Tools
Nancy E. Epstein
  1. Department of NeuroScience/Neurosurgery, Winthrop University Hospital, Mineola, New York 11501, USA

Correspondence Address:
Nancy E. Epstein
Department of NeuroScience/Neurosurgery, Winthrop University Hospital, Mineola, New York 11501, USA

DOI:10.4103/2152-7806.166887

Copyright: © 2015 Surgical Neurology International This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

How to cite this article: Epstein NE. Timing and prognosis of surgery for spinal epidural abscess: A review. Surg Neurol Int 08-Oct-2015;6:

How to cite this URL: Epstein NE. Timing and prognosis of surgery for spinal epidural abscess: A review. Surg Neurol Int 08-Oct-2015;6:. Available from: http://surgicalneurologyint.com/surgicalint_articles/timing-and-prognosis-of-surgery-for-spinal-epidural-abscess/

Date of Submission
07-Aug-2015

Date of Acceptance
10-Aug-2015

Date of Web Publication
08-Oct-2015

Abstract

Background:The nonsurgical versus surgical management of spinal epidural abscesses (SEAs) remains controversial. Even with the best preoperative screening for multiple risk factors, high nonoperative failure rates are attended by considerable morbidity (e.g., irreversible paralysis) and mortality. Therefore, the focus remains on early surgery.

Methods:Most papers promote early recognition of the clinical triad (e.g., fever [50%], spinal pain [92–100%], and neurological deficits [47%]) for SEA. They also identify SEA-related risk factors for choosing nonsurgical versus surgical approaches; advanced age (>65 or 80), diabetes (15–30%), cancer, intravenous drug abuse (25%), smoking (23%), elevated white blood cell count (>12.5), high C-reactive protein >115, positive blood cultures, magnetic resonance imaging/computed tomographic documented cord compression, and significant neurological deficits (e.g., 19–45%).

Results:Surgical options include: decompressions, open versus minimally invasive biopsy/culture/irrigation, or fusions. Up to 75% of SEA involve the thoracolumbar spine, and 50% are located ventrally. Wound cultures are positive in up to 78.8% of cases and are often (60%) correlated with positive blood cultures. The most typical offending organism is methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus, followed by methicillin sensitive S. aureus. Unfortunately, the failure rates for nonoperative treatment of SEA remain high (e.g., 41–42.5%), contributing to significant morbidity (22% risk of permanent paralysis), and mortality (3–25%).

Conclusion:The vast majority of studies advocated early surgery to achieve better outcomes for treating SEA; this avoids high failure rates (41–42.5%) for nonoperative therapy, and limits morbidity/mortality rates.

Keywords: Medical management, neurological deficit, open surgery: Minimally invasive surgery, paraplegia, spinal epidural abscess, surgical decompression, timing

INTRODUCTION

The nonsurgical versus surgical management of spinal epidural abscesses (SEAs) remain controversial. Even the best preoperative screening for multiple risk factors (clinical, laboratory, and radiographic) may result in high nonoperative failure rates, with significant morbidity/mortality. Most SEA patients, ranging in age from their mid 50s to mid 60s, present with the classical triad of fever (50%), spinal pain (47.1–100%), and weakness (19–55.8%).[ 1 8 24 27 29 ] Major clinical risk factors predisposing to SEA include; diabetes (15–35.8%), advanced age (>50, 65, or 80), renal disease (30.2%), vascular disease (31.3%), smoking 23%, cancer history (16%), intravenous (IV) drug abuse (10–39.1%), alcohol abuse (4%), sepsis (15–40%) (methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus [MRSA] or methicillin sensitive S. aureus [MSSA]), and positive cultures (59.3–70.7%) [Tables 1 3 ].[ 9 12 24 26 29 ] Laboratory, diagnostic, and neurological criteria that prompt early surgery include; elevated white blood cell count (WBC > 12.5) C-reactive protein (CRP) (>115), positive blood cultures, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)/computed tomographic (CT) images of cord compression, and neurological deficits [e.g., 19– 45%]).[ 24 27 ]


Table 1

Diagnosis and outcomes for series of >100 cases of SEAs

 

Table 2

Diagnosis and outcomes for series of 40-<100 cases of SEA

 

Table 3

Diagnosis and outcomes for series of 1-<40 cases of SEAs

 

The timing of SEA surgery is typically categorized as early if performed at/within <24 h (mean 11.2 h) or late if performed after >24 h (mean 59 h).[ 3 11 ] SEA surgical options include direct open versus minimally invasive surgical (MIS) techniques (e.g., CT endoscopically guided, apical laminectomies, other) to achieve decompression (40%) or drainage of abscesses (32%) (biopsy/culture/irrigation) with or without fusion (26%).[ 9 12 ] Up to 75% of SEA involve the thoracolumbar spine and 50% are typically ventrally located (e.g., anterior surgery warranted 35–56.7% of cases).[ 28 29 ] Open or MIS (e.g., biopsy/aspiration) surgery yield positive wound cultures in up to 78.8–90.5% of cases (not 100%).[ 8 33 34 ] Early surgery typically achieves better outcomes for patients with SEA, while those treated nonsurgically continue to exhibit unacceptably high failure rates (41–42.5%) accompanied by increased morbidity (up to 22% permanent paralysis) and mortality (rates from 1.8% to 25%).[ 2 8 9 26 27 29 ]

This review provides an overview of the presentation, clinical, radiographic, and surgical management of SEA [Tables 1 4 ]. The vast majority of studies advocate early surgery, factoring in specific high risk factors while only the minority chose nonoperative intervention in their general absence.


Table 4

Summary of review articles

 

SPINAL EPIDURAL ABSCESS DUE TO EPIDURAL STEROID INJECTIONS

Cervical meningomyelitis following lumbar epidural steroid injection: Case study

Lee et al. noted that the greater number of lumbar epidural steroid injection (ESI) are correlated with higher complication rates.[ 17 ] They presented a 60-year-old diabetic male who developed an S1epidural hematoma following multiple lumbar ESI; he was started on antibiotics with the initial diagnosis of an SEA. Three days later, when he developed progressive upper and lower extremity weakness, the cervical MRI documented a cervical/brain stem SEA; despite debridement, he failed to neurologically improve.

