- Department of Neurological Surgery, University College Hospital, UCH, Ibadan, Nigeria
Correspondence Address:
A. Olufemi Adeleye
Department of Neurological Surgery, University College Hospital, UCH, Ibadan, Nigeria
DOI:10.4103/2152-7806.86227
Copyright: © 2011 Adeleye AO. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.How to cite this article: Adeleye AO, Azeez AL. Decompressive craniectomy bone flap hinged on the temporalis muscle: A new inexpensive use for an old neurosurgical technique. Surg Neurol Int 18-Oct-2011;2:150
How to cite this URL: Adeleye AO, Azeez AL. Decompressive craniectomy bone flap hinged on the temporalis muscle: A new inexpensive use for an old neurosurgical technique. Surg Neurol Int 18-Oct-2011;2:150. Available from: http://sni.wpengine.com/surgicalint_articles/decompressive-craniectomy-bone-flap-hinged-on-the-temporalis-muscle-a-new-inexpensive-use-for-an-old-neurosurgical-technique/
Abstract
Background:The neurosurgical procedure of hinge decompressive craniectomy (hDC), or hinge craniotomy (HC), as described from units in the advanced countries makes use of metallic implants, usually titanium plates and screws, which may not be economically viable in resource-limited practice settings.
Methods:We describe our surgical techniques for performing this same procedure of hDC in a developing country using the patient's own temporalis muscle instead of any other potentially costly implants.
Results:The technique as described appears to be successful in achieving intracranial decompression in cases of traumatic brain swelling in which it has been used. Clinical and radiological illustrations of the feasibility, and practical utility, of the procedures in four clinical scenarios of traumatic brain injury are presented. Like all other techniques of HC, this new surgical technique of hDC temporalis saves the survivors the added imperative of future cranioplasty of the usual postcraniectomy skull defect. Unlike the others, the procedure eliminates the added cost of the metallic implants needed to perform the former techniques.
Conclusions:The procedure of hDC temporalis appears to be a viable option for performing the surgical procedure of HC and has added cost-cutting economic benefits for resource-limited practice settings.
Keywords: Decompressive craniectomy, developing countries, hinge craniotomy, hinge decompressive craniectomy, Nigeria, temporalis muscle, traumatic brain injury
INTRODUCTION
The possible place of decompressive craniectomy (DC) in the neurosurgical management of traumatic brain injuries (TBI) in the developing countries recently attracted our interest.[
MATERIALS AND METHODS
First and foremost, we present a clinical case-based illustration of our surgical technique for the performance of “hDC temporalis” that is in situ hDC using the temporalis muscle; and then, the summary of some salient pre- and postoperative clinical/radiological points of note in three other cases treated using this technique.
Surgical technique of in situ hinge DC using the temporalis muscle
This initial report is for a unilateral frontal-temporal-parietal hDC; the technique however appears to also be very feasible for a synchronous bilateral procedure.
