Tools

Dounia Hmimidi, Shafie Ariai, Thomas Reithmeier
  1. Department of Neurosurgery, Klinikum Bayreuth GmbH, Betriebsstätte Hohe Warte, Bayreuth, Germany.

Correspondence Address:
Thomas Reithmeier, Department of Neurosurgery, Klinikum Bayreuth GmbH, Betriebsstätte Hohe Warte, Bayreuth, Germany.

DOI:10.25259/SNI_503_2022

Copyright: © 2022 Surgical Neurology International This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, transform, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

How to cite this article: Dounia Hmimidi, Shafie Ariai, Thomas Reithmeier. Ventriculoperitoneal shunt failure due to raised intra-abdominal pressure: A case report and review of the literature. 30-Sep-2022;13:440

How to cite this URL: Dounia Hmimidi, Shafie Ariai, Thomas Reithmeier. Ventriculoperitoneal shunt failure due to raised intra-abdominal pressure: A case report and review of the literature. 30-Sep-2022;13:440. Available from: https://surgicalneurologyint.com/surgicalint-articles/11911/

Date of Submission
28-May-2022

Date of Acceptance
15-Aug-2022

Date of Web Publication
30-Sep-2022

Abstract

Background: Ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunt implantation is the standard neurosurgical procedure to treat hydrocephalus for various reasons. Its function depends on the differential pressure between the ventricular space and the peritoneal cavity. Correct functioning of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) valves requires a gradient of pressure between the ventricular and the abdominal cavity. Any reason that disrupts this balance can result in dysfunction of the system. Increased intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) may be a reason to induce shunt failure by decreasing CSF drainage from the ventricular system to the peritoneal cavity.

Case Description: We report a case of repeated VP shunt failure because of constipation and successful conservative management by lowering IAP without surgical revision of the VP shunt system and reviewed the relevant literature.

Conclusion: Increased IAP for a variety of reason should always be considered as a possible reason for shunt failure that can often be treated conservatively and therefore can reduce unnecessary shunt revision surgery.

Keywords: Abdominal surgery, Constipation, Intra-abdominal pressure, Ventriculoperitoneal shunt dysfunction

INTRODUCTION

A malfunctioning ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunt was always a challenging for neurosurgeons and mostly resulting from obstruction, infection, or disconnection. In this article, we discussed a case of repeated VP shunt (VPS) failure because of constipation as uncommon etiology of VPS failure and reviewed the relevant literature.

CASE REPORT

A 29-year-old man, in whom a VPS had been inserted at the age of 4 months to treat congenital hydrocephalus, presented in our clinic with altered state of consciousness and gait apraxia. The patient did not report other symptoms typical for raised intracranial pressure or shunt infection such as nausea, vomiting, meningism, or fever. His routine laboratory investigation was normal. Emergency computerized tomography (CT) of the head revealed a hydrocephalic ventricular system, suggesting a functional VPS failure [ Figure 1 ]. A shunt series showed a Codman-Hakimventil (pressure level: 90 mmHg) without evidence of shunt disconnection. However, radiographs of the abdomen revealed fecal retention and a striking distention of the right colon [ Figure 2 ]. Furthermore, the patient was operated on a week ago to treat adhesive small bowel obstruction in another hospital. The department of abdominal surgery was advisedly contacted. The performed CT of the abdomen showed a large amount of stool in the small intestine and colon, confirming the diagnosis of severe constipation. Therefore, the patient’s manifestation of shunt failure was attributed to his severe constipation. He was conservatively treated by administration of neostigmine. In the following, the neurological status of the patient improved continuously as his constipation resolved. Moreover, the CT imaging of the head demonstrated that the width of his ventricular system had returned to its previous size [ Figure 3 ]. Therefore, operative VPS revision was not necessary.


Figure 1:

Computed tomography studies of the head showing hydrocephalus at the time of admission.

 

Figure 2:

X-ray of the abdomen showing a faecal retention with bowel distension.

 

Figure 3:

Regression of hydrocephalus after medical treatment of hydrocephalus.