Spinal and paraspinal fungal infections (abscess, phlegmon, arachnoiditis, and osteomyelitis) associated with the contaminated methylprednisolone epidural steroid injection

Moudgal et al. tracked patients who developed spinal or paraspinal fungal infections due to the injections of exserohilum-contaminated methylprednisolone (Michigan Department of Community Health, electronic medical records (EMRs), and MRI reports).[ 19 ] Out of 544 patients receiving contaminated ESI, 153 (28%) were diagnosed at one institution with probable/confirmed spinal/paraspinal fungal infection at the injection site; 41 had meningitis/spinal or paraspinal infection, while 112 had only spinal/paraspinal infection. MRI findings included; abscess, phlegmon, arachnoiditis, and osteomyelitis. Surgical debridement was performed for 116 patients who demonstrated epidural phlegmon and/or SEA; fungal infection was demonstrated in 78 patients (51%) (e.g., hyphae in tissues, positive polymerase chain reaction, or culture). The authors concluded that of the 153 patients who developed spinal/paraspinal fungal infection at the site of ESI contaminated with methylprednisolone, 116 (76%) required surgery plus treatment with antifungal agents; 5 ultimately expired.

TIMING OF SURGERY FOR SPINAL EPIDURAL ABSCESSES

Optimal timing of surgery for spinal epidural abscess within 24 h

Utilizing meta-analyses, Ghobrial et al. focused on the optimal timing of surgery for SEA or other spinal infections (e.g., osteomyelitis, osteodiscitis, and spondylodiscitis).[ 11 ] They noted that 1 of 10,000 hospitalized patients has a SEA/other spinal infections with a mortality rate of up to 16%; their hypothesis was that patients undergoing early surgery had better outcomes. This study involved a retrospective analysis (2009–2011) of 87 patients who had early (evacuation within 24 h) versus delayed surgery (>24 h) for the treatment of SEA. They were all assigned American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) Impairment Scale grades. Patients averaged 55.5 years of age. Of the 54 having early surgery (admission to incision, 11.2 h), 45 (85%) had neurological deficits, while of 33 undergoing late surgery (mean 59 h), 21 (64%) had neurological deficits. Notably, those in the delayed surgery groups were significantly older (>10 years; 59.6 vs. 51.8 years, P = 0.01). The two groups showed no significant differences regarding prior revision surgery, body mass index, IV (intravenous) drug abuse, smoking, prior radiation therapy, diabetes, chronic infection, and prior osteomyelitis. The most common organism isolated was MSSA (n = 51, 59.3%) and MRSA (n = 18: 21%). The authors concluded; surgery at <24 h correlated with a better neurological grade at discharge.

Preoperative neurological status best determined outcome for bacterial spinal epidural abscess

In their literature review of 40 SEA articles, Shweikeh et al. emphasized the import of early recognition of bacterial SEA as the preoperative neurological status determined the best postoperative outcome.[ 29 ] Early surgery defined as within 36–72 h from onset of neurological deficits, was recommended as opposed to medical treatment alone. The latter correlated with high failure rates attributed to delayed surgery greater permanent morbidity.

EPIDEMIOLOGY, DIAGNOSIS, AND MANAGEMENT OF OSTEOMYELITIS AND/OR SPINAL EPIDURAL ABSCESSES SUMMARIES OF STUDIES INVOLVING >100 CASES

Mortality, complications, and charges for spinal epidural abscesses in 30,274 patients from a Nationwide Inpatient Sample Study

Schoenfeld and Wahlquist looked at the Nationwide Inpatient Sample of 30,274 individuals (2006–2011) in order to predict the morbidity/mortality (in-hospital: Failure to rescue from a complication) and total charges for patients undergoing SEA surgery [ Table 1 ].[ 26 ] Patients averaged 57.4 years (±14.7 years) of age, 63% were caucasian, 27% were underinsured, 30% had diabetes, and 19% presented with some degree of paralysis (19%). Other medical comorbid factors included; age over 80, liver disease, or renal failure. Notably, 26% of patients had one or more complications, and 3% died during their hospital stay. Of interest, the average total charge was $159,782, but with a marked range from $4008 to $3,373,410 likely reflecting the prolonged hospitalizations required for the patients incurring marked increased morbidity.

Medical and surgical management of 1099 spinal epidural ascesses: A systematic review

Arko et al. noted that SEA have typically (particularly prior to 1999) been managed with emergent surgery/decompression and antibiotic therapy [ Table 1 ].[ 4 ] Here, utilizing PubMed Boolean search engines, they identified 12 articles that directly contrasted operative versus nonoperative treatment of SEA involving 1099 patients who had MRI studies obtained early in the clinical course. Patients averaged 57.24 years of age, 62.5% were male, and blood and wound cultures documented S. aureus (MRSA/MSSA: 63.6%) or Streptococcus species (6.8%). Surgery was performed in 59.7% of patients, while 40.3%, typically without neurological deficits, were treated with the antibiotics alone.

Independent risk factors help predict failure of nonoperative management of 355 spinal epidural abscesses

Kim et al. stipulated that medical management may be successful in a subset of patients with SEA and that all do not require surgery [ Table 1 ].[ 15 ] Notably, they excluded postsurgical SEA or phlegmon without an abscess, as well as those with a complete spinal cord injury from SEA for longer than 48 h. Out of 355 patients with SEA who averaged 60 years of age, 127 were managed nonsurgically; 73 were successfully treated without surgery while another 54 failed nonsurgical therapy and required delayed surgery. The most significant risk factors that appeared to contribute to failed medical treatment included; preoperative incomplete or complete spinal cord deficits, age over 65, diabetes, and MRSA. Without such risk factors, nonoperative therapy for SEA “may be considered as the initial line of treatment with close monitoring.”

Hematogenous vertebral osteomyelitis (not spinal epidural abscess) caused by Gram-negative bacteria in 313 cases

In a study involving three tertiary-care centers over a 7 year period, Park et al. found that Gram Negative bacteria (GNB) were responsible for 65 (20.8%) of the 313 hematogenously spread cases of vertebral osteomyelitis (HVO).[ 23 ] Those with GNB HVO included more diabetic females. Outcomes were similar for the GNB versus MSSA groups regarding in-hospital mortality (4.6% vs. 7.8%), recurrence (9.7% vs. 4.3%), and morbidity. They did recommend antibiotic therapy for ≥8 weeks for those in the GNB HVO group.