Clinical /surgical illustration
A 44-year-old man presented in our unit with moderate head injury (HI) 1 day after road accident out of state. On examination he had depressed consciousness, Glasgow coma score (GCS) of 11/15: E4V2M5; equal, 3 mm, reactive pupils; left facial and hemibody limb weakness, and fairly stable vital signs: temperature 38.0°C, pulse 68/min, respiratory rate 24/min, and blood pressure 170/90 mmHg. Cranial CT obtained on the day of trauma showed a right frontotemporoparietal (FTP) cortical brain contusion, slight brain swelling and focal areas of subarachnoid hemorrhage [
Figure 1
The procedure of HC using the temporalis muscle, cranial CT films of the illustrated surgical case (a) axial brain images at presentation showing the non-surgical multifocal bilateral brain contusions worse on the right and only slight cerebral swelling with no gross mass effect; (b) axial brain images of the same patient when he deteriorated clinically 7 days later. There is diffuse brain swelling worse to the right associated with effacement of the ventricles and basal cisterns, and a midline shift; (c) axial brain images on POD 6 show evidence of mobility and elevation of the free bone flap, measurable extracranial brain expansion, and reversal of the intraaxial mass effect
Surgical procedure
Positioned supine with left lateral rotation of the head under general endotracheal anesthesia a right FTP large trauma scalp flap was raised. Next, anterior and posterior vertical cuts were made with Bovie on the respective borders of the temporalis muscle and the same elevated off the temporal squama only at the temporal fossa floor [
Figure 2
Illustrations for the surgical technique of HC utilizing the temporalis muscle, the hDC temporalis. (a) A large right-sided FTP osteoplastic cranial bone flap is being raised pedicled on the temporalis muscle; (b) completion craniectomy down to the middle fossa floor; (c) the tense, dusky dural brain covering is opened revealing the much swollen and contused brain; (d) after adequate debridement of the brain contusion a loose expansile dural closure is done; and (e) the bone flap is returned in situ on a hinge of its own temporalis muscle. Although the vertical cuts in the latter have been sutured back, the bone flap remains spontaneously mobile and is seen floating over the still swollen brain; (f) is an inset from another case further illustrating the great mobility of the hinged bone flap (g) water tight skin closure
The patient made progressive clinical improvement: was extubated in the ICU on POD 4; the scalp swelling progressively regressed, the bone flap spontaneously settling back in place; the wound healed by primary intention and the wound staples/stitches were removed on the POD 12. The patient was discharged home 6 weeks post-op fully conscious and at approximate lower moderate deficit status on the extended Glasgow outcome scale (GOSE). He sustained this neurological improvement and was already at the level of GOSE lower normal at the last outpatient review 10 months post-op. He displayed no concerning issues regarding his bone flap site. The latter had actually settled down back in place.
RESULTS
Some aspects of the clinical and radiological course of three other patients managed with this surgical technique are here presented to further illustrate some of its other nuances.
A 34-year-old young man presented with moderate TBI, GCS 11, from a pedestrian motor vehicle accident (MVA). Cranial CT obtained 2 days post-trauma (logistic delay) revealed an acute extradural haematoma (EDH) under a right temporoparietal linear skull fracture and diffuse brain swelling worse on the left side with multifocal haemorrhagic contusions. Marked intracranial pressure effects were evidenced by effacement of all the CSF spaces in the ventricles and the basal cisterns, and a left--right midline shift [ Another 35-year-old young man presented with mild TBI, GCS 13/15, following a driver MVA. By a highly fortuitous coincidence 3 days after admission his neurological condition worsened to GCS 9/15 and the earlier requested but delayed cranial CT scanning was also obtained about the same time. This revealed an ASDH of the left FTP region with ipsilateral brain swelling and mass effect [ A 33-year-old woman presented with severe TBI, GCS 8/15, and anisocoria. Cranial CT showed diffuse severe brain swelling worse on the left side which also revealed evidence of brain contusion, traumatic SAH, and ASDH [
Figure 3
The cranial CT of case illustration A. (a) Axial images showing the significant brain injuries including bilateral multifocal haemorrhagic contusions, traumatic SAH, right parietal EDH and diffuse brain swelling with marked mass effect worse on the left (b-d) brain images 3 days following hDC temporalis showing good mobility of the bone flap and good extracranial cerebral expansion resulting in a positive reversal of the intracranial intraaxial mass effect. The ventricular space realignment is also evident; (e) clinical photograph of this patient at 12 months post-op. The bone flap is well settled in place; and it here presents no apparent evidence of impending inanition
Figure 4
The clinical illustration B. (a) Axial cranial CT images showing the left-sided ASDH, significant ipsilateral brain swelling and mass effect; (b) the patient at the outpatient visit 3 months post-op. The bone flap is already spontaneously returned on-site obviating any need for subsequent cranioplasty
Figure 5
The clinical illustration C, severe HI following MVA. (a) Axial cranial CT films showing left ASDH and traumatic SAH; there is diffuse severe brain swelling with significant mass effect (b) plain skull X-ray images on POD 2 showing good bone flap mobility (c) axial brain and bone CT imaging 6 months post-op showing resolution of the intracranial intraaxial brain inflammatory changes. More particularly, the bone flap is seen here spontaneously sitting snugly back in place
DISCUSSION
We have presented here a technical case series illustrating some aspects of a technique of hinge decompressive craniectomy (hDC), or hinge craniotomy (HC), which has potentials, using our technique, for great utility in resource limited practice environments of many LMIC. In this technique, the hDC temporalis, the surgical procedure of HC is performed exactly as described by earlier workers but here the hinge used to achieve mobile cranial-decompressing storage of the skull flap in situ is the native temporalis muscle and not some other metallic implants.