 

Further evaluation of the medical history of the patient revealed a similar situation in 2017. The patient underwent ileus surgery and was admitted to our hospital with suspected meningitis because of fever and alteration of consciousness 2 days after. The patient was immediately transferred to the intensive care unit and endotracheal intubation was required. A spinal tap was ensued, thereby excluding meningitis. A CT of the head showed an advanced hydrocephalus [ Figure 4 ]. Shunt series did not display a shunt disconnection but revealed an obvious meteorism [ Figure 5 ] and a right-sided pneumonia, which was treated by antibiotic. The patient’s condition started to improve after administration of antibiotics. In addition to the shunt series, a shuntogram (using a contrastive medium) was performed. It demonstrated a good peritoneal dissemination of the contrast medium. Therefore, no surgical shunt revision was necessary. Consequently, the valve pressure was reduced from 120 to 90 mmHg. This measure led to complete resolution of shunt dysfunction [ Figure 6 ]. The patient was extubated the following day with no neurological deficits.


Figure 4:

Hydrocephalus due to meteorism.

 

Figure 5:

X-ray of the abdomen showing meteorism.

 

Figure 6:

Resolution of hydrocephalus after downregulation of valve pressure.

 

DISCUSSION

At present, the treatment of choice for most patients with hydrocephalus is a VPS placement. Unfortunately, the rate of complications after VPS surgery is high. The most common causes of shunt failure in both pediatric and adult populations are shunt obstruction followed by infection.[ 13 ] A rare cause of shunt dysfunction is a significant increase of the intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) with the consequence of a reduced differential pressure gradient between the ventricular and intra-abdominal space, thereby reducing the amount of cerebro-spinal fluid (CSF) drained into the intraperitoneal space.

Therefore, we performed a systematically literature review for case reports and reasons of increased IAP leading to VPS dysfunction according to the PRISMA framework [ Figure 7 ]. The database MEDLINE (PubMed) was systematically searched for the keywords “ventriculoperitoneal shunt, malfunction, intra-abdominal hypertension, and constipation” between 1980 and 2021. All articles that discussed other shunt types such as atrioventricular or lumboperitoneal shunts were excluded as well as articles about VPS failure due to other causes (e.g., infection, obstruction, or disconnection).


Figure 7:

PRISMA flow diagram.

 

Actually, constipation is an unusual cause of VPS failure and was first described by Bragg in 1994.[ 1 ] Subsequently, various similar reports and papers were published. In 2004, three cases of VPS malfunction due to constipation were reported by Miele et al.[ 8 ] and in 2006, two cases were reported by Powers et al.[ 14 ] This phenomena was also observed in the pediatric population by Muzumdar and Ventureyra[ 12 ] and Martínez-Lage et al.[ 7 ] They reported one case in 2006 and 2008. In each case, treatment of constipation resulted in both clinical and imaging documented resolution of shunt failure. In 2018, Morais et al. presented a 6-year-old girl with severe transitory VPS failure, which also resolved after her constipation was relieved, avoiding unnecessary surgery.[ 10 ]

However, our literature research revealed several additional reasons of raised IAP, leading to VPS failure.

Already in 1985, Hanakita et al. described a malfunction of a VPS in a 25-year-old woman at 32 weeks of gestation induced by increase of intra-peritoneal pressure due to pregnancy and the VPS system had to be converted into a ventriculoatrial shunt system.[ 5 ] In 2002, Lee et al. reported a rare case of VPS failure after a secondary ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome[ 6 ] and again the VPS system had to be converted into a ventriculoatrial shunt system.[ 4 ]

In 2006, Mirzayan et al. described a patient with exacerbation of a previously shunted hydrocephalus due to meteorism which was conservatively treated by simethicone and amidotrizoic acid for meteorism and constipation.[ 9 ]

In an obstetrical case report, published by Fletcher et al. in 2007, labor was identified as the cause of VPS malfunction. A shunted parturient had an uneventful pregnancy until the 36th week when she presented to the labor ward with drowsiness and decreasing consciousness. The reason was acute shunt malfunction due to increased IAP and the patient recovered after emergency caesarean section.[ 4 ]

Another rare case of VPS dysfunction in a pediatric patient caused by urinary retention was reported by Bulduk and Celtikci. in 2008.[ 2 ] Treatment consisted solely of a basic indwelling urinary catheter.

Moreover, obesity is considered an important factor of an inadequate function of VPSs. In obese individuals, the IAP reaches values between 8 and 12 mmHg. Morais et al. reported in 2018 repeated VPS malfunction in a 16-year-old girl with a body mass index of 48. Revision operations did not show any evidence of malfunction. Ultimately, the VPS was converted into a ventriculoatrial shunt system.[ 11 ] [ Table 1 ] summarizes the various reasons of shunt dysfunction due to intra-abdominal pathologies.