Surgical treatment of spondylodiscitis in 135 patients with the neurological deficits: Predicting clinical outcomes

Roßbach et al. successfully utilized preoperative neurological deficits in 135 patients with CT/MRI documented SEA (13 patients) or spondylodiscitis (122 patients) to predict clinical outcomes [ Table 1 ].[ 25 ] There were 102 Group I patients without neurological deficits (Frankel E) while the remaining 33 in Group II were in Frankel Grades A-D (e.g., 13 of 33 patients had a SEA). Twenty-eight of the 33 patients in poorer Frankel grades in Group II were treated surgically; for the 20 without a SEA, 11 improved and 9 remained unchanged while 4 of 13 with SEA died.

High failure rates with nonoperative management of 128 spinal epidural abscesses; utility of four major risk factors

Patel et al. retrospectively evaluated how multiple risk factors impacted outcomes of SEA managed medically or with antibiotics combined with surgery [ Table 1 ].[ 24 ] They looked at 128 consecutive patients who presented with spontaneous SEA averaging 52.9 years of age. Patients had bacterial SEA (radiographic/surgical confirmation); they excluded those thought to have SEA but with negative intraoperative findings/cultures. The patients were followed an average of 241 days. Chief complaints included; pain (100%), fevers (50%), and weakness (47%). The location of lesions included; 54.7% lumbar, and 39.1% thoracic (average 3.85 disc levels). Lesions were located: 36% ventral, 41% dorsal, and 23% circumferentially. Major risk factors included; IV (intravenous) drug abuse (39.1%), and diabetes mellitus (DM) (21.9%). Pathogens included; MSSA (40%) and MRSA (30%). Primary surgery and antibiotics were utilized in 77 patients (Group 2). However, for those 51 managed nonoperatively, 30 were successfully treated while 21 patients (41%) failed medical management (e.g., demonstrated progressive motor deficit or increased pain and required delayed surgery) [Group 3]). Medical management failure correlated with four risk factors; DM, CRP >115, WBC >12.5, and positive blood cultures (bacteremia). The authors concluded; early surgery improves neurologic outcomes, whereas nonsurgical management has a high (41%) failure rate. Furthermore, four risk factors help predict those likely to become nonoperative failures.

Retrospective evaluation of surgically treated spondylodiscitis in 113 patients

Shiban et al. retrospectively analyzed 113 consecutive patients who had surgical decompression/instrumentation performed for spondylodiscitis (2006 and 2010) at one institution; SEA were noted in 33 patients (29%) [ Table 1 ].[ 27 ] Patients averaged 65 years of age. Infections involved the lumbar spine in 68 (60%), thoracic spine in 19 (17%), and cervical spine in 20 (18%) cases. Preoperatively, the patients typically exhibited both pain (92%) and neurological deficits (40 patients: 35%); postoperatively, deficits resolved in 20 patients, while 14 had partial recoveries, and 6 showed no improvement. Postoperative IV antibiotics (given for 14.4 ± 9.3 (mean ± standard deviation [SD]) days) were followed by 3.2 ± 0.8 (mean ± SD) months of oral therapy. They observed full resolution of infection in 111 (98%) cases; however, 2 died of septic shock attributed to endocarditis. The authors, therefore, recommended early surgery for newly diagnosed spinal infections including SEA.

Institutional series with bacterial spinal epidural abscesses in 106 patients

Shweikeh et al. evaluated bacterial SEA encountered at one institution over an 11-year period (2001–2012) utilizing the electronic medical record (EMR) while also reviewing the pertinent literature (e.g., PubMed 2000–2011) [ Table 1 ].[ 29 ] Their hospital-based series identified 106 patients with bacterial SEA averaging 63.3 ± 13.7 years of age; 65.1% of patients were male. Classic symptoms of SEA included; back pain (47.1%) and focal neurological deficits (47.1%). Furthemore, 75% were located in the thoracolumbar spine, with more than 50% found ventrally. Historical predisposing comorbid risk factors included; DM (35.8%), vascular disease (31.3%), and renal insufficiency/dialysis (30.2%). Organisms responsible for SEA included; S. aureus (MRSA/MSSA: 70.7%), and Streptococcus spp. (6.6%). Both surgery and antibiotics were utilized to manage 63 (59.4%) patients. Surgical procedures included; spinal fusion (19 patients; 30.2%), discectomy (14 patients; 22.2%), and corpectomy (9 patients; 14.3%). Outcomes at 8.4 ± 26 weeks (range 0–192 weeks) were categorized as good (60.7%) or poor (39.3%).

SUMMARIES OF SPINAL EPIDURAL ABSCESS CASES INVOLVING 40 TO <100 CASES

Surgery versus medical management of 82 spinal epidural abscesses in patients 50 years of age or older

Adogwa et al. analyzed SEAs in 82 patients over the age of 50 treated at one institution (15 years) (1999 and 2013); 30 [37%] had surgery, while 52 [63%] were treated with antibiotics/CT-guided aspiration or antibiotics based on blood cultures alone.[ 2 ] Patients averaged 65 ± 8.58 years of age and were followed for an average of 41.38 ± 86.48 weeks. Good outcomes were observed in 12 patients; in 7 patients (23%) with surgery versus 5 (10%) without surgery. The clinical status of 41 patients (50%) was unchanged (e.g., for 10 [33%] after undergoing surgery vs. 31 [60%] who were treated nonoperatively). Critically, 20 patients (25%) died; 9 (30%) were treated operatively versus 11 (21%) who were treated nonoperatively. Poor outcomes correlated with; increased baseline pain, paraplegia, or quadriplegia on initial presentation, and dorsally located SEA.