The place of decompressive craniectomy, in the resource limited areas of the developing countries, as a damage control brain surgery[
We have therefore recently begun to investigate the place of DC, even prophylactic DC, in our practice.[
Surgical decompressive craniectomy
The current gold standard technique of DC compels each patient to have at least two major surgical and general anesthetic encounters.[
In situ hinge craniotomies
In the year 2007, the technique of HC was reported by three different independent working groups.[
The surgical paradigms of the foregoing techniques of HC led us to the intuitive evolution of the technique here presented, the hDC temporalis. Here the native temporalis muscle is the hinge allowing the mobile retention, in situ, of the cranial bone flap. It is not a new neurosurgical invention per se but essentially a surgical technique based on the same old one of Wagner's and Cushing's;[
Limitations of the technique of hDC temporalis
There are a few possible limitations of this technique that readily come to mind. One is the possibility of wound complications, including breakdowns and CSF leak, under such possible wound tension. This has not been a major experience for us but it is well worth keeping this in mind by close attention to details to ensure a water tight two-layer closure of the surgical scalp wound.[
Without any doubt, there is enough ground to suspect that by retaining the cranial bone flap on-site under the scalp and directly over the swollen brain the techniques of HC including our own may limit the extents of the cerebral expansion and intracranial decompression possible following DC. Evidence exists however in some of the advanced neurosurgical units of the West that have the facility for ICP monitoring that uncontrollable preoperative raised ICP does respond to the procedure and that measurable good patients’ outcomes are obtained.[
The one main difference between the “new” technique of HC being proposed by us and the preceding ones is the fact that the temporalis muscle is retained in ours, while it is usually completely raised and so is out of the way of the cranial flaps in the others. It may therefore be logical to suspect that the presence of the bulk of the temporalis muscle may further limit the available volume for cranial decompression in our procedure. There is some evidence nonetheless that hinged frontal bone elevation of as little as 10 mm affords an up to 6% increase in the total cranial capacity[
CONCLUSIONS
This is an illustrated technical case series showing the possible practical utility of the surgical technique of hinge decompressive craniectomy using the temporalis muscle, the “hDC temporalis.” It is an intuitive adaptation of some earlier procedures of hinge DC also called hinge craniotomy which, in the advanced countries where they are described, make use of expensive metallic foreign body implants. This new procedure, in that it makes use of the patient's own body tissue, the temporalis muscle, is much less expensive than its forerunners; and our initial observations suggest that it might be just as effective as they are.
