careful microsurgical technique, optimal brain relaxation, and cerebral hemodynamics all minimize blood loss during surgery of brain tumors. Furthermore, the duration of surgery was short, even in patients with a large tumor. Indeed, the intraoperative blood loss was on average only 200 ml and very few of the patients received a red blood cell transfusion. The blood loss in the present study is much less (80%) than that previously reported.[
CONCLUSIONS
The LSO approach requires good operative site conditions and brain relaxation. This is achieved by a correct patient positioning and optimal neuroanesthesia. In small- or medium-sized meningiomas, both intravenous and volatile anesthesia can result in a slack brain. In large meningiomas, we prefer propofol anesthesia and mannitol. Early devascularization of the tumor and good control of intraoperative hemodynamics reduce the intraoperative bleeding.
References
1. Burnstein R, Gupta AK, Gelb AW.editors. Anesthesia for Supratentorial Surgery. Essentials of Neuroanesthesia and Neurointensive Care. China: Saunders, Elsevier; 2008. p. 106-10
2. Hernesniemi J. Mechanisms to improve treatment standards in neurosurgery, cerebral aneurysm surgery as example. Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2001. 78: 127-34
3. Hernesniemi J, Romani R, Niemelä M. Skull base and aneurysm surgery. Surg Neurol. 2009. 71: 30-1
4. Hernesniemi J, Ishii K, Niemelä M, Smrcka M, Kivipelto L, Fujiki M. Lateral supraorbital approach as an alternative to the classical pterional approach. Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2005. 94: 17-21
5. Hernesniemi J, Dashti R, Lehecka M, Niemelä M, Rinne J, Lehto H. Microneurosurgical management of anterior communicating artery aneurysms. Surg Neurol. 2008. 70: 8-28
6. Hernesniemi J, Niemelä M, Karatas A, Kivipelto L, Ishii K, Rinne J. Some collected principles of microneurosurgery: Simple and fast, while preserving normal anatomy: A review. Surg Neurol. 2005. 64: 195-200
7. Hernesniemi J, Niemelä M, Dashti R, Karatas A, Kivipelto L, Ishii K. Principles of microneurosurgery for safe and fast surgery. Surg Technol Int. 2006. 15: 305-10
8. Karnofsky DA, Burchenal J, MacLeod CM.editors. The clinical evaluation of chemotherapeutic Agents in Cancer. Evaluation of Chemotherapeutic Agents. New York: Columbia University Press; 1949. p. 191-205
9. Lauta E, Abbinante C, Del Gaudio A, Aloj F, Fanelli M, de Vivo P. Emergence times are similar with sevoflurane and total intravenous anesthesia: Results of a multicenter RCT of patients scheduled for elective supratentorial craniotomy. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2010. 22: 110-8
10. Lindroos AC, Niiya T, Randell T, Romani R, Hernesniemi J, Niemi T. Sitting position for removal of pineal region lesions: The Helsinki experience. World Neurosurg. 2010. 74: 505-13
11. Luostarinen T, Niiya T, Schramko A, Rosenberg P, Niemi T. Comparison of hypertonic saline and mannitol on whole blood coagulation in vitro assessed by thromboelastometry. Neurocrit Care. 2011. 14: 238-243
12. Mavrocordatos P, Bissonnette B, Ravussin P. Effects of neck position and head elevation on intracranial pressure in anaesthetized neurosurgical patients: Preliminary results. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2000. 12: 10-4
13. Palmer JD, Francis JL, Pickard JD, Iannotti F. The efficacy and safety of aprotinin for hemostasis during intracranial surgery. J Neurosurg. 2003. 98: 1208-16
14. Randell T, Niemelä M, Kyttä J, Tanskanen P, Määttänen M, Karatas A. Principles of neuroanesthesia in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: The Helsinki experience. Surg Neurol. 2006. 66: 382-8
15. Romani R, Lehecka M, Gaal E, Toninelli S, Celik Ö, Niemelä M. Lateral supraorbital approach applied to olfactory groove meningiomas: Experience with 66 consecutive patients. Neurosurgery. 2009. 65: 39-
16. Romani R, Laakso A, Kangasniemi M, Lehecka M, Hernesniemi J. Lateral supraorbital approach applied to anterior clinoidal meningiomas: Experience with 73 consecutive patients. Neurosurgery. 2011. 68: 1632-47
17. Talke P, Caldwell JE, Brown R, Dodson B, Howley J, Richardson CA. A comparison of three anesthetic techniques in patients undergoing craniotomy for supratentorial intracranial surgery. Anesth Analg. 2002. 95: 430-5
18. Tanskanen PE, Kyttä JV, Randell TT, Aantaa RE. Dexmedetomidine as an anaesthetic adjuvant in patients undergoing intracranial tumour surgery: A double-blind, randomized and placebo-controlled study. Br J Anaesth. 2006. 97: 658-65