Operative versus nonoperative management of 72 spinal epidural abscess

Connor et al. retrospectively reviewed nonoperative versus operative treatment of SEA [ Table 2 ].[ 8 ] They identified 77 patients averaging 51.4 years of age who presented with axial pain (67.5% of cases), focal weakness (55.8%), radiculopathy (28.6%), and myelopathy (5.2%). SEA involved the lumbar 39 cases [50.6%], thoracic spine in 20 cases [26.0%], and cervical sine in 18 cases [23.4%], respectively. Surgical site interventional biopsy/cultures documented organisms in 52 cases (78.8%), and correlated with blood culture results in 36 (60.0%) cases. Peripheral blood cultures were negative in 32 (45.1%) of 71 patients. MRSA was found in 24 cases (31.2%). The mean duration between admission and surgery was 5.5 days (range 0–42 days; within 72 h in 66.7% of cases). Outcomes in 72 cases showed; 57 patients (79.2%), improved, 6 (8.3%) improved minimally, or 9 (12.5%) showed no improvement/worsening. More advanced patient age and more severe preoperative deficits significantly correlated with poorer outcomes.

Poorer outcomes for managing 62 cervical spinal epidural abscesses without versus with early surgery

Alton et al. retrospectively evaluated the risk factors associated with the neurological outcomes for 62 patients with cervical SEA treated either with antibiotics alone (e.g. originally neurologically intact (Group 1) or with delayed deterioration (Group 3)) versus early surgery (Group 2) [ Table 2 ].[ 3 ] Using EMRs they tracked motor scores (MS) and neurological outcomes (ASIA score) for the patients in three treatment groups: medical treatment alone, failed medical management leading to subsequent surgery, and early surgery. Of the 62 patients in the series, 24 were initially managed medically; 6 in Group 1 were successfully managed medically alone (MS increased 2.3 points), while 18 (75%) in Group 3 failed medical treatment and required delayed surgery (time to odds ratio 7.02 days) with a net MS drop of 15.89 (SD 24.9). The remaining 38 patients successfully underwent early surgery (Group 2) (average time to surgery 24.4 h) with better outcomes (average MS increase 11.89 points). The authors concluded that for treating cervical SEA, early surgery resulted in better outcome/MS scores whereas nonsurgical management requiring delayed surgery correlated with high failure rates (75%) and poorer neurological outcomes (average MS drop of 15.89 points).

Epidemiology of vertebral osteomyelitis in 50 patients

Doutchi et al. evaluated the morbidity of vertebral osteomyelitis in 50 patients over a 5-year period [ Table 2 ].[ 9 ] Patients averaged 55 years of age; 84% were males. Comorbidities in 62% of patients included: DM (24%), malignancy (16%), IV drug use (10%) and alcoholism (4%). Etiologies of infection in 66% of cases involved postoperative (18%) versus hematogenous infection (48%) sources. Diagnoses were confirmed over an average of 36 days. One organism was present in 92% of cases Gram-positive bacteria [76% of cases], and Gram-negative bacteria [GNB] [18% of cases]. Antibiotics were administered over an average of 123 days. Surgery in 41 of 50 cases included; fusion (26%), drainage of abscesses (32%), or decompression alone (40%). Postoperatively, the patients complained of pain (24%), and demonsrated a 22% incidence of continued neurologic deficits (more with cervical disease). The authors concluded that despite the availability of better diagnostic studies and improved surgical techniques, too many patients exhibited significant, irreversible neurologic deficits attributed to osteomyelitis.

Management of 50 patients with cervical spondylodiscitis/spinal epidural abscesses plus literature review

Shousha et al. evaluated the surgical treatment (debridement/reconstruction and antibiotics for 8–12 postoperative weeks) and outcomes for 50 consecutive patients with cervical spondylodiscitis/SEA managed at one institution [ Table 2 ].[ 28 ] The first 20 (Group A) patients had surgery from 1994 to 1999 while 30 (Group B) patients were treated between 2004 and 2009. The average age for the patients in series A was 59.7; this incresaed to 64.5 years of age in series B. The extent of neurological deficits remained similar (40–45%) for both groups. However, the percentage of sepsis for Groups A and B increased from 15% to 40%, while the incidence of clearly defined SEA increased from 60% to 80%. Notably SEA also increased from being monosegmental in Group A (85%), to involving 2–3 segments (43.3%) in Group B. There was also a trend favoring more anterior surgery in the latter group; (35%) in Group A, and 56.7% for Group B (56.7%). Patients followed an average of 2.8 years. The overall mortality increased from 5% to 10% in the two respective series.

Surgery for 40 cervical spinal epidural abscesses: Increased circumferential management

Ghobrial et al. retrospectively analyzed 40 consecutive patients from multiple studies (1997–2011) presenting with cervical SEA.[ 12 ] In these studies, patients were progressively managed with single-stage anteroposterior decompressions and stabilization procedures rather than separate operations [ Table 2 ].[ 12 ] Clinical predisposing risk factors included; average age of 53, IV drug abuse in 10 patients (25%), 6 (15%) with diabetes, 6 (15%) with cancer, 2 with prior neck irradiation, and 9 (23%) who were smokers. Discitis predominantly occurred at C6/C7 in 12 (30%) patients, and at C5/C6 in 11 (28%) patients. Most patients were ASIA score D (20 patients (50%)), followed by ASIA score E (9 patients (28%)). MRI studies documented that 17 (43%) SEA was dorsal, 12 were ventral (30%) while 11 were circumferential (28%). Most were managed with 360 procedures (e.g., anterior followed by posterior decompression/fusion [n = 26, 65%]), while 8 (20%) had a ventral, and 6 had dorsal approaches (15%). Fusion was achieved in 39 of 40 (97.5%) patients. The authors concluded that for cervical SEA, acute evacuation/decompression, and shifting to staged treatment did not increase complications rates.

SUMMARIES OF STUDIES INVOLVING 1 TO <40 CASES OF SPINAL EPIDURAL ABSCESSES

Treatment of primary pyogenic spinal epidural abscess: Import of timing of surgery in 23 patients

Avanali et al. noted that SEA, even when diagnosed and treated in a timely fashion, often leads to irretrievable neurological deficits [ Table 3 ].[ 5 ] They evaluated the results for 23 patients whose SEA were diagnosed later in the course of their disease.; only 2 had a normal neurological function, 11 were plegic while the remaining 10 experienced some improvement in function.

