Abstract

Background: Urachal carcinoma (UC) is a rare variant of bladder carcinoma. Only seven cases of brain metastasis from UC have been reported in the literature thus far.

Case Description: A 77-year-old female was diagnosed with a brain tumor in her left cerebellum 2 years after she underwent surgery for a primary UC in the bladder. Surgery was performed via a midline suboccipital approach and the tumor was totally removed. The excised lesion was pathologically diagnosed as a metastasis and displayed typical pathological features of urachal adenocarcinoma with abundant mucin mixed with signet ring cells. A recurrence was observed at the site of tumor removal 6 months after surgery, and then, gamma knife radiotherapy was performed to the lesion.

Conclusion: According to the five previously reported similar cases and our case, tumor removal is the treatment of choice. Routine whole brain radiotherapy is not the best treatment choice; however, local radiotherapy including conventional local radiotherapy or gamma knife radiotherapy could be implemented instead.

Keywords: Brain metastasis, Radiotherapy, Urachal carcinoma

INTRODUCTION

Urachal carcinoma (UC) is a rare urological tumor, accounting for 0.17–0.34% of all bladder carcinomas.[ 13 ] The incidence of bladder carcinoma is 6.7/100,000 people, whereas the incidence of all types of cancer is 237.4/100,000 people.[ 6 ] Therefore, brain metastases from UC are extremely rare in neurosurgical practice, and only seven cases have been reported in the literature.[ 1 , 5 , 8 , 9 , 11 , 14 , 15 ] Bladder carcinoma itself is one of the common cancer types. Established risk factors include male sex, white race, cigarette smoking, and exposure to certain chemicals.[ 4 ] The most common clinical presentation is asymptomatic hematuria.[ 4 ] To assess for bladder cancer, patients can be evaluated by cystoscopy, renal function testing, and upper urinary tract imaging.[ 4 ] Transurethral resection of the bladder allows for definitive diagnosis.[ 4 ] Nonmuscle- invasive disease is treated with transurethral resection, while muscle-invasive disease is typically treated with radical cystectomy and neoadjuvant chemotherapy.[ 4 ] Survival rates vary for different tumor stages, with the five-year survival rate ranging from 96% for carcinoma in situ to 5% for distant metastasis.[ 4 ] UC is believed to originate from an urachal remnant that undergoes intestinal metaplasia or it might be derived from progenitor cells of the cloaca left behind during embryologic development.[ 2 ] Histologically, the majority of UCs are adenocarcinomas arising from the bladder. Here, we present such a case of a cerebellar metastasis from UC of the bladder.

CASE REPORT

A 77-year-old female had been diagnosed with UC and had undergone total cystectomy 2 years prior to presentation with dizziness for which she was referred to our department. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed a 35-mm sized lesion in the left cerebellum. This lesion showed low intensity on T1-weighted images, high intensity with perifocal edema on T2-weighted images, and avid heterogeneous enhancement on T1-weighted images after gadolinium administration [ Figure 1 ]. The differential diagnosis included metastasis, glioma, and abscess. Surgery was performed using a standard midline suboccipital approach with the patient in the prone position under general anesthesia. The tumor was totally removed and postoperative course was uneventful. The excised specimen was pathologically diagnosed as mucinous adenocarcinoma consisting mainly of proliferating signet ring cells, which was identical to the features seen in the primary urachal adenocarcinoma comprised a mixture of signet ring cells, mucus-producing cells, and duct-forming cells [ Figure 2 ]. This tumor was pathologically, therefore, diagnosed as cerebellar metastasis of the UC. Recurrence was observed at the site of tumor removal 6 months after surgery, and subsequently, gamma knife radiotherapy was performed to remove the lesion.

Figure 1:

Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging showing a 35-mm sized mass in the left cerebellum that showed low intensity on T1-weighted image (left), high intensity with perifocal oedema on T2-weighted image (middle), and heterogeneous enhancement on T1-weighted image with gadolinium administration (right).

Figure 2:

Tumour containing proliferating signet ring cells floating in abundant mucin.

DISCUSSION

UC is a rare variant of bladder carcinoma which differs from normal bladder carcinoma in several ways: Instead of arising from the urothelium, it is believed to originate from an urachal remnant that underwent intestinal metaplasia or from progenitor cells of the cloaca left behind during embryologic development. This theory is reflected in the pathohistological differences observed between these two cancer types.[ 2 ] UC normally exhibits features of adenocarcinoma and often contains ductal cells, mucus-producing cells, and signet ring cells, mimicking features of gastrointestinal cancers.[ 2 ] In this case, pathology was typical of UC developing a metastasis to the brain.

Generally speaking, UC is treated in a way comparable to normal bladder carcinoma. Surgery is the treatment of choice, whereas chemotherapy and radiotherapy can be chosen for advanced cases. In cases with infiltration of adjacent organs or with distant or lymph node metastasis, poor prognosis is expected; the 5-year survival rate is believed to be 20% or less.[ 3 , 12 ] The treatment modalities include surgery, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and a combination of these.