Table 1:

Literature review of different causes of VP shunt dysfunction due to increase of intra-abdominal pressure and treatment options.

 

Besides this physical aspect of VPS dysfunction focusing on changes in the differential pressure, various other factors are described in the literature how intra-abdominal pathologies can influence shunt function. Hypothetically, a stool or a huge bowel loop could mechanically occlude the peritoneal end of the VPS. In addition, increasing intra-peritoneal and IAP decreases the resorptive ability of the peritoneum for CSF.[ 2 ] In addition, abdominal surgery has been blamed for inducing CSF shunt failure as residual inflammation may lead to more adhesions and impairment of CSF absorption, especially in children.[ 3 ]

CONCLUSION

While evaluating a shunt dysfunction, not only shunt dependent factors but also abdominal related problems must be considered with the goal to minimize unnecessary shunt revisions. We, therefore, recommend that patients with a VPS and the need for an abdominal surgery should be treated in a hospital with an additional neurosurgical department.

STATEMENT OF ETHICS

Study approval statement

Ethical approval was not required for this study according to paragraph 15 of the code of the professional conduct for Bavarian doctors: Mrs Sanja Fricke, head of the office, Ethics committee (Bayerische Landesärztekammer, Munich).

Declaration of patient consent

The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

References

1. Bragg CL, Edwards-Beckett J, Eckle N, Principe K, Terry D. Ventriculoperitoneal shunt dysfunction and constipation: A chart review. J Neurosci Nurs. 1994. 26: 265-9

2. Bulduk EB, Celtikci E. Intraabdominal pressure: Is it a cause of shunt dysfunction? A pediatric case reports. GMJ. 2018. 29: 69-71

3. Burks JD, Conner AK, Briggs RG, Glenn CA, Bonney PA, Cheema AA. Risk of failure in pediatric ventriculoperitoneal shunts placed after abdominal surgery. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2017. 19: 571-7

4. Fletcher H, Crandon IW, Webster D. Maternal hydrocephalus in pregnancy and delivery: A report of two cases. West Indian Med J. 2007. 56: 558-9

5. Hanakita J, Suzuki T, Yamamoto Y, Linuta Y, Nishihara K. Ventriculoperitoneal shunt malfunction during pregnancy. J Neurosurg. 1985. 63: 459-60

6. Lee GY, Daniel RT, Jones NR. Ventriculoperitoneal shunt failure as a secondary complication of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. J Neurosurg. 2002. 97: 992-4

7. Martínez-Lage JF, Martos-Tello JM, Ros-de-San Pedro J, Almagro MJ. Severe constipation: An under-appreciated cause of VP shunt malfunction: A case-based update. Childs Nerv Syst. 2008. 24: 431-5

8. Miele VJ, Bendok B, Bloomfield SM, Ondra SL, Bailes JE. Ventriculoperitoneal shunt dysfunction in adults secondary to conditions causing a transient increase in intra-abdominal pressure: Report of three cases. Neurosurgery. 2004. 55: E444-8

9. Mirzayan MJ, Koenig K, Bastuerk M, Krauss JK. Coma due to meteorism and increased intra-abdominal pressure subsequent to ventriculoperitoneal shunt dysfunction. Lancet. 2006. 368: 2032

10. Morais BA, Cardeal DD, Andrade FG, Paiva WS, Matushita H, Teixeira MJ. Reversible ventriculoperitoneal shunt dysfunction and chronic constipation: Case report. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2018. 22: 147-50

11. Morais BA, Yamaki VN, Cardeal DD, Andrade FG, Paiva WS, Matushita H. High intra-abdominal pressure secondary to obesity as a determining factor for ventriculoperitoneal shunt malfunction. Arq Bras Neurocir. 2018. 37: 50-3

12. Muzumdar D, Ventureyra EC. Transient ventriculoperitoneal shunt malfunction after chronic constipation: Case report and review of literature. Childs Nerv Syst. 2007. 23: 455-8

13. Paff M, Alexandru-Abrams D, Muhonen M, Loudon W. Ventriculoperitoneal shunt complications: A review. Interdiscip Neurosurg. 2018. 13: 66-70

14. Powers CJ, George T, Fuchs HE. Constipation as a reversible cause of ventriculoperitoneal shunt failure. Report of two cases. J Neurosurg. 2006. 105: 227-30

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.