Safety of instrumentation/fusion with surgical debridement of osteomyelitis for spinal epidural abscesses in 7 cases

Following radical debridement, Talia et al. evaluated the safety/efficacy of single-stage instrumentation/fusion (6 thoracic, 2 lumbar, and 1 cervical infections) in 9 patients (5 diabetics) with spinal infections (e.g., vertebral osteomyelitis or SEA).[ 30 ] Seven patients had bacterial infections (predominantly S. aureus) while 2 had tuberculosis. All were treated with antibiotics for up to 12 postoperative months, and neither developed complications or the need to remove of instrumentation.

Cervical osteomyelitis/thoracic myelitis and meningitis in a diabetic patient

Ohnishi et al. reported on a 45-year-old male with untreated diabetes, who presented paraparetic after 2 weeks of fever, back pain, and what was diagnosed as flu/gastroenteritis [ Table 3 ].[ 22 ] With the original diagnosis of infectious meningitis/myelitis, he was presumptively given piperacillin and steroids (e.g., no cerebrospinal fluid [CSF] study). At the next institutions, with a high fever and full-blown paraplegia, he underwent a lumbar puncture that revealed a yellowish CSF, characterized by polynucleosis, and hypoglycorrhachia but with a negative Gram-stain/culture. The MRI scan showed a cervical SEA without cord compression, but there was no pathology involving the thoracolumbar region. He was teated with broad-spectrum antibiotics. Two weeks later, now with a progressive quadriparesis, the MRI newly demonstrated a cervical SEA with cord compression; he immediately underwent operative debridement and was treated with an additional antibiotic for; one month later, he underwent a secondary 360° fusion 1-month later.

Infectious spondylodiscitis, epidural phlegmon, and psoas abscess in a diabetic

In a 63-year-old diabetic male with back pain, hyperpyrexia, and right calcaneal osteomyelitis, Nicolosi and Pratt reported hematogenous spread of MRSA resulting in a right psoas muscle abscess, L4–L5 osteomyelitis, and an SEA extending from T9–S1 [ Table 3 ].[ 20 ] Following spinal surgery to drain the T9–L1 SEA and a decompression/fusion at L4–L5, he demonstrated partial recovery from his preoperative paraparesis (e.g., required a walker/cane to perform activities of daily living).

Cervical spinal epidural abscess due to bacterial endocarditis with streptococcus viridans: Single case study

Oh et al. presented a patient with a cervical SEA due to streptococcus viridans endocarditis that was successfully treated with IV antibiotics for 8 weeks without sequelae [ Table 3 ].[ 21 ]

Successful antibiotic treatment alone of thoracic spinal epidural abscess after epidural catheterization; single case study

Hernández-Puiggròs et al. presented the case of a thoracic epidural abscess forming following epidural catheter placement for a patient undergoing lobar lung resection. Six days after surgery the patient complained of “pulsatile” back pain accompanied by purulence at the catheter site [ Table 3 ].[ 13 ] The thoracic MRI documented a SEA that was successfully treated with antibiotics. This treatment was chosen after a consensus decision among neurosurgery, infectious diseases, and anesthesia services. In this case, the abscess fully resolved without complications.

DRAINAGE OF SPINAL EPIDURAL ABSCESSES WITH MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY

Minimally invasive surgery endoscopy to treat 32 cases of lumbar infectious spondylitis

In 32 patients with lumbar single-level infectious spondylodiscitis, postoperative infectious spondylodiscitis, and SEA, Yang et al. evaluated the efficacy of percutaneous endoscopic epidural debridement using “dilute betadine solution irrigation (percutaneous endoscopy dilute betadine solution irrigation [PEDI])” (2005 to July 2010) [ Table 3 ][ 34 ] Positive bacterial cultures were identified in 28 (87.5%) of 32 biopsy specimens, and directed the use of appropriate antibiotic therapy. Postprocedure, 27 (84.4%) reported satisfactory relief of back pain, and 26 (81.3%) recovered uneventfully utilizing antibiotic therapy alone. They recommended PEDI for those not adequately responding to antibiotics alone, and as an alternative to major open surgery. Notably, however, 3 developed transient paresthesias in the affected lumbar segment.

Percutaneous endoscopic lavage/drainage for 21 patients with lumbar infectious spondylodiscitis

Yang et al. retrospectively assessed the safety/efficacy of percutaneous endoscopic lavage and drainage (PELD) for 21 patients with infectious spondylitis to help determine whether MIS (PELD) would suffice and avoid open surgery [ Table 3 ].[ 33 ] Those with significant neurological deficits and significant instability were excluded. Pathology for the three treatment groups included: paraspinal abscesses, postoperative recurrent infection, and multilevel infections. Positive bacterial cultures were found in 19 (90.5%) of 21 biopsies; 18 were effectively treated with antibiotics alone. Nevertheless, in 3 patients with multilevel infections, anterior debridement/fusions were warranted within 2 weeks following PELD. The overall infection rate was controlled in 86% of cases. One patient with SEA and spondylolytic spondylolisthesis at L5–S1 required an instrumented fusion 5 months later. Two patients developed transient paraesthesias in the affected lumbar segment.

Minimally invasive spine surgery in spinal infections

Verdú-López et al. noted that new MIS techniques might address spine infections.[ 32 ] Specifically, using percutaneous image guided techniques, (e.g., endoscopic, microsurgical techniques with/without tubular retractors), some of these procedures are touted as safe and effective, resulting in reduced morbidity and enhanced patient recovery.

Holocord spinal epidural abscess treated with alternating unilateral approach (skip laminectomy): Single case study

In a 51 year old with bilateral lower extremity weakness attributed to a C4–S1 holocord SEA, Hwang et al. utilized a unilateral level-skipping laminectomy technique that effectively preserved stability [ Table 3 ].[ 14 ]

Holocord spinal epidural abscesses treated with “apical laminectomies:” 2 case studies

Abd-El-Barr et al. (JNS 2015) reported 2 cases in which apical laminectomies (e.g., an alternative to skip laminectomies) provided irrigation/drainage of extensive C1–C2 to L5–S1 SEA [ Table 3 ].[ 1 ] First, a pediatric feeding tube was placed epidurally in the mid thoracic spine (apical laminectomy). The catheter was then both directed cephalad toward the mid cervical, and subsequently caudally toward the mid lumbar laminectomy sites. Advantages of this method included; avoiding extensive laminectomies and the increased morbidity due to prolonged/extensive surgery with the inherent increased risk of instability and estimated blood loss. SEAs were clinically and radiographically cleared in both patients. Furthermore, neither developed instability within 12 postoperative months.