As of now, seven cases of brain metastasis from UC have been reported.[ 1 , 5 , 8 , 9 , 11 , 14 , 15 ] Five of these are published in English or Japanese and include detailed discussions regarding brain metastasis [ Table 1 ].[ 5 , 8 , 9 , 14 , 15 ] Except in one reported patient, tumor removal was performed in all cases.[ 15 ] Adjuvant radiotherapy was provided in four of the cases, one of which employed gamma knife treatment.[ 9 ] Chemotherapy for brain lesions was not performed for any of these cases because it was not thought to cure brain metastasis.[ 10 ] Prognosis was poor, with the survival time ranging from 1 to 18 months. Hirshman et al. reported that the cumulative volume of metastasis to the CNS is considered a predictive factor associated with treatment response and survival rate in patients with CNS metastasis.[ 7 ] The cases in the current report tended to follow this theory. Among them, only one patient died of the brain lesion,[ 5 ] whereas the others died due to progression of the primary lesion or other metastases.

Table 1:

Summary of the patients with brain metastasis from urachal carcinoma.

According to the five cases and our own case, the efficacy of radiotherapy remains unclear. Whole brain radiotherapy was provided in one case for multiple lesions, but there was no effect on tumor size.[ 15 ] Postoperative conventional local radiotherapy was performed in two cases; these cases showed no local recurrence.[ 5 , 8 ] Two cases, including our case, did not involve postoperative conventional local radiotherapy; both of the cases showed local recurrence 3 and 6 months after surgery.[ 9 ] Gamma knife was used for treating multiple lesions in one case; later, the lesions disappeared on contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.[ 9 ] We also administered gamma knife radiotherapy to cure the local recurrence in the cerebellum at the site of tumor removal. We are currently observing the patients to evaluate the treatment effects. It seems that local radiation including conventional local radiotherapy and gamma knife is more effective, whereas routine whole brain radiation does not seem to be the best choice for this carcinoma, considering the later complications.

CONCLUSION

We reported a rare case of brain metastasis from urachal carcinoma. According to the five previously reported similar cases and our case, tumor removal is the treatment of choice. Routine whole brain radiotherapy is not the best treatment choice; however, local radiotherapy including conventional local radiotherapy or gamma knife radiotherapy could be implemented instead.

Declaration of patient consent

The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form, the patient has given his consent for his images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patient understands that her name and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal their identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

References

1. Arakawa Y, Inoue D, Sakuyama T, Nagasaki E, Aiba K. Strontium-89 therapy and subarachnoid phenol block successfully eliminated intractable pain of metastasis in the patient with advanced urachal carcinoma. Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 2011. 38: 59-60

2. Behrendt MA, van Rhijn BW. Genetics and biological markers in urachal cancer. Transl Androl Urol. 2016. 5: 655-61

3. Bruins HM, Visser O, Ploeg M, Hulsbergen-van de Kaa CA, Kiemeney LA, Witjes JA. The clinical epidemiology of urachal carcinoma: Results of a large, population based study. J Urol. 2012. 188: 1102-7

4. DeGeorge KC, Holt HR, Hodges SC. Bladder cancer: Diagnosis and treatment. Am Fam Phys. 2017. 96: 507-14

5. Fujiwara S, Takaki T, Hikita T, Kanzaki H, Kuroiwa S. Brain metastasis from urachal carcinoma. Surg Neurol. 1988. 29: 475-6

6. Global Burden of Disease Cancer Collaboration, Fitzmaurice C, Dicker D, Pain A, Hamavid H, Moradi-Lakeh M. The global burden of cancer 2013. JAMA Oncol. 2015. 1: 505-27

7. Hirshman BR, Wilson B, Ali MA, Proudfoot JA, Koiso T, Nagano O. Superior prognostic value of cumulative intracranial tumor volume relative to largest intracranial tumor volume for stereotactic radiosurgery-treated brain metastasis patients. Neurosurgery. 2018. 82: 473-80

8. Idei M, Urasaki E, Yokota A. Metastatic brain tumor originating from urachal carcinoma: Case report. No Shinkei Geka. 2005. 33: 1015-9

9. Kaido T, Uemura H, Hirao Y, Uranishi R, Nishi N, Sakaki T. Brain metastases from urachal carcinoma. J Clin Neurosci. 2003. 10: 703-5

10. Lin X, DeAngelis LM. Treatment of brain metastases. J Clin Oncol. 2015. 33: 3475-84

11. Moreno AJ, Rebollo CG, Calle FA, Villa LP, Carrillo JJ, Villalta EJ. Urachal adenocarcinoma with late brain metastases. Arch Esp Urol. 2010. 63: 550-4

12. Mylonas KS, O Malley P, Ziogas IA, El-Kabab L, Nasioudis D. Malignant urachal neoplasms: A population-based study and systematic review of literature. Urol Oncol. 2017. 35: 33-3

13. Sheldon CA, Clayman RV, Gonzalez R, Williams RD, Fraley EE. Malignant urachal lesions. J Urol. 1984. 131: 1-8

14. Taussky D, Karakiewicz PI, Latour M, Blais N. Brain metastasis from urachal carcinoma: The importance of locally aggressive treatment. Rare Tumors. 2012. 4: e17-

15. Tewari MK, Khosla VK, Sharma BS, Vashistha RK, Khandelwal NK, Kak VK. Brain metastasis from urachal carcinoma: Case report. Surg Neurol. 1994. 42: 340-2