References
1. Adeleye AO. Decompressive craniectomy for traumatic brain injury in a developing country: An initial observational study. Indian J Neurotrauma. 2010. 7: 41-6
2. Adeleye AO, Olowookere KG, Olayemi OO. Clinicoepidemiological profiles and outcomes during first hospital admission of head injury patients in Ikeja, Nigeria. A prospective cohort study. Neuroepidemiology. 2009. 32: 136-41
3. Akins PT, Guppy KH. Sinking skin flaps, paradoxical herniation, and external brain tamponade: A review of decompressive craniectomy management. Neurocrit Care. 2008. 9: 269-76
4. Baldo S, Tacconi L. Effectiveness and safety of subcutaneous abdominal preservation of autologous bone flap after decompressive craniectomy: A prospective pilot study. World Neurosurg. 2010. 73: 552-6
5. Basso A, Previgliano I, Duarte JM, Ferrari N. Advances in management of neurosurgical trauma in different continents. World J Surg. 2001. 25: 1174-8
6. Bhaskar IP, Zaw NN, Zheng M, Lee GY. Bone flap storage following craniectomy: A survey of practices in major Australian neurosurgical centres. ANZ J Surg. 2011. 81: 137-41
7. Buchfelder M, Ljunggren B. Wilhelm Wagner (1848-1900).Part 2: The osteoplastic flap. Surg Neurol. 1988. 30: 428-33
8. Burger R, Duncker D, Uzma N, Rohde V. Decompressive craniotomy: Durotomy instead of duroplasty to reduce prolonged ICP elevation. Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2008. 102: 93-7
9. Chibbaro S, Marsella M, Romano A, Ippolito S, Benericetti E. Combined internal uncusectomy and decompressive craniectomy for the treatment of severe closed head injury: Experience with 80 cases. J Neurosurg. 2008. 108: 74-9
10. Flannery T, McConnell RS. Cranioplasty: Why throw the bone flap out?. Br J Neurosurg. 2001. 15: 518-20
11. Goel A, Deogaonkar M. Subgaleal preservation of calvarial flaps. Surg Neurol. 1995. 44: 181-2
12. Goettler CE, Tucci KA. Decreasing the morbidity of decompressive craniectomy: The Tucci flap. J Trauma. 2007. 62: 777-8
13. Gooch MR, Gin GE, Kenning TJ, German JW. Complications of cranioplasty following decompressive craniectomy: Analysis of 62 cases. Neurosurg Focus. 2009. 26: E9-
14. Grossman N, Shemesh-Jan HS, Merkin V, Gideon M, Cohen A. Deep-freeze preservation of cranial bones for future cranioplasty: Nine years of experience in Soroka University Medical Center. Cell Tissue Bank. 2007. 8: 243-6
15. Guresir E, Vatter H, Schuss P, Oszvald A, Raabe A, Seifert V. Rapid closure technique in decompressive craniectomy. J Neurosurg. 2011. 114: 954-60
16. Joshipura MK, Shah HS, Patel PR, Divatia PA, Desai PM. Trauma care systems in India. Injury. 2003. 34: 686-92
17. Kenning TJ, Gandhi RH, German JW. A comparison of hinge craniotomy and decompressive craniectomy for the treatment of malignant intracranial hypertension: Early clinical and radiographic analysis. Neurosurg Focus. 2009. 26: E6-
18. Ko K, Segan S. In situ hinge craniectomy. Neurosurgery. 2007. 60: S255-8
19. Krishnan P, Bhattacharyya AK, Sil K, De R. Bone flap preservation after decompressive craniectomy--experience with 55 cases. Neurol India. 2006. 54: 291-2
20. Mracek J, Choc M, Mracek Z. [Osteoplastic decompressive craniotomy--Indication and surgical technique]. Rozhl Chir. 2010. 89: 109-12
21. Pasaoglu A, Kurtsoy A, Koc RK, Kontas O, Akdemir H, Oktem IS. Cranioplasty with bone flaps preserved under the scalp. Neurosurg Rev. 1996. 19: 153-6
22. Piek J. Decompressive surgery in the treatment of traumatic brain injury. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2002. 8: 134-8
23. Schmidt JH, Reyes BJ, Fischer R, Flaherty SK. Use of hinge craniotomy for cerebral decompression.Technical note. J Neurosurg. 2007. 107: 678-82
24. Shoakazemi A, Flannery T, McConnell RS. Long-term outcome of subcutaneously preserved autologous cranioplasty. Neurosurgery. 2009. 65: 505-10
25. Stephens FL, Mossop CM, Bell RS, Tigno T, Rosner MK, Kumar A. Cranioplasty complications following wartime decompressive craniectomy. Neurosurg Focus. 2010. 28: E3-
26. Toussaint CP. Decompressive Craniectomy: Review of Indication, Outcome and Implication. Neurosurg Q. 2008. 18: 45-53