REVIEW ARTICLES [TABLE 4]

Treatment algorithm for timing of surgery versus nonsurgical management for spinal epidural abscesses

Tuchman et al. emphasized that although the typical treatment for SEA includes emergency surgery and protracted antibiotic therapy, some series with very carefully selected patients have successfully utilized antibiotic treatment alone [ Table 4 ].[ 31 ] They reviewed the SEA literature (e.g., PubMed) to determine both the optimal timing for SEA surgery and to determine which patients could be safely triaged to nonoperative therapy only. They identified 28 case series (each included a minimum of 30 patients) that discussed treatment and outcome; 26 were retrospective studies. Based on these studies, the authors developed the following evidence-based algorithm for nonoperative/antibiotic management alone of the patients with SEA. This algorithm included; those unable to have surgery, complete spinal cord injuries >48 h old with “low clinical or radiographic concern for ascending lesions,” and the patients who were neurologically stable without significant risk factors for failed medical therapy. Notably, all of these patients had to be closely monitored for potential neurological worsening and were informed: “Delayed neurological deterioration may not fully resolve even after prompt surgical treatment.” Overall, they concluded, “good surgical candidates should receive their operation as soon as possible because the rate of clinical deterioration with SEA is notoriously unpredictable.” They further noted that when “neurological injury becomes irreversible is unknown, supporting emergency surgery in those patients with acute findings.”

Epidural infection: Is it an abscess?

Avilucea and Patel assessed the literature/PubMed regarding organisms identified, and the diagnosis/management of SEA [ Table 4 ].[ 6 ] Notably, it is difficult to establish this diagnosis before the triad of back pain, fever, and neurological deficit appear. Being familiar with other risk factors and obtaining diagnostic information earlier (e.g., lab studies, MRI) are critical and help direct whether medical versus surgical management will be warranted. Most problematic is the late diagnosis of SEA and irretrievable neurological deficits.

Vertebral osteomyelitis and spinal epidural abscess: Evidence-based review

Boody et al. noted that spinal infections are typically associated with significant morbidity and mortality rates.[ 7 ] Despite newer treatment protocols offering prompt diagnosis (e.g., identification of risk factors, laboratory studies, MRI, CT imaging studies), medical and surgical management strategies have not markedly improved patients’ outcomes. This study reviewed the recent literature and latest evidence-based recommendations for treating vertebral osteomyelitis and SEA, the two most common primary spinal infections.

A review of spinal epidural abscesses: Early diagnosis with magnetic resonance imaging studies

Krishnamohan and Berger emphasized that for SEA, early diagnosis with MRI studies, and surgical management yielded the best outcomes [ Table 4 ].[ 16 ] Nevertheless, diagnostic delays were common and few randomized controlled trials clearly identified optimal treatment strategies. They noted that most SEA were located in the thoracic followed by the lumbar and cervical regions. Patients typically presented with the triad of fever, spinal pain, and neurological deficits; the severity of the latter best determined final outcomes. The most typical organism responsible for SEA was S. aureus (20%).

Pyogenic and nonpyogenic spinal infections diagnosed with diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging: Abscesses and pus collections

Although Moritani et al. noted that conventional MRI is typically utilized to diagnose SEA, in fact, diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) provides earlier and more accurate detection of abscess and pus collections within the spine along with an excellent means of following the efficacy of treatment.[ 18 ] They reviewed the 4 diagnoses readily established utilizing MRI/DWIs: “(1) Epidural/paraspinal abscess with spondylodiscitis, (2) epidural/paraspinal abscess with facet joint infection, (3) epidural/paraspinal abscess without concomitant spondylodiscitis or facet joint infection, and (4) intradural abscess (subdural abscess, purulent meningitis, and spinal cord abscess).” Critical differential diagnoses for these infectious processes included; “epidural, subdural, or subarachnoid hemorrhage, CSF leak, disc herniation, synovial cyst, granulation tissue, intra- or extradural tumor, and postsurgical fluid collections.” Furthermore, DWI may be helpful both in diagnosing and treating these infections.

MEDICOLEGAL CASES INVOLVING SPINAL EPIDURAL HEMATOMA AND SPINAL EPIDURAL ABSCESS FAVORING EARLY SURGERY

French et al. discussed the fact that spinal epidural hematoma and SEA, although infrequently encountered constitute neurosurgical emergencies.[ 10 ] This retrospective study looked at risk factors that might predict adverse outcomes. Utilizing the LexisNexis Academic legal search database, 19 cases filed concerning spinal epidural hematomas and SEA were identified. There was a significant correlation between time to surgery of more than 48 h and unfavorable verdicts for the provider. Of interest, the “degree of permanent neurologic impairment did not appear to affect the verdicts;” indeed 58% of cases did not present with an initial deficit, including loss of bowel or bladder control. The recommendation was for early diagnosis and surgery for epidural hematomas and SEA.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

References

1. Abd-El-Barr MM, Bi WL, Bahluyen B, Rodriguez ST, Groff MW, Chi JH. Extensive spinal epidural abscess treated with “apical laminectomies” and irrigation of the epidural space: Report of 2 cases. Spine. 2015. 22: 318-23

2. Adogwa O, Karikari IO, Carr KR, Krucoff M, Ajay D, Fatemi P. Spontaneous spinal epidural abscess in patients 50 years of age and older: A 15-year institutional perspective and review of the literature: Clinical article. J Neurosurg Spine. 2014. 20: 344-9

3. Alton TB, Patel AR, Bransford RJ, Bellabarba C, Lee MJ, Chapman JR. Is there a difference in neurologic outcome in medical versus early operative management of cervical epidural abscesses?. Spine J. 2015. 15: 10-7

4. Arko L, Quach E, Nguyen V, Chang D, Sukul V, Kim BS. Medical and surgical management of spinal epidural abscess: A systematic review. Neurosurg Focus. 2014. 37: E4-

5. Avanali R, Ranjan M, Ramachandran S, Devi BI, Narayanan V. Primary pyogenic spinal epidural abscess: How late is too late and how bad is too bad?- A study on surgical outcome after delayed presentation. Br J Neurosurg. 2015. p. 1-6

6. Avilucea FR, Patel AA. Epidural infection: Is it really an abscess?. Surg Neurol Int. 2012. 3: S370-6

7. Boody BS, Jenkins TJ, Maslak J, Hsu WK, Patel AA. Vertebral osteomyelitis and spinal epidural abscess: An evidence-based review. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2015. 28: E316-27

8. Connor DE, Chittiboina P, Caldito G, Nanda A. Comparison of operative and nonoperative management of spinal epidural abscess: A retrospective review of clinical and laboratory predictors of neurological outcome. J Neurosurg Spine. 2013. 19: 119-27

9. Doutchi M, Seng P, Menard A, Meddeb L, Adetchessi T, Fuentes S. Changing trends in the epidemiology of vertebral osteomyelitis in Marseille, France. New Microbes New Infect. 2015. 7: 1-7

10. French KL, Daniels EW, Ahn UM, Ahn NU. Medicolegal cases for spinal epidural hematoma and spinal epidural abscess. Orthopedics. 2013. 36: 48-53

11. Ghobrial GM, Beygi S, Viereck MJ, Maulucci CM, Sharan A, Heller J. Timing in the surgical evacuation of spinal epidural abscesses. Neurosurg Focus. 2014. 37: E1-

12. Ghobrial GM, Viereck MJ, Margiotta PJ, Beygi S, Maulucci CM, Heller JE. Surgical management in 40 consecutive patients with cervical spinal epidural abscesses: Shifting towards circumferential treatment. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015. 40: E949-53

13. Hernández-Puiggròs P, Montes A, Solano A, Aguilar JL, Conesa G, Horcajada JP. Conservative treatment of an epidural abscess after thoracic epidural catheterization. A A Case Rep. 2014. 3: 162-5

14. Hwang R, Yung BH, Sedney C, Miele VJ. Treatment of holocord spinal epidural abscess via alternating side unilateral approach for bilateral laminectomy. W V Med J. 2015. 111: 14, 16-8

15. Kim SD, Melikian R, Ju KL, Zurakowski D, Wood KB, Bono CM. Independent predictors of failure of nonoperative management of spinal epidural abscesses. Spine J. 2014. 14: 1673-9

16. Krishnamohan P, Berger JR. Spinal epidural abscess. Curr Infect Dis Rep. 2014. 16: 436-

17. Lee Y, Kim JS, Kim JY. Cervical meningomyelitis after lumbar epidural steroid injection. Ann Rehabil Med. 2015. 39: 504-7

18. Moritani T, Kim J, Capizzano AA, Kirby P, Kademian J, Sato Y. Pyogenic and non-pyogenic spinal infections: Emphasis on diffusion-weighted imaging for the detection of abscesses and pus collections. Br J Radiol. 2014. 87: 20140011-

19. Moudgal V, Singal B, Kauffman CA, Brodkey JA, Malani AN, Olmsted RN. Spinal and paraspinal fungal infections associated with contaminated methylprednisolone injections. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2014. 1: ofu022-

20. Nicolosi N, Pratt C. Infectious spondylodiscitis, epidural phlegmon, and psoas abscess complicating diabetic foot infection: A case report. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2014. p.

21. Oh JS, Shim JJ, Lee KS, Doh JW. Cervical epidural abscess: Rare complication of bacterial endocarditis with Streptococcus viridans: A case report. Korean J Spine. 2015. 12: 22-5

22. Ohnishi Y, Iwatsuki K, Ishida S, Yoshimine T. Cervical osteomyelitis with thoracic myelitis and meningitis in a diabetic patient. Clin Med Insights Case Rep. 2015. 8: 37-40

23. Park KH, Cho OH, Jung M, Suk KS, Lee JH, Park JS. Clinical characteristics and outcomes of hematogenous vertebral osteomyelitis caused by gram-negative bacteria. J Infect. 2014. 69: 42-50

24. Patel AR, Alton TB, Bransford RJ, Lee MJ, Bellabarba CB, Chapman JR. Spinal epidural abscesses: Risk factors, medical versus surgical management, a retrospective review of 128 cases. Spine J. 2014. 14: 326-30

25. Roßbach BP, Niethammer TR, Paulus AC, Melcher C, Birkenmaier C, Jansson V. Surgical treatment of patients with spondylodiscitis and neurological deficits caused by spinal epidural abscess (SEA) is a predictor of clinical outcome. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2014. 27: 395-400

26. Schoenfeld AJ, Wahlquist TC. Mortality, complication risk, and total charges after the treatment of epidural abscess. Spine J. 2015. 15: 249-55

27. Shiban E, Janssen I, Wostrack M, Krieg SM, Ringel F, Meyer B. A retrospective study of 113 consecutive cases of surgically treated spondylodiscitis patients.A single-center experience. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2014. 156: 1189-96

28. Shousha M, Heyde C, Boehm H. Cervical spondylodiscitis: Change in clinical picture and operative management during the last two decades.A series of 50 patients and review of literature. Eur Spine J. 2015. 24: 571-6

29. Shweikeh F, Saeed K, Bukavina L, Zyck S, Drazin D, Steinmetz MP. An institutional series and contemporary review of bacterial spinal epidural abscess: Current status and future directions. Neurosurg Focus. 2014. 37: E9-

30. Talia AJ, Wong ML, Lau HC, Kaye AH. Safety of instrumentation and fusion at the time of surgical debridement for spinal infection. J Clin Neurosci. 2015. 22: 1111-6

31. Tuchman A, Pham M, Hsieh PC. The indications and timing for operative management of spinal epidural abscess: Literature review and treatment algorithm. Neurosurg Focus. 2014. 37: E8-

32. Verdú-López F, Vanaclocha-Vanaclocha V, Gozalbes-Esterelles L, Sánchez-Pardo M. Minimally invasive spine surgery in spinal infections. J Neurosurg Sci. 2014. 58: 45-56

33. Yang SC, Chen WJ, Chen HS, Kao YH, Yu SW, Tu YK. Extended indications of percutaneous endoscopic lavage and drainage for the treatment of lumbar infectious spondylitis. Eur Spine J. 2014. 23: 846-53

34. Yang SC, Fu TS, Chen HS, Kao YH, Yu SW, Tu YK. Minimally invasive endoscopic treatment for lumbar infectious spondylitis: A retrospective study in a tertiary referral center. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2014. 15: 105-

3 Comments

    avtar image
    Joseph Grossman

    Posted October 22, 2015, 4:02 pm

    I don’t know if you are continuing to collect data for any ongoing study, but in the event that you are, I thought I’d share my story with you.

    I am the father of two teenaged children. In April of 2014, I was 46 years old and in the best physical condition of my life. I was training for my second degree black belt in Karate. I had no risk factors whatsoever for SEA. I did not have diabetes, renal problems, vascular disease or cancer. I did not have any history of smoking, alcohol abuse or intravenous drug use. I had no history of any back pain. I had an open reduction and internal fixation for a fractured right radius one year earlier and have a plate and screws installed, but within a couple of months this had healed uneventfully and I recovered fully.

    After working out one day in April of 2014, I suddenly developed numbness in my calves which, within a couple of hours, had turned into lower back pain. Over the next 10 days, the pain became excruciating and was refractory to muscle relaxants, analgesics and even strong narcotics such as Percocets. I was unable to even transfer without assistance. I did not have any fever and had no neurological deficits, although I did have profuse sweating every time I slept. The first hospital I attended concluded that absent any risk factors or neurological symptoms, a MRI was not indicated and they sent me away. 10 days after the onset of symptoms, I had an MRI without contrast which showed abnormal epidural soft tissues extending from L1 through S1 as well as extensive abnormal and infiltration of the paraspinal muscles and fascial planes with fluid-like collections in the paraspinal muscles. There was a questionable abdominal mass, as well as diffuse decreased T1 signal of the lumbar spine. I then had an MRI with contrast which showed a large SEA. Cultures were positive for MSSA. I was admitted to hospital and developed septicemia. I underwent a laminectomy from T12-S1. a mediastinal exploration via a cervical incision due to a questionable mass pushing on my trachea. I remained in hospital for 13 days.

    I had a PICC line inserted into my arm for eight weeks following my discharge from TWH. It infused cloxacillin at two hour intervals six times a day. After the PICC line was removed in late July, I continued to take heavy doses of oral cloxacillin but then developed a form of reactive arthritis which resulted in widespread swollen and painful joints. This fortunately cleared up after approximately six weeks. The oral cloxacillin was eventually discontinued in late August, approximately 14 weeks post-surgery.

    I am very fortunate that I have no neurological issues. Other than some periodic stiffness in the lumbar spine which does not result in any interference with my ADLs, I have achieved essentially a full recovery. I returned to my Karate training and was able to get my second degree black belt.

    To this day, neither I, my treating neurosurgeon nor my infectious disease specialist has any idea how I contracted the infection. I had no open cuts and there was no obvious portal of entry.

    I would be glad to answer any questions you may have.

    Regards,

    JMG

    Reply
    avtar image
    PHILIP

    Posted November 25, 2018, 6:12 pm

    MY CASE IS IDENTICAL MINE WAS T12-S2 IM 44 YEAROLD GREAT SHAPE I WAS WORKING 14-16 HOURS A DAY THEN ONE DAY I STARTED HAVING SOME PAIN THOUGHT IT WAS SIATIC NERVE ACTING UP WENT TO ER DID MRI NOTHING TREATED ME FOR SIATIC NERVE GAVE ME SHOT MUSCLE RELAXER AND PAIN PILLS THAT NIGHT WOKE UP COULDNT WALK AND SEVERE PAIN CALLED AMBULANCE WENT BACK TO ER DID ANOTHER MRI THEN THEY CAUGHT ABCESS AND DID SURGERY IMEDIATELY THE ABCESS INFECTION WAS STREPOCCOUS HAVE NO IDEA HOW IT GOT THERE WENT HOME WITH IV PIC ANTIBIOTICS ANYWAY GLAD TO HEAR YOU FULLY RECOVERED MY QUESTION HOW LONG DID IT TAKE U TO U WAS ABLE TO WALK ON YOUR OWN I NEVER LOST SENSATION IN MY LOWER EXTREMITIES AND THE DOCTORS SEEMED TO AMAZED BEEN IN THERAPY FOR BOUT 12 DAYS NOW I CAN DO ALL MY ADLS INDEPENDENTLY AND WALKING WITH WALKER 200 FEET AT A TIME BUT STILL REAL WEEK FROM KNEES DOWN ALL THERAPIST SEEM TO BE THINKING IM DOING GREAT BUT WOULD LIKE TO KNOW HOW LONG IT TOOK YOU TO WALK ON YOUR OWN CAUS WHEN I READ YOUR STORY I MEAN IT BLOWED MY MINE I MEAN IDENTICAL ALMOST THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME FOR READING AND HOPEFULLY YOU WILL YOU WILL ANSWER ME GIVE ME SOME INSIGHT AND HOPE THANKS AGAIN

    Reply
    avtar image
    JMG

    Posted November 26, 2018, 8:16 pm

    Philip: Thanks for your comment. I wrote that post three years ago and had almost forgotten about it. As best as I can recall, by the time I left the hospital almost three weeks after my laminectomy, I was able to walk, slowly and with a cane. Over the next month, my wife forced me to walk with her with my cane at least one a day, short distances at first and gradually longer. She refused to let me get discouraged. I then started an intensive physiotherapy program. I was able to finally get rid of the cane and walk unassisted approximately 2 months after the surgery. If you’re in good physical shape, are willing to work really hard at recovering and, most importantly, had no loss of sensation at the time you had your surgery, there is no reason you shouldn’t be able to make a full or near-full recovery. I’m now 4.5 years after surgery and have continued to train in Karate and actually just got my 3rd degree black belt this year. The 4 tests were gruelling but I did it, at the age of 51. The key is to keep yourself in very good physical shape and don’t stop doing the exercises you’re shown in physio. Even now, years later, I regularly do stretching exercises on a huge blue ball so that my back muscles don’t stiffen up. You can do this. Just keep working hard and don’t give up!

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.